H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Serena Williams vs Nathalie Dechy H2H: 5-0

Serena Williams holds a 5–0 lead over Nathalie Dechy in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Serena Williams leads 2–0 on clay and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Serena Williams won the 2003 Rome fourth round 6-3 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Serena Williams
USA Age 44 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
5 – 0
5 main draw meetings
Nathalie Dechy
FRA Age 47 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 16, 2003* Rome WTA 1000 R16 Clay Serena Williams #1 6-3 6-0 Nathalie Dechy #24 Match data
Sep 1, 2002* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Serena Williams #1 6-1 6-1 Nathalie Dechy #26 Match data
Aug 8, 2002* Los Angeles WTA 500 R16 Hard Serena Williams #1 6-2 6-1 Nathalie Dechy #27 Match data
Apr 19, 2002* Charleston WTA 1000 R16 Clay Serena Williams #7 7-6(3) 6-3 Nathalie Dechy #32 Match data
Feb 27, 1999* Paris WTA 500 SF Carpet Serena Williams #24 6-1 6-4 Nathalie Dechy #43 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Serena Williams #320 #1 13,615 2,405 825 170 82.9% 23 23 5 17 3 71
Nathalie Dechy #88 #11 1,773 1,917 291 270 51.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Serena Williams Nathalie Dechy
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1997 3–2 60.0% #101 1,582 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1998 26–11 70.3% #20 1,895 0 0 1995 0–2 0.0% #237 1,481 0 0
17 1999 37–7 84.1% #4 2,170 1 4 1996 6–11 35.3% #84 1,501 0 0
18 2000 37–8 82.2% #6 2,174 1 7 1997 6–11 35.3% #73 1,539 0 0
19 2001 40–7 85.1% #6 2,259 1 10 1998 12–17 41.4% #50 1,619 0 0
20 2002 57–5 91.9% #1 2,348 4 18 1999 32–23 58.2% #25 1,790 0 0
21 2003 36–3 92.3% #3 2,369 6 22 2000 28–19 59.6% #26 1,777 0 0
22 2004 39–11 78.0% #7 2,192 6 24 2001 21–25 45.7% #43 1,626 0 0
23 2005 21–9 70.0% #11 2,028 7 25 2002 33–24 57.9% #20 1,770 0 0
24 2006 12–4 75.0% #95 2,016 7 25 2003 31–18 63.3% #29 1,819 0 1
25 2007 34–10 77.3% #7 2,058 8 27 2004 33–23 58.9% #21 1,810 0 1
26 2008 41–8 83.7% #2 2,109 9 31 2005 40–26 60.6% #12 1,798 0 1
27 2009 50–13 79.4% #1 2,106 11 34 2006 16–25 39.0% #48 1,649 0 1
28 2010 25–4 86.2% #4 2,149 13 36 2007 16–19 45.7% #68 1,651 0 1
29 2011 22–4 84.6% #12 2,155 13 38 2008 13–16 44.8% #69 1,670 0 1
30 2012 48–6 88.9% #3 2,239 15 44 2009 4–11 26.7% #88 1,582 0 1
31 2013 77–5 93.9% #1 2,345 17 55 — — — — — — —
32 2014 52–10 83.9% #1 2,209 18 62 — — — — — — —
33 2015 50–6 89.3% #1 2,197 21 67 — — — — — — —
34 2016 36–5 87.8% #2 2,177 22 69 — — — — — — —
35 2017 8–1 88.9% #22 2,172 23 70 — — — — — — —
36 2018 18–7 72.0% #16 2,078 23 70 — — — — — — —
37 2019 25–8 75.8% #10 2,052 23 70 — — — — — — —
38 2020 16–5 76.2% #11 1,991 23 71 — — — — — — —
39 2021 12–6 66.7% #41 1,950 23 71 — — — — — — —
40 2022 3–4 42.9% #320 1,891 23 71 — — — — — — —
44 2026 0–1 0.0% #320 — 23 71 — — — — — — —