H2H data updated: 2026-10-17 00:00 UTC

Serena Williams vs Jennifer Capriati H2H: 10-7

Serena Williams holds a 10–7 lead over Jennifer Capriati in their WTA head-to-head. Across 17 main-draw meetings, Serena Williams leads 5–3 on hard courts, while they are tied 3–3 on clay. Most recently, Jennifer Capriati won the 2004 US Open quarterfinal 2-6 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Serena Williams

USA Age 45 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H

10 – 7

17 main-draw meetings

Jennifer Capriati

USA Age 50 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

Player	Score	Player	Match Data	Date	Round	Tournament	Category	Surface
Jennifer Capriati #8	2-6 6-4 6-4	Serena Williams #11	Match data	Sep 9, 2004*	QF	US Open	Grand Slam	Hard
Serena Williams #10	6-1 6-1	Jennifer Capriati #7	Match data	Jul 2, 2004*	QF	Wimbledon	Grand Slam	Grass
Jennifer Capriati #6	6-3 2-6 6-3	Serena Williams #7	Match data	Jun 3, 2004*	QF	Roland Garros	Grand Slam	Clay
Jennifer Capriati #8	6-4 6-4	Serena Williams #7	Match data	May 15, 2004*	SF	Italian Open	Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000	Clay
Serena Williams #1	2-6 6-2 6-3	Jennifer Capriati #7	Match data	Jul 4, 2003*	QF	Wimbledon	Grand Slam	Grass
Serena Williams #1	4-6 6-4 6-1	Jennifer Capriati #5	Match data	Mar 25, 2003*	F	Miami Open	Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000	Hard
Serena Williams #1	2-6 6-4 6-4	Jennifer Capriati #3	Match data	Nov 13, 2002*	SF	WTA Finals	WTA Finals	Hard
Serena Williams #3	3-6 7-6(2) 6-2	Jennifer Capriati #1	Match data	Jun 8, 2002*	SF	Roland Garros	Grand Slam	Clay
Serena Williams #4	6-2 3-6 7-5	Jennifer Capriati #2	Match data	May 18, 2002*	SF	Italian Open	Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000	Clay
Serena Williams #9	7-5 7-6(4)	Jennifer Capriati #1	Match data	Mar 24, 2002*	F	Miami Open	Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000	Hard
Serena Williams #9	6-2 4-6 6-4	Jennifer Capriati #2	Match data	Mar 3, 2002*	F	Scottsdale	Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500	Hard
Serena Williams #10	6-1 6-7(7) 6-3	Jennifer Capriati #3	Match data	Aug 19, 2001*	F	Canadian Open	Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000	Hard
Jennifer Capriati #4	6-7(4) 7-5 6-3	Serena Williams #5	Match data	Jul 6, 2001*	QF	Wimbledon	Grand Slam	Grass
Jennifer Capriati #4	6-2 5-7 6-2	Serena Williams #7	Match data	Jun 7, 2001*	QF	Roland Garros	Grand Slam	Clay
Jennifer Capriati #5	6-1 7-6(5)	Serena Williams #7	Match data	Mar 26, 2001*	QF	Miami Open	Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000	Hard
Jennifer Capriati #14	7-6(2) 1-6 6-3	Serena Williams #6	Match data	Mar 24, 2000*	R16	Miami Open	Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000	Hard
Serena Williams #11	7-6 6-3	Jennifer Capriati #115	Match data	May 13, 1999*	R32	Berlin Open	Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000	Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player	Current	Peak	Pts	Elo	W	L	Win %	GS	Olympics	1000 including documented historical predecessor categories	Finals	500 including documented historical predecessor categories	250 including documented historical predecessor categories	Titles
Serena Williams	#320	#1	13,615	2,399	837	172	83.0%	23	1	23	6	18	2	73
Jennifer Capriati	#54	#1	5,123	2,253	411	170	70.7%	3	1	2	0	2	6	14

