H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Serena Williams vs Venus Williams H2H: 20-13 (incl. walkovers)

Serena Williams vs Venus Williams: 19–12 excluding walkovers; 20–13 including 2 walkovers. Across 33 main-draw results including walkovers, Serena Williams leads 14–9 on hard courts and 4–2 on grass. Most recently, Serena Williams won the 2020 Lexington second round 3-6 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Serena Williams
USA Age 44 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H including walkovers
20 – 13
33 main-draw results
Venus Williams
United States Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Serena Williams #9 3-6 6-3 6-4 Venus Williams #67 Match data Aug 14, 2020* R16 Lexington International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Venus Williams #50 (w/o) Serena Williams #11 Match data May 16, 2019* R32 Italian Open Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay
Serena Williams #26 6-1 6-2 Venus Williams #16 Match data Sep 2, 2018* R32 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Venus Williams #8 6-3 6-4 Serena Williams Match data Mar 12, 2018* R32 Indian Wells Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Serena Williams #2 6-4 6-4 Venus Williams #17 Match data Jan 29, 2017* F Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Serena Williams #1 6-2 1-6 6-3 Venus Williams #23 Match data Sep 10, 2015* QF US Open Grand Slam Hard
Serena Williams #1 6-4 6-3 Venus Williams #16 Match data Jul 7, 2015* R16 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Venus Williams #26 6-7(2) 6-2 6-3 Serena Williams #1 Match data Aug 9, 2014* SF Canadian Open Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Serena Williams #1 6-1 6-2 Venus Williams #24 Match data Apr 6, 2013* SF Charleston Open Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Clay
Serena Williams #2 6-2 7-6(4) Venus Williams #7 Match data Nov 1, 2009* F WTA Finals WTA Finals Hard
Serena Williams #2 5-7 6-4 7-6(4) Venus Williams #7 Match data Oct 26, 2009 RR WTA Finals WTA Finals Hard
Serena Williams #2 7-6(3) 6-2 Venus Williams #3 Match data Jul 5, 2009* F Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Serena Williams #1 6-4 3-6 6-3 Venus Williams #6 Match data Apr 4, 2009* SF Miami Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Venus Williams #6 6-1 2-6 7-6(3) Serena Williams #1 Match data Feb 20, 2009* SF Dubai Tennis Championships Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Venus Williams #8 5-7 6-1 6-0 Serena Williams #3 Match data Nov 3, 2008 RR WTA Finals WTA Finals Hard
Serena Williams #3 7-6(6) 7-6(7) Venus Williams #8 Match data Sep 4, 2008* QF US Open Grand Slam Hard
Venus Williams #7 7-5 6-4 Serena Williams #6 Match data Jul 5, 2008* F Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Serena Williams #11 6-3 3-6 7-6(4) Venus Williams #7 Match data Mar 8, 2008* SF Bangalore Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Venus Williams #10 7-6(5) 6-2 Serena Williams #8 Match data Sep 6, 2005* R16 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Venus Williams #9 6-1 7-6(8) Serena Williams #4 Match data Mar 28, 2005* QF Miami Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Serena Williams #1 4-6 6-4 6-2 Venus Williams #4 Match data Jul 7, 2003* F Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Serena Williams #1 7-6(4) 3-6 6-4 Venus Williams #2 Match data Jan 27, 2003* F Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Serena Williams #1 6-4 6-3 Venus Williams #2 Match data Sep 8, 2002* F US Open Grand Slam Hard
