H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Serena Williams vs Lilia Osterloh H2H: 2-0

Serena Williams holds a 2–0 lead over Lilia Osterloh in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Serena Williams leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Serena Williams won the 2002 Miami second round 7-5 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Serena Williams
USA Age 44 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Lilia Osterloh
USA Age 48 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 20, 2002* Miami WTA 1000 R64 Hard Serena Williams #9 7-5 6-1 Lilia Osterloh #53 Match data
Jan 10, 2001* Sydney WTA 500 R32 Hard Serena Williams #6 6-3 7-6(6) Lilia Osterloh #42 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Serena Williams #320 #1 13,615 2,405 825 170 82.9% 23 23 5 17 3 71
Lilia Osterloh #1,223 #41 738 1,697 83 138 37.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Serena Williams Lilia Osterloh
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1997 3–2 60.0% #101 1,582 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1998 26–11 70.3% #20 1,895 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1999 37–7 84.1% #4 2,170 1 4 — — — — — — —
18 2000 37–8 82.2% #6 2,174 1 7 1996 1–1 50.0% #195 1,518 0 0
19 2001 40–7 85.1% #6 2,259 1 10 1997 2–2 50.0% #170 1,551 0 0
20 2002 57–5 91.9% #1 2,348 4 18 1998 0–5 0.0% #120 1,501 0 0
21 2003 36–3 92.3% #3 2,369 6 22 1999 9–13 40.9% #79 1,545 0 0
22 2004 39–11 78.0% #7 2,192 6 24 2000 15–19 44.1% #43 1,595 0 0
23 2005 21–9 70.0% #11 2,028 7 25 2001 23–25 47.9% #53 1,659 0 0
24 2006 12–4 75.0% #95 2,016 7 25 2002 7–18 28.0% #156 1,535 0 0
25 2007 34–10 77.3% #7 2,058 8 27 2003 0–2 0.0% #180 1,509 0 0
26 2008 41–8 83.7% #2 2,109 9 31 2004 4–5 44.4% #119 1,561 0 0
27 2009 50–13 79.4% #1 2,106 11 34 2005 2–9 18.2% #144 1,488 0 0
28 2010 25–4 86.2% #4 2,149 13 36 2006 6–8 42.9% #118 1,509 0 0
29 2011 22–4 84.6% #12 2,155 13 38 2007 7–12 36.8% #91 1,543 0 0
30 2012 48–6 88.9% #3 2,239 15 44 2008 3–10 23.1% #230 1,486 0 0
31 2013 77–5 93.9% #1 2,345 17 55 2009 3–3 50.0% #136 1,510 0 0
32 2014 52–10 83.9% #1 2,209 18 62 2010 1–6 14.3% #237 1,467 0 0
33 2015 50–6 89.3% #1 2,197 21 67 — — — — — — —
34 2016 36–5 87.8% #2 2,177 22 69 — — — — — — —
35 2017 8–1 88.9% #22 2,172 23 70 — — — — — — —
36 2018 18–7 72.0% #16 2,078 23 70 — — — — — — —
37 2019 25–8 75.8% #10 2,052 23 70 — — — — — — —
38 2020 16–5 76.2% #11 1,991 23 71 — — — — — — —
39 2021 12–6 66.7% #41 1,950 23 71 — — — — — — —
40 2022 3–4 42.9% #320 1,891 23 71 — — — — — — —
44 2026 0–1 0.0% #320 — 23 71 — — — — — — —