H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Serena Williams vs Mirjana Lucic-Baroni H2H: 3-0

Serena Williams holds a 3–0 lead over Mirjana Lucic-Baroni in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Serena Williams leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Serena Williams won the 2017 Australian Open semifinal 6-2 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Serena Williams
USA Age 44 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main draw meetings
Mirjana Lucic-Baroni
CRO Age 44 Right-Handed 181 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 28, 2017* Australian Open Grand Slam SF Hard Serena Williams #2 6-2 6-1 Mirjana Lucic-Baroni #79 Match data
Jun 26, 1998* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Serena Williams #20 6-3 6-0 Mirjana Lucic-Baroni #46 Match data
Jan 14, 1998* Sydney WTA 500 R32 Hard Serena Williams #96 3-6 6-4 7-5 Mirjana Lucic-Baroni #48 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Serena Williams #320 #1 13,615 2,405 825 170 82.9% 23 23 5 17 3 71
Mirjana Lucic-Baroni #424 #20 1,924 1,798 136 166 45.0% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Serena Williams Mirjana Lucic-Baroni
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1997 3–2 60.0% #101 1,582 0 0 1997 11–3 78.6% #49 1,692 0 1
16 1998 26–11 70.3% #20 1,895 0 0 1998 15–11 57.7% #51 1,776 0 2
17 1999 37–7 84.1% #4 2,170 1 4 1999 11–13 45.8% #48 1,757 0 2
18 2000 37–8 82.2% #6 2,174 1 7 2000 2–12 14.3% #202 1,601 0 2
19 2001 40–7 85.1% #6 2,259 1 10 2001 2–3 40.0% #192 1,596 0 2
20 2002 57–5 91.9% #1 2,348 4 18 2002 1–6 14.3% #203 1,546 0 2
21 2003 36–3 92.3% #3 2,369 6 22 2003 0–2 0.0% #348 1,526 0 2
22 2004 39–11 78.0% #7 2,192 6 24 — — — — — — —
23 2005 21–9 70.0% #11 2,028 7 25 — — — — — — —
24 2006 12–4 75.0% #95 2,016 7 25 — — — — — — —
25 2007 34–10 77.3% #7 2,058 8 27 2007 1–1 50.0% #455 1,538 0 2
26 2008 41–8 83.7% #2 2,109 9 31 — — — — — — —
27 2009 50–13 79.4% #1 2,106 11 34 2009 0–1 0.0% #258 1,519 0 2
28 2010 25–4 86.2% #4 2,149 13 36 2010 5–6 45.5% #96 1,554 0 2
29 2011 22–4 84.6% #12 2,155 13 38 2011 8–14 36.4% #129 1,551 0 2
30 2012 48–6 88.9% #3 2,239 15 44 2012 7–12 36.8% #105 1,535 0 2
31 2013 77–5 93.9% #1 2,345 17 55 2013 8–11 42.1% #110 1,563 0 2
32 2014 52–10 83.9% #1 2,209 18 62 2014 12–8 60.0% #60 1,706 0 3
33 2015 50–6 89.3% #1 2,197 21 67 2015 17–26 39.5% #68 1,657 0 3
34 2016 36–5 87.8% #2 2,177 22 69 2016 14–18 43.8% #80 1,629 0 3
35 2017 8–1 88.9% #22 2,172 23 70 2017 20–16 55.6% #32 1,698 0 3
36 2018 18–7 72.0% #16 2,078 23 70 2018 2–3 40.0% #327 1,689 0 3
37 2019 25–8 75.8% #10 2,052 23 70 — — — — — — —
38 2020 16–5 76.2% #11 1,991 23 71 — — — — — — —
39 2021 12–6 66.7% #41 1,950 23 71 — — — — — — —
40 2022 3–4 42.9% #320 1,891 23 71 — — — — — — —
44 2026 0–1 0.0% #320 — 23 71 — — — — — — —