Serena Williams #1 7-6(4) 6-3 Venus Williams #2 Match data Jul 8, 2002* F Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Serena Williams #3 7-5 6-3 Venus Williams #2 Match data Jun 9, 2002* F Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Serena Williams #9 6-2 6-2 Venus Williams #2 Match data Mar 23, 2002* SF Miami Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Venus Williams #4 6-2 6-4 Serena Williams #10 Match data Sep 9, 2001* F US Open Grand Slam Hard
Serena Williams #10 (w/o) Venus Williams #3 Match data Mar 8, 2001 SF Indian Wells Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Venus Williams #5 6-2 7-6 Serena Williams #8 Match data Jul 8, 2000* SF Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Serena Williams #4 6-1 3-6 6-3 Venus Williams #3 Match data Oct 3, 1999 F Grand Slam Cup WTA Finals Hard
Venus Williams #6 6-1 4-6 6-4 Serena Williams #16 Match data Mar 24, 1999* F Key Biscayne Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Venus Williams #9 6-4 6-2 Serena Williams #31 Match data May 9, 1998* QF Italian Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay
Venus Williams #16 7-6(4) 6-1 Serena Williams #53 Match data Jan 23, 1998* R64 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS Olympics 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Serena Williams #320 #1 13,615 2,399 837 172 83.0% 23 1 23 6 18 2 73
Venus Williams #469 #1 7,452 2,368 782 299 72.3% 7 1 9 2 19 11 49

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Serena Williams Venus Williams
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1994 1–1 50.0% — 1,525 0 0
15 1997 3–2 60.0% #101 1,582 0 0 1995 2–3 40.0% #205 1,561 0 0
16 1998 26–11 70.3% #20 1,893 0 0 1996 2–5 28.6% #216 1,570 0 0
17 1999 38–7 84.4% #4 2,189 1 5 1997 20–13 60.6% #22 1,830 0 0
18 2000 37–8 82.2% #6 2,184 1 8 1998 51–13 79.7% #5 2,099 0 3
19 2001 40–7 85.1% #6 2,237 1 11 1999 57–12 82.6% #3 2,248 0 9
20 2002 57–5 91.9% #1 2,339 4 19 2000 41–4 91.1% #3 2,337 2 15
21 2003 36–3 92.3% #3 2,365 6 23 2001 46–6 88.5% #3 2,358 4 21
22 2004 39–11 78.0% #7 2,225 6 25 2002 63–9 87.5% #2 2,303 4 28
23 2005 21–9 70.0% #11 2,101 7 26 2003 24–5 82.8% #11 2,260 4 29
24 2006 12–4 75.0% #95 2,063 7 26 2004 42–14 75.0% #9 2,077 4 31
25 2007 34–10 77.3% #7 2,077 8 28 2005 34–10 77.3% #10 2,128 5 33
26 2008 44–9 83.0% #2 2,126 9 32 2006 13–6 68.4% #46 2,035 5 33
27 2009 50–13 79.4% #1 2,120 11 35 2007 46–10 82.1% #8 2,059 6 36
28 2010 25–4 86.2% #4 2,158 13 37 2008 40–11 78.4% #6 2,138 7 39
29 2011 22–4 84.6% #12 2,182 13 39 2009 38–16 70.4% #6 1,988 7 41
30 2012 54–6 90.0% #3 2,302 15 46 2010 38–7 84.4% #5 2,061 7 43
31 2013 77–5 93.9% #1 2,382 17 57 2011 8–4 66.7% #102 2,017 7 43
32 2014 52–10 83.9% #1 2,272 18 64 2012 24–9 72.7% #24 2,016 7 44
33 2015 50–6 89.3% #1 2,292 21 69 2013 15–11 57.7% #47 1,910 7 44
34 2016 38–6 86.4% #2 2,208 22 71 2014 33–15 68.8% #18 1,888 7 45
35 2017 8–1 88.9% #22 2,200 23 72 2015 39–14 73.6% #7 1,971 7 48
36 2018 18–7 72.0% #16 2,112 23 72 2016 24–15 61.5% #17 1,817 7 49
37 2019 25–8 75.8% #10 2,093 23 72 2017 38–15 71.7% #5 1,941 7 49
38 2020 16–5 76.2% #11 2,045 23 73 2018 15–11 57.7% #39 1,872 7 49
39 2021 12–6 66.7% #41 1,994 23 73 2019 20–15 57.1% #52 1,819 7 49