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age	Serena Williams							Jennifer Capriati
Age	Yr	W-L	Win %	Rank	Elo	GS	Titles	Yr	W-L	Win %	Rank	Elo	GS	Titles
14	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1990	37–11	77.1%	#8	1,962	0	1
15	1997	3–2	60.0%	#101	1,582	0	0	1991	39–11	78.0%	#6	2,193	0	3
16	1998	26–11	70.3%	#20	1,893	0	0	1992	35–11	76.1%	#7	2,204	0	5
17	1999	38–7	84.4%	#4	2,189	1	5	1993	30–11	73.2%	#9	2,157	0	6
18	2000	37–8	82.2%	#6	2,184	1	8	1994	0–1	0.0%	#42	2,133	0	6
19	2001	40–7	85.1%	#6	2,237	1	11	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
20	2002	57–5	91.9%	#1	2,339	4	19	1996	16–9	64.0%	#36	2,079	0	6
21	2003	36–3	92.3%	#3	2,365	6	23	1997	10–12	45.5%	#65	1,910	0	6
22	2004	39–11	78.0%	#7	2,225	6	25	1998	8–12	40.0%	#99	1,764	0	6
23	2005	21–9	70.0%	#11	2,101	7	26	1999	26–13	66.7%	#23	1,912	0	8
24	2006	12–4	75.0%	#95	2,063	7	26	2000	35–19	64.8%	#14	1,908	0	9
25	2007	34–10	77.3%	#7	2,077	8	28	2001	56–14	80.0%	#2	2,097	2	12
26	2008	44–9	83.0%	#2	2,126	9	32	2002	48–16	75.0%	#3	2,019	3	13
27	2009	50–13	79.4%	#1	2,120	11	35	2003	42–18	70.0%	#6	2,022	3	14
28	2010	25–4	86.2%	#4	2,158	13	37	2004	29–12	70.7%	#10	2,020	3	14
29	2011	22–4	84.6%	#12	2,182	13	39	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
30	2012	54–6	90.0%	#3	2,302	15	46	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
31	2013	77–5	93.9%	#1	2,382	17	57	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
32	2014	52–10	83.9%	#1	2,272	18	64	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
33	2015	50–6	89.3%	#1	2,292	21	69	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
34	2016	38–6	86.4%	#2	2,208	22	71	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
35	2017	8–1	88.9%	#22	2,200	23	72	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
36	2018	18–7	72.0%	#16	2,111	23	72	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
37	2019	25–8	75.8%	#10	2,093	23	72	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
38	2020	16–5	76.2%	#11	2,045	23	73	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
39	2021	12–6	66.7%	#41	1,994	23	73	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
40	2022	3–4	42.9%	#320	1,926	23	73	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
44	2026	0–1	0.0%	#320	1,899	23	73	—	—	—	—	—	—	—

