H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC

Serena Williams vs Silvia Farina Elia H2H: 1-1

Serena Williams and Silvia Farina Elia are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Silvia Farina Elia leads 1–0 on clay, while Serena Williams leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Silvia Farina Elia won the 2005 Amelia Island quarterfinal 5-7 7-6(7) RET.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Serena Williams
USA Age 44 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Silvia Farina Elia
ITA Age 54 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 9, 2005* Amelia Island WTA 500 QF Clay Silvia Farina Elia #24 5-7 7-6(7) (ret.) Serena Williams #4 Match data
Nov 4, 2001* WTA Tour Championships WTA Finals R16 Hard Serena Williams #10 6-0 6-2 Silvia Farina Elia #15 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Serena Williams #320 #1 13,615 2,405 825 170 82.9% 23 23 5 17 3 71
Silvia Farina Elia #32 #11 1,838 1,943 365 309 54.2% 0 0 0 3 0 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Serena Williams Silvia Farina Elia
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1997 3–2 60.0% #101 1,582 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1998 26–11 70.3% #20 1,895 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1999 37–7 84.1% #4 2,170 1 4 1989 3–3 50.0% #172 1,522 0 0
18 2000 37–8 82.2% #6 2,174 1 7 1990 2–3 40.0% #194 1,527 0 0
19 2001 40–7 85.1% #6 2,259 1 10 1991 9–9 50.0% #69 1,590 0 0
20 2002 57–5 91.9% #1 2,348 4 18 1992 5–10 33.3% #172 1,578 0 0
21 2003 36–3 92.3% #3 2,369 6 22 1993 9–12 42.9% #85 1,587 0 0
22 2004 39–11 78.0% #7 2,192 6 24 1994 20–19 51.3% #52 1,678 0 0
23 2005 21–9 70.0% #11 2,028 7 25 1995 18–16 52.9% #52 1,650 0 0
24 2006 12–4 75.0% #95 2,016 7 25 1996 22–21 51.2% #34 1,711 0 0
25 2007 34–10 77.3% #7 2,058 8 27 1997 16–22 42.1% #43 1,720 0 0
26 2008 41–8 83.7% #2 2,109 9 31 1998 38–26 59.4% #19 1,901 0 0
27 2009 50–13 79.4% #1 2,106 11 34 1999 30–26 53.6% #26 1,782 0 0
28 2010 25–4 86.2% #4 2,149 13 36 2000 15–17 46.9% #63 1,695 0 0
29 2011 22–4 84.6% #12 2,155 13 38 2001 45–26 63.4% #14 1,768 0 1
30 2012 48–6 88.9% #3 2,239 15 44 2002 42–28 60.0% #17 1,745 0 2
31 2013 77–5 93.9% #1 2,345 17 55 2003 25–25 50.0% #24 1,719 0 3
32 2014 52–10 83.9% #1 2,209 18 62 2004 41–23 64.1% #20 1,770 0 3
33 2015 50–6 89.3% #1 2,197 21 67 2005 25–23 52.1% #32 1,648 0 3
34 2016 36–5 87.8% #2 2,177 22 69 — — — — — — —
35 2017 8–1 88.9% #22 2,172 23 70 — — — — — — —
36 2018 18–7 72.0% #16 2,078 23 70 — — — — — — —
37 2019 25–8 75.8% #10 2,052 23 70 — — — — — — —
38 2020 16–5 76.2% #11 1,991 23 71 — — — — — — —
39 2021 12–6 66.7% #41 1,950 23 71 — — — — — — —
40 2022 3–4 42.9% #320 1,891 23 71 — — — — — — —
44 2026 0–1 0.0% #320 — 23 71 — — — — — — —