40 2022 3–4 42.9% #320 1,926 23 73 2020 1–8 11.1% #79 1,713 7 49
41 — — — — — — — 2021 3–9 25.0% #318 1,647 7 49
42 — — — — — — — 2022 0–4 0.0% #1000 1,602 7 49
43 — — — — — — — 2023 3–7 30.0% #412 1,592 7 49

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Serena Williams Venus Williams
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 — — — — — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
15 1997 — — — — — — — — — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 1995 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
16 1998 16 7 23 69.6% 6 2 8 75.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 1996 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1999 27 4 31 87.1% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 5 0 5 100.0% 1997 15 7 22 68.2% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0%
18 2000 29 5 34 85.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 1 6 83.3% 3 1 4 75.0% 1998 36 8 44 81.8% 9 2 11 81.8% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7%
19 2001 32 5 37 86.5% 4 1 5 80.0% 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — 1999 34 6 40 85.0% 12 2 14 85.7% 4 1 5 80.0% 7 3 10 70.0%
20 2002 28 3 31 90.3% 18 2 20 90.0% 7 0 7 100.0% 4 0 4 100.0% 2000 25 0 25 100.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 7 0 7 100.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
21 2003 13 0 13 100.0% 12 3 15 80.0% 7 0 7 100.0% 4 0 4 100.0% 2001 32 3 35 91.4% 5 2 7 71.4% 7 0 7 100.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
22 2004 23 6 29 79.3% 10 4 14 71.4% 6 1 7 85.7% — — — — 2002 35 5 40 87.5% 14 2 16 87.5% 6 1 7 85.7% 8 1 9 88.9%
23 2005 16 5 21 76.2% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 2003 8 2 10 80.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 6 1 7 85.7% 4 0 4 100.0%
24 2006 12 4 16 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 21 9 30 70.0% 17 2 19 89.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
25 2007 24 6 30 80.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — 2005 18 7 25 72.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 7 0 7 100.0% — — — —
26 2008 27 5 32 84.4% 11 3 14 78.6% 6 1 7 85.7% — — — — 2006 1 2 3 33.3% 10 3 13 76.9% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
27 2009 36 8 44 81.8% 4 4 8 50.0% 7 0 7 100.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 2007 27 5 32 84.4% 12 5 17 70.6% 7 0 7 100.0% — — — —
28 2010 10 1 11 90.9% 8 3 11 72.7% 7 0 7 100.0% — — — — 2008 29 9 38 76.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 7 0 7 100.0% — — — —
29 2011 18 2 20 90.0% — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2009 21 11 32 65.6% 11 4 15 73.3% 6 1 7 85.7% — — — —
30 2012 26 4 30 86.7% 15 2 17 88.2% 13 0 13 100.0% — — — — 2010 19 3 22 86.4% 15 3 18 83.3% 4 1 5 80.0% — — — —
31 2013 46 4 50 92.0% 28 0 28 100.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 2011 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
32 2014 41 6 47 87.2% 9 3 12 75.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2012 14 3 17 82.4% 8 4 12 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
33 2015 30 3 33 90.9% 13 3 16 81.3% 7 0 7 100.0% — — — — 2013 12 8 20 60.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — —
34 2016 20 5 25 80.0% 11 1 12 91.7% 7 0 7 100.0% — — — — 2014 27 11 38 71.1% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