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age	Serena Williams																	Jennifer Capriati
	Yr	Hard				Clay				Grass				Carpet				Yr	Hard				Clay				Grass				Carpet
	Yr	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	Yr	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %
14	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1990	18	4	22	81.8%	13	3	16	81.3%	4	2	6	66.7%	2	2	4	50.0%
15	1997	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	3	2	5	60.0%	1991	20	3	23	87.0%	9	4	13	69.2%	5	1	6	83.3%	5	3	8	62.5%
16	1998	16	7	23	69.6%	6	2	8	75.0%	4	2	6	66.7%	—	—	—	—	1992	10	3	13	76.9%	14	4	18	77.8%	4	1	5	80.0%	7	3	10	70.0%
17	1999	27	4	31	87.1%	6	3	9	66.7%	—	—	—	—	5	0	5	100.0%	1993	14	4	18	77.8%	12	6	18	66.7%	4	1	5	80.0%	—	—	—	—
18	2000	29	5	34	85.3%	0	1	1	0.0%	5	1	6	83.3%	3	1	4	75.0%	1994	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0	1	1	0.0%
19	2001	32	5	37	86.5%	4	1	5	80.0%	4	1	5	80.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
20	2002	28	3	31	90.3%	18	2	20	90.0%	7	0	7	100.0%	4	0	4	100.0%	1996	10	6	16	62.5%	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	6	2	8	75.0%
21	2003	13	0	13	100.0%	12	3	15	80.0%	7	0	7	100.0%	4	0	4	100.0%	1997	7	7	14	50.0%	3	3	6	50.0%	—	—	—	—	0	2	2	0.0%
22	2004	23	6	29	79.3%	10	4	14	71.4%	6	1	7	85.7%	—	—	—	—	1998	0	4	4	0.0%	6	6	12	50.0%	1	1	2	50.0%	1	1	2	50.0%
23	2005	16	5	21	76.2%	2	2	4	50.0%	2	1	3	66.7%	1	1	2	50.0%	1999	14	7	21	66.7%	10	3	13	76.9%	1	1	2	50.0%	1	2	3	33.3%
24	2006	12	4	16	75.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	2000	21	11	32	65.6%	0	3	3	0.0%	8	3	11	72.7%	6	2	8	75.0%
25	2007	24	6	30	80.0%	6	3	9	66.7%	4	1	5	80.0%	—	—	—	—	2001	32	10	42	76.2%	16	2	18	88.9%	5	1	6	83.3%	3	1	4	75.0%
26	2008	27	5	32	84.4%	11	3	14	78.6%	6	1	7	85.7%	—	—	—	—	2002	30	11	41	73.2%	14	4	18	77.8%	4	1	5	80.0%	—	—	—	—
27	2009	36	8	44	81.8%	4	4	8	50.0%	7	0	7	100.0%	3	1	4	75.0%	2003	25	11	36	69.4%	11	4	15	73.3%	6	2	8	75.0%	0	1	1	0.0%
28	2010	10	1	11	90.9%	8	3	11	72.7%	7	0	7	100.0%	—	—	—	—	2004	12	7	19	63.2%	13	4	17	76.5%	4	1	5	80.0%	—	—	—	—
29	2011	18	2	20	90.0%	—	—	—	—	4	2	6	66.7%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
30	2012	26	4	30	86.7%	15	2	17	88.2%	13	0	13	100.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
31	2013	46	4	50	92.0%	28	0	28	100.0%	3	1	4	75.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
32	2014	41	6	47	87.2%	9	3	12	75.0%	2	1	3	66.7%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
33	2015	30	3	33	90.9%	13	3	16	81.3%	7	0	7	100.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
34	2016	20	5	25	80.0%	11	1	12	91.7%	7	0	7	100.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
35	2017	8	1	9	88.9%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
36	2018	9	5	14	64.3%	3	1	4	75.0%	6	1	7	85.7%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
37	2019	16	5	21	76.2%	3	2	5	60.0%	6	1	7	85.7%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
38	2020	15	4	19	78.9%	1	1	2	50.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
