H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Serena Williams vs Mary Pierce H2H: 5-1

Serena Williams holds a 5–1 lead over Mary Pierce in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Serena Williams leads 3–0 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Serena Williams won the 2005 Amelia Island fourth round 7-6(5) 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Serena Williams
USA Age 44 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
5 – 1
6 main draw meetings
Mary Pierce
FRA Age 51 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 8, 2005* Amelia Island WTA 500 R16 Clay Serena Williams #4 7-6(5) 6-4 Mary Pierce #27 Match data
Apr 8, 2004* Amelia Island WTA 500 R32 Clay Serena Williams #7 6-3 6-1 Mary Pierce #29 Match data
Jun 6, 2002* Roland Garros Grand Slam QF Clay Serena Williams #3 6-1 6-1 Mary Pierce #132 Match data
Mar 15, 2000* Indian Wells WTA 1000 QF Hard Mary Pierce #6 6-2 6-1 Serena Williams #4 Match data
Mar 10, 1999* Indian Wells WTA 1000 QF Hard Serena Williams #21 7-5 7-6 Mary Pierce #8 Match data
Nov 7, 1997* Chicago WTA 250 R16 Carpet Serena Williams #304 6-3 7-6 Mary Pierce #7 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Serena Williams #320 #1 13,615 2,405 825 170 82.9% 23 23 5 17 3 71
Mary Pierce #560 #3 3,797 2,137 460 215 68.1% 2 5 0 3 8 18

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Serena Williams Mary Pierce
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1989 0–3 0.0% #243 1,480 0 0
15 1997 3–2 60.0% #101 1,582 0 0 1990 6–7 46.2% #107 1,543 0 0
16 1998 26–11 70.3% #20 1,895 0 0 1991 21–9 70.0% #26 1,786 0 1
17 1999 37–7 84.1% #4 2,170 1 4 1992 31–9 77.5% #13 1,901 0 4
18 2000 37–8 82.2% #6 2,174 1 7 1993 38–15 71.7% #12 2,003 0 5
19 2001 40–7 85.1% #6 2,259 1 10 1994 43–16 72.9% #5 2,053 0 5
20 2002 57–5 91.9% #1 2,348 4 18 1995 35–14 71.4% #5 2,008 1 7
21 2003 36–3 92.3% #3 2,369 6 22 1996 17–11 60.7% #24 1,899 1 7
22 2004 39–11 78.0% #7 2,192 6 24 1997 45–15 75.0% #7 2,053 1 8
23 2005 21–9 70.0% #11 2,028 7 25 1998 35–12 74.5% #7 2,120 1 12
24 2006 12–4 75.0% #95 2,016 7 25 1999 45–19 70.3% #5 2,053 1 13
25 2007 34–10 77.3% #7 2,058 8 27 2000 29–11 72.5% #7 2,033 2 15
26 2008 41–8 83.7% #2 2,109 9 31 2001 6–8 42.9% #129 1,839 2 15
27 2009 50–13 79.4% #1 2,106 11 34 2002 14–13 51.9% #52 1,752 2 15
28 2010 25–4 86.2% #4 2,149 13 36 2003 23–17 57.5% #33 1,786 2 15
29 2011 22–4 84.6% #12 2,155 13 38 2004 22–16 57.9% #29 1,754 2 16
30 2012 48–6 88.9% #3 2,239 15 44 2005 41–12 77.4% #5 2,119 2 18
31 2013 77–5 93.9% #1 2,345 17 55 2006 9–8 52.9% #79 1,967 2 18
32 2014 52–10 83.9% #1 2,209 18 62 — — — — — — —
33 2015 50–6 89.3% #1 2,197 21 67 — — — — — — —
34 2016 36–5 87.8% #2 2,177 22 69 — — — — — — —
35 2017 8–1 88.9% #22 2,172 23 70 — — — — — — —
36 2018 18–7 72.0% #16 2,078 23 70 — — — — — — —
37 2019 25–8 75.8% #10 2,052 23 70 — — — — — — —
38 2020 16–5 76.2% #11 1,991 23 71 — — — — — — —
39 2021 12–6 66.7% #41 1,950 23 71 — — — — — — —
40 2022 3–4 42.9% #320 1,891 23 71 — — — — — — —
44 2026 0–1 0.0% #320 — 23 71 — — — — — — —