35 2017 8 1 9 88.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 34 10 44 77.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
36 2018 9 5 14 64.3% 3 1 4 75.0% 6 1 7 85.7% — — — — 2016 14 11 25 56.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 5 1 6 83.3% — — — —
37 2019 16 5 21 76.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 6 1 7 85.7% — — — — 2017 26 11 37 70.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 6 1 7 85.7% — — — —
38 2020 15 4 19 78.9% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2018 12 7 19 63.2% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
39 2021 8 2 10 80.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2019 16 11 27 59.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
40 2022 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2020 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 2 4 6 33.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
Career — 533 103 636 83.8% 174 47 221 78.7% 107 17 124 86.3% 23 5 28 82.1% — 487 189 676 72.0% 163 69 232 70.3% 98 27 125 78.4% 34 14 48 70.8%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 633/768 of Serena Williams's and 581/732 of Venus Williams's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Serena Williams Venus Williams
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
21 2003 13/39 3.9 2.1 61.7% 74.0% 52.8% 63.9% 58.8% 66.1% 51.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2004 16/50 6.4 2.6 61.3% 73.3% 51.5% 64.8% 54.6% 64.9% 49.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2005 14/30 5.9 2.6 61.2% 74.1% 52.5% 68.0% 48.3% 65.1% 47.5% 2003 11/29 3.8 5.8 55.2% 76.2% 43.8% 53.3% 47.0% 61.6% 51.3%
24 2006 15/16 6.3 2.9 59.3% 74.2% 47.4% 54.7% 58.2% 63.1% 46.9% 2004 13/56 4.1 4.5 59.4% 72.2% 46.7% 41.6% 50.5% 61.9% 50.1%
25 2007 42/44 6.1 2.6 59.4% 69.2% 48.1% 58.2% 57.3% 60.8% 46.0% 2005 18/44 2.9 4.2 64.4% 70.7% 45.1% 63.1% 52.0% 61.3% 50.1%
26 2008 44/53 6.8 2.7 61.4% 73.4% 45.2% 60.0% 47.6% 62.7% 47.7% 2006 16/19 3.1 4.3 62.7% 68.3% 47.0% 52.8% 45.6% 60.6% 48.5%
27 2009 57/63 6.2 2.8 60.8% 75.0% 50.7% 54.5% 48.2% 65.3% 46.2% 2007 53/56 3.6 5.3 59.4% 72.6% 46.6% 56.6% 51.8% 62.2% 48.6%
28 2010 29/29 8.6 2.9 62.3% 77.4% 47.5% 66.0% 51.5% 66.4% 46.8% 2008 43/51 4.3 4.3 61.6% 72.0% 48.4% 55.6% 48.9% 62.7% 47.0%
29 2011 25/26 8.0 2.5 59.0% 79.5% 53.0% 67.2% 50.8% 68.7% 46.9% 2009 48/54 5.4 4.7 57.3% 73.4% 49.9% 59.5% 51.4% 63.3% 46.1%
30 2012 48/60 8.2 2.3 59.0% 78.7% 54.8% 66.6% 53.2% 68.8% 49.8% 2010 44/45 4.6 4.5 56.7% 73.5% 46.9% 53.7% 49.0% 61.9% 47.4%
31 2013 74/82 6.1 2.2 63.0% 76.5% 53.5% 60.3% 56.0% 68.1% 52.4% 2011 9/12 6.0 2.8 64.4% 72.3% 51.7% 60.3% 45.5% 64.5% 45.7%
32 2014 56/62 7.7 3.5 59.3% 76.5% 51.6% 64.4% 52.8% 66.3% 48.9% 2012 28/33 4.5 4.8 53.9% 68.9% 47.8% 50.7% 50.7% 59.2% 46.0%
33 2015 50/56 9.5 3.5 59.9% 76.7% 55.9% 67.3% 54.5% 68.4% 47.8% 2013 23/26 2.8 4.6 56.9% 65.4% 43.4% 55.0% 50.8% 56.0% 47.2%
34 2016 41/44 7.9 2.8 62.3% 77.4% 51.9% 58.8% 50.6% 68.0% 49.0% 2014 44/48 4.7 4.4 55.7% 71.6% 46.0% 56.6% 53.0% 60.4% 46.7%
35 2017 9/9 7.9 3.9 55.9% 79.6% 46.7% 57.9% 51.3% 65.7% 46.5% 2015 35/53 4.6 2.9 58.6% 70.6% 49.7% 50.2% 48.0% 62.1% 45.0%
36 2018 24/25 7.1 3.4 59.2% 74.2% 48.5% 55.3% 51.9% 63.9% 44.0% 2016 37/39 3.1 3.9 61.5% 65.5% 48.1% 52.8% 52.7% 58.4% 46.8%
37 2019 31/33 6.6 2.8 59.2% 76.5% 50.4% 50.4% 45.6% 65.5% 46.7% 2017 46/53 3.5 5.2 60.9% 69.2% 46.3% 59.1% 46.0% 60.2% 46.0%