39	2021	8	2	10	80.0%	4	3	7	57.1%	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
40	2022	3	3	6	50.0%	—	—	—	—	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
44	2026	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Career	—	533	103	636	83.8%	174	47	221	78.7%	107	17	124	86.3%	23	5	28	82.1%	—	213	88	301	70.8%	121	47	168	72.0%	46	15	61	75.4%	31	20	51	60.8%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 633/768 of Serena Williams's and 31/101 of Jennifer Capriati's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age	Serena Williams											Jennifer Capriati
Age	Yr	Sample	Aces/M	DFs/M	1st Sv%	1st Pts%	2nd Pts%	BP Saved%	BP Conv%	Svc Pts%	Ret Pts%	Yr	Sample	Aces/M	DFs/M	1st Sv%	1st Pts%	2nd Pts%	BP Saved%	BP Conv%	Svc Pts%	Ret Pts%
21	2003	13/39	3.9	2.1	61.7%	74.0%	52.8%	63.9%	58.8%	66.1%	51.8%	—	—/—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
22	2004	16/50	6.4	2.6	61.3%	73.3%	51.5%	64.8%	54.6%	64.9%	49.7%	—	—/—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
23	2005	14/30	5.9	2.6	61.2%	74.1%	52.5%	68.0%	48.3%	65.1%	47.5%	—	—/—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
24	2006	15/16	6.3	2.9	59.3%	74.2%	47.4%	54.7%	58.2%	63.1%	46.9%	—	—/—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
25	2007	42/44	6.1	2.6	59.4%	69.2%	48.1%	58.2%	57.3%	60.8%	46.0%	—	—/—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
26	2008	44/53	6.8	2.7	61.4%	73.4%	45.2%	60.0%	47.6%	62.7%	47.7%	—	—/—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
27	2009	57/63	6.2	2.8	60.8%	75.0%	50.7%	54.5%	48.2%	65.3%	46.2%	2003	15/60	2.9	3.9	57.8%	71.0%	51.8%	55.7%	53.2%	63.1%	53.5%
28	2010	29/29	8.6	2.9	62.3%	77.4%	47.5%	66.0%	51.5%	66.4%	46.8%	2004	16/41	2.5	2.8	64.8%	67.6%	51.8%	43.9%	45.7%	61.7%	47.4%
29	2011	25/26	8.0	2.5	59.0%	79.5%	53.0%	67.2%	50.8%	68.7%	46.9%	—	—/—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
30	2012	48/60	8.2	2.3	59.0%	78.7%	54.8%	66.6%	53.2%	68.8%	49.8%	—	—/—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
31	2013	74/82	6.1	2.2	63.0%	76.5%	53.5%	60.3%	56.0%	68.1%	52.4%	—	—/—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
32	2014	56/62	7.7	3.5	59.3%	76.5%	51.6%	64.4%	52.8%	66.3%	48.9%	—	—/—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
33	2015	50/56	9.5	3.5	59.9%	76.7%	55.9%	67.3%	54.5%	68.4%	47.8%	—	—/—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
34	2016	41/44	7.9	2.8	62.3%	77.4%	51.9%	58.8%	50.6%	68.0%	49.0%	—	—/—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
35	2017	9/9	7.9	3.9	55.9%	79.6%	46.7%	57.9%	51.3%	65.7%	46.5%	—	—/—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
36	2018	24/25	7.1	3.4	59.2%	74.2%	48.5%	55.3%	51.9%	63.9%	44.0%	—	—/—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
37	2019	31/33	6.6	2.8	59.2%	76.5%	50.4%	50.4%	45.6%	65.5%	46.7%	—	—/—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
38	2020	20/21	8.9	2.7	61.3%	73.3%	50.7%	71.0%	49.7%	64.3%	44.9%	—	—/—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
39	2021	17/18	5.1	2.6	57.4%	72.6%	48.9%	43.6%	49.4%	62.4%	46.2%	—	—/—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
