H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Serena Williams vs Nicole Pratt H2H: 5-0

Serena Williams holds a 5–0 lead over Nicole Pratt in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Serena Williams leads 5–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Serena Williams won the 2002 Tokyo quarterfinal 6-1 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Serena Williams
USA Age 44 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
5 – 0
5 main draw meetings
Nicole Pratt
AUS Age 53 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 21, 2002* Tokyo WTA 500 QF Hard Serena Williams #1 6-1 6-0 Nicole Pratt #46 Match data
Mar 2, 2002* Scottsdale WTA 500 QF Hard Serena Williams #9 6-2 7-5 Nicole Pratt #42 Match data
Aug 10, 2001* Los Angeles WTA 500 R16 Hard Serena Williams #8 6-3 6-3 Nicole Pratt #77 Match data
Jan 20, 2000* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Serena Williams #4 7-5 6-1 Nicole Pratt #58 Match data
Sep 2, 1998* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Serena Williams #20 6-3 3-6 6-4 Nicole Pratt #94 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Serena Williams #320 #1 13,615 2,405 825 170 82.9% 23 23 5 17 3 71
Nicole Pratt #1,043 #35 924 1,764 156 217 41.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Serena Williams Nicole Pratt
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1997 3–2 60.0% #101 1,582 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1998 26–11 70.3% #20 1,895 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1999 37–7 84.1% #4 2,170 1 4 1990 1–1 50.0% #201 1,497 0 0
18 2000 37–8 82.2% #6 2,174 1 7 1991 1–7 12.5% #201 1,469 0 0
19 2001 40–7 85.1% #6 2,259 1 10 1992 3–3 50.0% #203 1,491 0 0
20 2002 57–5 91.9% #1 2,348 4 18 1993 2–5 28.6% #172 1,486 0 0
21 2003 36–3 92.3% #3 2,369 6 22 1994 2–5 28.6% #224 1,465 0 0
22 2004 39–11 78.0% #7 2,192 6 24 1995 0–2 0.0% #214 1,451 0 0
23 2005 21–9 70.0% #11 2,028 7 25 1996 0–2 0.0% #194 1,434 0 0
24 2006 12–4 75.0% #95 2,016 7 25 1997 5–4 55.6% #110 1,494 0 0
25 2007 34–10 77.3% #7 2,058 8 27 1998 4–13 23.5% #113 1,464 0 0
26 2008 41–8 83.7% #2 2,109 9 31 1999 15–17 46.9% #56 1,598 0 0
27 2009 50–13 79.4% #1 2,106 11 34 2000 16–23 41.0% #54 1,621 0 0
28 2010 25–4 86.2% #4 2,149 13 36 2001 22–23 48.9% #51 1,704 0 0
29 2011 22–4 84.6% #12 2,155 13 38 2002 23–20 53.5% #48 1,719 0 0
30 2012 48–6 88.9% #3 2,239 15 44 2003 17–23 42.5% #53 1,646 0 0
31 2013 77–5 93.9% #1 2,345 17 55 2004 19–21 47.5% #50 1,604 0 1
32 2014 52–10 83.9% #1 2,209 18 62 2005 8–17 32.0% #126 1,544 0 1
33 2015 50–6 89.3% #1 2,197 21 67 2006 8–12 40.0% #77 1,546 0 1
34 2016 36–5 87.8% #2 2,177 22 69 2007 10–16 38.5% #70 1,566 0 1
35 2017 8–1 88.9% #22 2,172 23 70 2008 0–3 0.0% #1043 1,545 0 1
36 2018 18–7 72.0% #16 2,078 23 70 — — — — — — —
37 2019 25–8 75.8% #10 2,052 23 70 — — — — — — —
38 2020 16–5 76.2% #11 1,991 23 71 — — — — — — —
39 2021 12–6 66.7% #41 1,950 23 71 — — — — — — —
40 2022 3–4 42.9% #320 1,891 23 71 — — — — — — —
44 2026 0–1 0.0% #320 — 23 71 — — — — — — —