H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Serena Williams vs Jill Craybas H2H: 2-1

Serena Williams holds a 2–1 lead over Jill Craybas in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass, while Serena Williams leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jill Craybas won the 2005 Wimbledon third round 6-3 7-6(4).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Serena Williams
USA Age 44 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Jill Craybas
USA Age 52 Right-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 26, 2005* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Jill Craybas #85 6-3 7-6(4) Serena Williams #4 Match data
Mar 29, 2004* Miami WTA 1000 QF Hard Serena Williams #6 6-0 6-1 Jill Craybas #73 Match data
Jun 25, 2003* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Serena Williams #1 6-3 6-3 Jill Craybas #67 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Serena Williams #320 #1 13,615 2,405 825 170 82.9% 23 23 5 17 3 71
Jill Craybas #336 #39 974 1,695 161 256 38.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Serena Williams Jill Craybas
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1997 3–2 60.0% #101 1,582 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1998 26–11 70.3% #20 1,895 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1999 37–7 84.1% #4 2,170 1 4 — — — — — — —
18 2000 37–8 82.2% #6 2,174 1 7 — — — — — — —
19 2001 40–7 85.1% #6 2,259 1 10 — — — — — — —
20 2002 57–5 91.9% #1 2,348 4 18 — — — — — — —
21 2003 36–3 92.3% #3 2,369 6 22 1996 0–1 0.0% — 1,488 0 0
22 2004 39–11 78.0% #7 2,192 6 24 — — — — — — —
23 2005 21–9 70.0% #11 2,028 7 25 1998 0–1 0.0% #154 1,473 0 0
24 2006 12–4 75.0% #95 2,016 7 25 1999 0–4 0.0% #175 1,445 0 0
25 2007 34–10 77.3% #7 2,058 8 27 2000 1–2 33.3% #145 1,449 0 0
26 2008 41–8 83.7% #2 2,109 9 31 2001 8–17 32.0% #98 1,479 0 0
27 2009 50–13 79.4% #1 2,106 11 34 2002 19–15 55.9% #57 1,652 0 1
28 2010 25–4 86.2% #4 2,149 13 36 2003 16–22 42.1% #99 1,568 0 1
29 2011 22–4 84.6% #12 2,155 13 38 2004 12–21 36.4% #59 1,499 0 1
30 2012 48–6 88.9% #3 2,239 15 44 2005 19–23 45.2% #48 1,614 0 1
31 2013 77–5 93.9% #1 2,345 17 55 2006 18–25 41.9% #70 1,569 0 1
32 2014 52–10 83.9% #1 2,209 18 62 2007 12–27 30.8% #79 1,472 0 1
33 2015 50–6 89.3% #1 2,197 21 67 2008 22–25 46.8% #64 1,575 0 1
34 2016 36–5 87.8% #2 2,177 22 69 2009 12–21 36.4% #76 1,592 0 1
35 2017 8–1 88.9% #22 2,172 23 70 2010 12–23 34.3% #98 1,546 0 1
36 2018 18–7 72.0% #16 2,078 23 70 2011 6–20 23.1% #150 1,442 0 1
37 2019 25–8 75.8% #10 2,052 23 70 2012 3–7 30.0% #189 1,449 0 1
38 2020 16–5 76.2% #11 1,991 23 71 2013 1–2 33.3% #336 1,451 0 1
39 2021 12–6 66.7% #41 1,950 23 71 — — — — — — —
40 2022 3–4 42.9% #320 1,891 23 71 — — — — — — —
44 2026 0–1 0.0% #320 — 23 71 — — — — — — —