40	2022	7/7	8.0	4.7	65.0%	68.0%	35.4%	62.0%	45.8%	56.6%	40.5%	—	—/—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
44	2026	1/1	7.0	7.0	79.0%	62.7%	45.0%	54.6%	27.3%	59.0%	38.2%	—	—/—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Career	—	633/1,009	7.2	2.8	60.6%	75.5%	50.9%	60.9%	52.1%	65.8%	48.0%	—	31/581	2.7	3.3	61.4%	69.2%	51.8%	49.6%	49.3%	62.4%	50.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age	Serena Williams																Jennifer Capriati
Age	Yr	Elo	P+	Serve+	Return+	PD	TPW%	Hard Elo	Clay Elo	Grass Elo	Set Win %	Set Margin	Dec. Set	Tiebreak	Pressure+	Schedule	Yr	Elo	P+	Serve+	Return+	PD	TPW%	Hard Elo	Clay Elo	Grass Elo	Set Win %	Set Margin	Dec. Set	Tiebreak	Pressure+	Schedule
14	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1990	1963	165.3	—	—	—	—	-90	-119	-300	73.8%	+1.71	5–4 (56%)	7–4 (64%)	108.9	-1.20
15	1997	1582	144.0	—	—	—	—	+41	—	—	54.5%	+0.82	1–0	1–1	—	-0.18	1991	2194	172.3	—	—	—	—	-41	-252	-411	73.6%	+1.89	6–4 (60%)	5–3 (63%)	103.7	-2.21
16	1998	1893	158.1	—	—	—	—	-61	-201	-194	64.6%	+1.29	8–5 (62%)	2–3 (40%)	106.2	-1.20	1992	2204	166.5	—	—	—	—	-40	-116	-325	70.8%	+1.41	9–5 (64%)	6–2 (75%)	106.0	-3.08
17	1999	2189	178.2	—	—	—	—	+12	-418	—	80.2%	+2.10	8–5 (62%)	6–0 (100%)	108.5	-2.69	1993	2157	170.7	—	—	—	—	+9	-75	-205	66.3%	+1.68	11–7 (61%)	3–6 (33%)	96.4	-2.41
18	2000	2185	168.9	—	—	—	—	+24	—	-372	80.6%	+2.43	6–1 (86%)	4–3 (57%)	102.2	+0.56	1994	2134	109.3	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	33.3%	-1.33	0–1	—	—	-0.17
19	2001	2238	172.8	—	—	—	—	+36	-434	-326	79.2%	+2.45	7–4 (64%)	5–5 (50%)	100.5	-2.79	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
20	2002	2339	173.5	—	—	—	—	+18	-278	-232	87.1%	+2.70	9–3 (75%)	11–1 (92%)	111.5	-2.86	1996	2079	163.1	—	—	—	—	+14	—	—	64.0%	+0.96	2–2 (50%)	5–1 (83%)	102.1	-1.41
21	2003	2365	170.4	+7.11	+5.95	1.527	58.7%	+80	-218	-130	86.0%	+2.74	6–2 (75%)	2–0	—	-1.67	1997	1911	146.0	—	—	—	—	+18	+101	—	49.0%	-0.27	3–4 (43%)	2–2 (50%)	95.7	-1.31
22	2004	2226	163.6	+6.68	+4.43	1.416	56.9%	+107	-102	+86	74.8%	+1.90	9–4 (69%)	4–3 (57%)	96.9	-0.38	1998	1764	130.1	—	—	—	—	+85	+151	—	45.8%	-0.23	2–6 (25%)	1–1	—	-0.36
23	2005	2101	150.6	+5.70	+2.41	1.360	56.0%	+157	-3	+122	70.0%	+1.48	8–0 (100%)	1–6 (14%)	99.2	-0.26	1999	1913	147.1	—	—	—	—	-14	+14	—	59.1%	+0.65	10–2 (83%)	2–3 (40%)	106.4	-2.28
24	2006	2064	147.1	+4.12	+2.38	1.272	54.9%	+120	—	—	69.4%	+1.75	3–1 (75%)	0–3 (0%)	96.2	-0.43	2000	1909	154.0	—	—	—	—	+20	-74	+142	59.5%	+0.65	11–4 (73%)	10–3 (77%)	108.8	-1.61
25	2007	2077	165.4	+4.80	+3.80	1.173	53.4%	+88	+12	+154	78.3%	+1.84	6–4 (60%)	9–3 (75%)	101.7	-2.31	2001	2097	171.2	—	—	—	—	-40	-19	+31	73.3%	+1.61	16–11 (59%)	5–4 (56%)	104.6	-3.91
26	2008	2126	164.9	+6.89	+4.29	1.280	55.0%	+42	-33	+130	80.0%	+2.11	9–4 (69%)	5–2 (71%)	102.9	-1.00	2002	2020	164.6	—	—	—	—	+15	+70	+124	69.1%	+1.58	14–9 (61%)	3–6 (33%)	96.3	-0.66
27	2009	2120	165.8	+9.20	+3.92	1.332	55.3%	+59	-117	+157	75.6%	+1.76	11–6 (65%)	8–8 (50%)	98.1	-2.33	2003	2022	162.2	+5.66	+6.87	1.449	58.1%	+9	+59	+108	68.6%	+1.42	9–14 (39%)	6–6 (50%)	92.2	-0.42
