H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Serena Williams vs Maria Sharapova H2H: 19-3

Serena Williams holds a 19–3 lead over Maria Sharapova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 22 main-draw meetings, Serena Williams leads 13–1 on hard courts and 4–1 on clay. Most recently, Serena Williams won the 2019 US Open first round 6-1 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Serena Williams
USA Age 44 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
19 – 3
22 main draw meetings
Maria Sharapova
RUS Age 39 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 28, 2019* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Serena Williams #8 6-1 6-1 Maria Sharapova #87 Match data
Jun 5, 2018* Roland Garros Grand Slam R16 Clay Maria Sharapova #30 (w/o) Serena Williams #451 Match data
Jan 28, 2016* Australian Open Grand Slam QF Hard Serena Williams #1 6-4 6-1 Maria Sharapova #5 Match data
Jul 11, 2015* Wimbledon Grand Slam SF Grass Serena Williams #1 6-2 6-4 Maria Sharapova #4 Match data
Jan 31, 2015* Australian Open Grand Slam F Hard Serena Williams #1 6-3 7-6(5) Maria Sharapova #2 Match data
Mar 22, 2014* Miami WTA 1000 SF Hard Serena Williams #1 6-4 6-3 Maria Sharapova #7 Match data
Jan 4, 2014* Brisbane WTA 500 SF Hard Serena Williams #1 6-2 7-6(7) Maria Sharapova #4 Match data
Jun 9, 2013* Roland Garros Grand Slam F Clay Serena Williams #1 6-4 6-4 Maria Sharapova #2 Match data
May 12, 2013* Madrid WTA 1000 F Clay Serena Williams #1 6-1 6-4 Maria Sharapova #2 Match data
Mar 24, 2013* Miami WTA 1000 F Hard Serena Williams #1 4-6 6-3 6-0 Maria Sharapova #2 Match data
Feb 16, 2013* Doha WTA 1000 SF Hard Serena Williams #2 6-3 6-2 Maria Sharapova #3 Match data
Oct 30, 2012* WTA Championships WTA Finals F Hard Serena Williams #3 6-4 6-3 Maria Sharapova #2 Match data
May 12, 2012* Madrid WTA 1000 QF Clay Serena Williams #9 6-1 6-3 Maria Sharapova #2 Match data
Jul 30, 2011* Stanford WTA 500 QF Hard Serena Williams #169 6-1 6-3 Maria Sharapova #5 Match data
Jun 29, 2010* Wimbledon Grand Slam R16 Grass Serena Williams #1 7-6(9) 6-4 Maria Sharapova #17 Match data
Apr 19, 2008* Charleston WTA 1000 QF Clay Serena Williams #9 7-5 4-6 6-1 Maria Sharapova #4 Match data
Mar 23, 2007* Miami WTA 1000 R16 Hard Serena Williams #18 6-1 6-1 Maria Sharapova #2 Match data
Jan 27, 2007* Australian Open Grand Slam F Hard Serena Williams #81 6-1 6-2 Maria Sharapova #2 Match data
Jan 28, 2005* Australian Open Grand Slam SF Hard Serena Williams #7 2-6 7-5 8-6 Maria Sharapova #4 Match data
Nov 18, 2004* WTA Tour Championships WTA Finals F Hard Maria Sharapova #4 4-6 6-2 6-4 Serena Williams #7 Match data
Jul 5, 2004* Wimbledon Grand Slam F Grass Maria Sharapova #8 6-1 6-4 Serena Williams #14 Match data
Mar 28, 2004* Miami WTA 1000 R16 Hard Serena Williams #6 6-4 6-3 Maria Sharapova #23 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Serena Williams #320 #1 13,615 2,405 825 170 82.9% 23 23 5 17 3 71
Maria Sharapova #373 #1 10,690 2,238 596 174 77.4% 5 14 1 9 7 36

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Serena Williams Maria Sharapova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1997 3–2 60.0% #101 1,582 0 0 2002 1–2 33.3% #188 1,503 0 0
16 1998 26–11 70.3% #20 1,895 0 0 2003 24–12 66.7% #32 1,779 0 2
17 1999 37–7 84.1% #4 2,170 1 4 2004 55–16 77.5% #4 2,063 1 7
18 2000 37–8 82.2% #6 2,174 1 7 2005 53–13 80.3% #4 2,068 1 10
19 2001 40–7 85.1% #6 2,259 1 10 2006 59–10 85.5% #2 2,210 2 15
20 2002 57–5 91.9% #1 2,348 4 18 2007 40–12 76.9% #5 2,113 2 16
21 2003 36–3 92.3% #3 2,369 6 22 2008 31–6 83.8% #9 2,098 3 19
22 2004 39–11 78.0% #7 2,192 6 24 2009 31–9 77.5% #14 2,050 3 20
23 2005 21–9 70.0% #11 2,028 7 25 2010 33–11 75.0% #18 1,981 3 22
24 2006 12–4 75.0% #95 2,016 7 25 2011 43–13 76.8% #4 1,993 3 24
25 2007 34–10 77.3% #7 2,058 8 27 2012 55–10 84.6% #2 2,155 4 27
26 2008 41–8 83.7% #2 2,109 9 31 2013 37–8 82.2% #4 2,136 4 29
27 2009 50–13 79.4% #1 2,106 11 34 2014 50–13 79.4% #2 2,093 5 33
28 2010 25–4 86.2% #4 2,149 13 36 2015 35–10 77.8% #4 2,044 5 35
29 2011 22–4 84.6% #12 2,155 13 38 2016 4–1 80.0% #91 2,049 5 35
30 2012 48–6 88.9% #3 2,239 15 44 2017 16–7 69.6% #61 1,976 5 36
31 2013 77–5 93.9% #1 2,345 17 55 2018 21–11 65.6% #29 1,929 5 36
32 2014 52–10 83.9% #1 2,209 18 62 2019 8–8 50.0% #133 1,858 5 36
33 2015 50–6 89.3% #1 2,197 21 67 2020 0–2 0.0% #373 1,820 5 36
34 2016 36–5 87.8% #2 2,177 22 69 — — — — — — —
35 2017 8–1 88.9% #22 2,172 23 70 — — — — — — —
36 2018 18–7 72.0% #16 2,078 23 70 — — — — — — —
37 2019 25–8 75.8% #10 2,052 23 70 — — — — — — —
38 2020 16–5 76.2% #11 1,991 23 71 — — — — — — —
39 2021 12–6 66.7% #41 1,950 23 71 — — — — — — —
40 2022 3–4 42.9% #320 1,891 23 71 — — — — — — —
44 2026 0–1 0.0% #320 — 23 71 — — — — — — —