H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Serena Williams vs Lourdes Domínguez Lino H2H: 4-0

Serena Williams holds a 4–0 lead over Lourdes Domínguez Lino in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Serena Williams leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Serena Williams won the 2013 Bastad quarterfinal 6-1 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Serena Williams
USA Age 44 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
4 – 0
4 main draw meetings
Lourdes Domínguez Lino
ESP Age 45 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 20, 2013* Bastad WTA 250 QF Clay Serena Williams #1 6-1 6-1 Lourdes Domínguez Lino #54 Match data
May 9, 2013* Madrid WTA 1000 R32 Clay Serena Williams #1 6-2 7-5 Lourdes Domínguez Lino #47 Match data
Jun 27, 2007* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Serena Williams #8 7-5 6-0 Lourdes Domínguez Lino #57 Match data
Aug 30, 2006* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Serena Williams #91 6-1 6-2 Lourdes Domínguez Lino #41 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Serena Williams #320 #1 13,615 2,405 825 170 82.9% 23 23 5 17 3 71
Lourdes Domínguez Lino #1,129 #40 1,305 1,674 125 157 44.3% 0 0 0 1 1 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Serena Williams Lourdes Domínguez Lino
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1997 3–2 60.0% #101 1,582 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1998 26–11 70.3% #20 1,895 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1999 37–7 84.1% #4 2,170 1 4 — — — — — — —
18 2000 37–8 82.2% #6 2,174 1 7 — — — — — — —
19 2001 40–7 85.1% #6 2,259 1 10 2000 0–1 0.0% #141 1,489 0 0
20 2002 57–5 91.9% #1 2,348 4 18 2001 0–1 0.0% #378 1,479 0 0
21 2003 36–3 92.3% #3 2,369 6 22 2002 4–3 57.1% #390 1,518 0 0
22 2004 39–11 78.0% #7 2,192 6 24 2003 0–1 0.0% #319 1,503 0 0
23 2005 21–9 70.0% #11 2,028 7 25 2004 1–1 50.0% #208 1,508 0 0
24 2006 12–4 75.0% #95 2,016 7 25 2005 6–4 60.0% #72 1,553 0 0
25 2007 34–10 77.3% #7 2,058 8 27 2006 21–19 52.5% #52 1,622 0 1
26 2008 41–8 83.7% #2 2,109 9 31 2007 16–21 43.2% #71 1,558 0 1
27 2009 50–13 79.4% #1 2,106 11 34 2008 6–11 35.3% #91 1,521 0 1
28 2010 25–4 86.2% #4 2,149 13 36 2009 6–13 31.6% #134 1,484 0 1
29 2011 22–4 84.6% #12 2,155 13 38 2010 2–4 33.3% #85 1,493 0 1
30 2012 48–6 88.9% #3 2,239 15 44 2011 16–16 50.0% #79 1,583 0 2
31 2013 77–5 93.9% #1 2,345 17 55 2012 16–16 50.0% #48 1,653 0 2
32 2014 52–10 83.9% #1 2,209 18 62 2013 17–22 43.6% #69 1,620 0 2
33 2015 50–6 89.3% #1 2,197 21 67 2014 7–11 38.9% #110 1,570 0 2
34 2016 36–5 87.8% #2 2,177 22 69 2015 4–5 44.4% #100 1,552 0 2
35 2017 8–1 88.9% #22 2,172 23 70 2016 3–8 27.3% #220 1,517 0 2
36 2018 18–7 72.0% #16 2,078 23 70 — — — — — — —
37 2019 25–8 75.8% #10 2,052 23 70 — — — — — — —
38 2020 16–5 76.2% #11 1,991 23 71 — — — — — — —
39 2021 12–6 66.7% #41 1,950 23 71 — — — — — — —
40 2022 3–4 42.9% #320 1,891 23 71 — — — — — — —
44 2026 0–1 0.0% #320 — 23 71 — — — — — — —