H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Serena Williams vs Mary Joe Fernandez H2H: 0-1

Mary Joe Fernandez holds a 1–0 lead over Serena Williams in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mary Joe Fernandez leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Mary Joe Fernandez won the 1999 Roland Garros third round 6-3 1-6 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Serena Williams
USA Age 44 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Mary Joe Fernandez
Age 54 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 30, 1999* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay Mary Joe Fernandez #37 6-3 1-6 6-0 Serena Williams #10 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Serena Williams #320 #1 13,615 2,405 825 170 82.9% 23 23 5 17 3 71
Mary Joe Fernandez #136 #4 2,114 2,191 409 192 68.1% 0 3 0 1 3 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Serena Williams Mary Joe Fernandez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
12 — — — — — — — 1984 0–2 0.0% — 1,475 0 0
13 — — — — — — — 1985 5–6 45.5% #99 1,554 0 0
14 — — — — — — — 1986 18–14 56.2% #27 1,764 0 0
15 1997 3–2 60.0% #101 1,582 0 0 1987 24–14 63.2% #20 1,895 0 0
16 1998 26–11 70.3% #20 1,895 0 0 1988 22–11 66.7% #15 1,922 0 0
17 1999 37–7 84.1% #4 2,170 1 4 1989 32–15 68.1% #12 1,977 0 0
18 2000 37–8 82.2% #6 2,174 1 7 1990 40–10 80.0% #4 2,123 0 2
19 2001 40–7 85.1% #6 2,259 1 10 1991 47–18 72.3% #8 2,062 0 2
20 2002 57–5 91.9% #1 2,348 4 18 1992 47–16 74.6% #6 2,108 0 2
21 2003 36–3 92.3% #3 2,369 6 22 1993 34–13 72.3% #7 2,054 0 3
22 2004 39–11 78.0% #7 2,192 6 24 1994 21–9 70.0% #14 1,975 0 4
23 2005 21–9 70.0% #11 2,028 7 25 1995 29–11 72.5% #8 2,038 0 6
24 2006 12–4 75.0% #95 2,016 7 25 1996 26–15 63.4% #16 1,926 0 6
25 2007 34–10 77.3% #7 2,058 8 27 1997 39–16 70.9% #10 1,987 0 7
26 2008 41–8 83.7% #2 2,109 9 31 1998 8–8 50.0% #77 1,932 0 7
27 2009 50–13 79.4% #1 2,106 11 34 1999 17–13 56.7% #38 1,890 0 7
28 2010 25–4 86.2% #4 2,149 13 36 2000 0–1 0.0% #136 1,869 0 7
29 2011 22–4 84.6% #12 2,155 13 38 — — — — — — —
30 2012 48–6 88.9% #3 2,239 15 44 — — — — — — —
31 2013 77–5 93.9% #1 2,345 17 55 — — — — — — —
32 2014 52–10 83.9% #1 2,209 18 62 — — — — — — —
33 2015 50–6 89.3% #1 2,197 21 67 — — — — — — —
34 2016 36–5 87.8% #2 2,177 22 69 — — — — — — —
35 2017 8–1 88.9% #22 2,172 23 70 — — — — — — —
36 2018 18–7 72.0% #16 2,078 23 70 — — — — — — —
37 2019 25–8 75.8% #10 2,052 23 70 — — — — — — —
38 2020 16–5 76.2% #11 1,991 23 71 — — — — — — —
39 2021 12–6 66.7% #41 1,950 23 71 — — — — — — —
40 2022 3–4 42.9% #320 1,891 23 71 — — — — — — —
44 2026 0–1 0.0% #320 — 23 71 — — — — — — —