28	2010	2159	157.0	+8.78	+3.86	1.393	56.1%	+37	-163	+212	79.1%	+2.01	6–3 (67%)	10–2 (83%)	106.5	-1.14	2004	2020	149.6	+5.09	+3.12	1.238	54.1%	-61	+96	+157	65.6%	+1.08	8–3 (73%)	3–5 (38%)	101.8	-1.09
29	2011	2182	160.3	+9.93	+4.56	1.499	57.5%	+57	—	+125	78.9%	+2.33	6–1 (86%)	3–2 (60%)	101.2	-0.27	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
30	2012	2302	168.5	+11.57	+6.33	1.597	58.7%	-26	-157	+62	88.2%	+2.98	6–1 (86%)	3–2 (60%)	103.3	-2.18	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
31	2013	2383	177.8	+12.05	+8.21	1.643	59.9%	-2	-40	+41	89.7%	+3.22	10–4 (71%)	3–3 (50%)	101.0	-0.69	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
32	2014	2273	171.7	+9.98	+6.05	1.454	57.3%	+56	+1	+33	83.6%	+2.37	7–3 (70%)	8–0 (100%)	102.4	-0.53	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
33	2015	2293	165.1	+9.57	+5.97	1.514	57.9%	+37	-12	+16	81.3%	+2.24	17–2 (89%)	7–2 (78%)	105.8	-0.61	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
34	2016	2208	161.7	+10.55	+5.23	1.529	57.9%	+31	+121	+136	83.0%	+2.39	4–2 (67%)	8–2 (80%)	100.3	-0.68	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
35	2017	2201	137.8	+4.47	+1.79	1.354	56.0%	+39	—	—	89.5%	+2.32	0–1	1–0	—	-0.09	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
36	2018	2112	148.0	+5.23	+2.07	1.220	53.7%	+22	+269	+229	71.2%	+1.29	3–1 (75%)	3–0 (100%)	102.0	-0.74	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
37	2019	2094	156.8	+7.34	+3.63	1.352	55.6%	+42	+282	+271	77.3%	+2.05	7–1 (88%)	—	—	-0.12	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
38	2020	2046	143.2	+4.70	+1.29	1.259	54.8%	+19	—	—	70.6%	+1.55	7–4 (64%)	4–3 (57%)	97.0	+0.56	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
39	2021	1994	145.6	+4.15	+2.90	1.229	53.9%	+132	+333	—	68.6%	+1.54	3–0 (100%)	2–2 (50%)	101.9	-0.19	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
40	2022	1926	119.5	+0.06	-0.90	0.934	48.7%	+144	—	—	47.1%	-0.35	1–2 (33%)	2–1 (67%)	—	+0.04	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
44	2026	1899	96.8	+1.05	-3.04	0.931	47.3%	—	—	—	33.3%	-1.67	0–1	1–0	—	+0.12	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Career	—	2399	174.5	+8.45	+4.78	1.403	56.6%	+43	-85	+34	79.6%	+2.21	168–65 (72%)	113–57 (66%)	110.8	-2.44	—	2254	169.4	+5.37	+4.93	1.338	56.1%	-14	-17	-51	66.6%	+1.25	106–76 (58%)	58–46 (56%)	103.9	-3.83

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.

Serena Williams's most-played WTA rivals
Opponent	W	L	M	Last Played	H2H
Venus Williams	20	13	33	Aug 14, 2020	H2H
Victoria Azarenka	19	5	24	Sep 12, 2020	H2H
Maria Sharapova	20	3	23	Aug 28, 2019	H2H
Jennifer Capriati	10	7	17	Sep 9, 2004	H2H
Jelena Jankovic	10	4	14	Aug 16, 2014	H2H

Jennifer Capriati's most-played WTA rivals
Opponent	W	L	M	Last Played	H2H
Serena Williams	7	10	17	Sep 9, 2004	H2H
Gabriela Sabatini	5	11	16	Oct 17, 1996	H2H
Monica Seles	5	9	14	Mar 23, 2002	H2H
Lindsay Davenport	3	9	12	Aug 24, 2003	H2H
Amélie Mauresmo	4	7	11	May 16, 2004	H2H