38 2020 20/21 8.9 2.7 61.3% 73.3% 50.7% 71.0% 49.7% 64.3% 44.9% 2018 26/26 2.1 4.9 60.5% 63.9% 46.4% 53.6% 51.3% 56.7% 43.8%
39 2021 17/18 5.1 2.6 57.4% 72.6% 48.9% 43.6% 49.4% 62.4% 46.2% 2019 34/35 1.8 3.7 63.2% 63.3% 43.3% 54.0% 45.9% 56.0% 43.6%
40 2022 7/7 8.0 4.7 65.0% 68.0% 35.4% 62.0% 45.8% 56.6% 40.5% 2020 9/9 3.2 7.0 58.3% 63.2% 42.3% 61.2% 45.9% 54.5% 41.2%
41 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 12/12 3.4 4.4 62.1% 60.7% 37.2% 48.3% 44.1% 51.7% 39.2%
42 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 4/4 3.3 8.5 56.5% 65.1% 31.3% 49.0% 29.6% 50.4% 34.9%
43 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 10/10 3.6 4.4 60.1% 64.2% 38.7% 43.3% 39.2% 54.0% 40.5%
44 2026 1/1 7.0 7.0 79.0% 62.7% 45.0% 54.6% 27.3% 59.0% 38.2% 2024 2/2 4.5 8.0 59.1% 60.9% 29.6% 49.4% 70.0% 47.9% 40.9%
45 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2025 4/4 3.5 5.5 54.2% 62.5% 31.3% 31.2% 48.2% 48.5% 40.7%
46 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2026 12/12 3.0 4.4 59.2% 63.3% 37.8% 46.5% 43.3% 53.3% 37.0%
Career — 633/1,009 7.2 2.8 60.6% 75.5% 50.9% 60.9% 52.1% 65.8% 48.0% — 581/1,081 3.8 4.5 59.3% 69.4% 46.1% 54.4% 49.2% 59.8% 46.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Serena Williams Venus Williams
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1526 122.1 — — — — — — — 60.0% 0.00 0–1 — — -0.18
15 1997 1582 144.0 — — — — +42 — — 54.5% +0.82 1–0 1–1 — -0.18 1995 1561 123.9 — — — — +29 — — 36.4% -0.36 1–0 0–1 — -0.31
16 1998 1893 158.1 — — — — -62 -201 -189 64.6% +1.29 8–5 (62%) 2–3 (40%) 106.2 -1.19 1996 1570 134.2 — — — — +31 — — 46.7% +0.47 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — -0.34
17 1999 2189 178.2 — — — — +12 -418 — 80.2% +2.10 8–5 (62%) 6–0 (100%) 108.5 -2.69 1997 1831 160.2 — — — — +5 -255 -230 55.8% +0.44 8–5 (62%) 4–3 (57%) 108.3 -1.92
18 2000 2185 168.9 — — — — +24 — -372 80.6% +2.43 6–1 (86%) 4–3 (57%) 102.2 +0.57 1998 2100 174.0 — — — — +4 -331 -385 75.6% +2.04 9–4 (69%) 4–3 (57%) 108.8 -0.82
19 2001 2238 172.8 — — — — +36 -434 -326 79.2% +2.45 7–4 (64%) 5–5 (50%) 100.5 -2.79 1999 2248 179.2 — — — — +7 -300 -461 77.5% +1.83 10–5 (67%) 9–4 (69%) 105.8 -4.08
20 2002 2339 173.4 — — — — +18 -278 -232 87.1% +2.70 9–3 (75%) 11–1 (92%) 111.5 -2.86 2000 2337 171.5 — — — — +16 -397 -317 84.0% +2.34 8–2 (80%) 6–3 (67%) 106.2 -2.30
21 2003 2365 170.4 +7.11 +5.95 1.527 58.7% +80 -218 -130 86.0% +2.74 6–2 (75%) 2–0 — -1.67 2001 2358 172.4 — — — — +31 -379 -127 83.8% +2.48 8–1 (89%) 10–3 (77%) 106.1 -1.53
22 2004 2226 163.6 +6.68 +4.43 1.416 56.9% +107 -101 +86 74.8% +1.90 9–4 (69%) 4–3 (57%) 96.9 -0.38 2002 2303 175.2 — — — — +58 -205 -10 81.3% +2.44 12–4 (75%) 7–3 (70%) 101.1 -2.34
23 2005 2101 150.6 +5.70 +2.41 1.360 56.0% +157 -3 +122 70.0% +1.48 8–0 (100%) 1–6 (14%) 99.2 -0.26 2003 2261 155.8 +4.06 +5.13 1.337 56.1% +107 -163 +33 81.0% +2.37 4–3 (57%) 1–2 (33%) 97.7 -1.73
24 2006 2064 147.1 +4.12 +2.38 1.272 54.9% +120 — — 69.4% +1.75 3–1 (75%) 0–3 (0%) 96.2 -0.43 2004 2078 159.0 +4.27 +3.93 1.315 55.7% +59 +131 — 75.7% +1.99 6–3 (67%) 8–6 (57%) 99.4 +0.68
25 2007 2077 165.4 +4.80 +3.80 1.173 53.4% +88 +12 +155 78.3% +1.84 6–4 (60%) 9–3 (75%) 101.7 -2.31 2005 2128 165.4 +4.52 +4.90 1.293 55.5% +29 +38 +223 75.0% +2.03 6–4 (60%) 7–2 (78%) 102.9 -2.36
26 2008 2126 164.9 +6.89 +4.29 1.280 55.0% +42 -33 +130 80.0% +2.11 9–4 (69%) 5–2 (71%) 102.9 -1.00 2006 2035 136.6 +3.30 +3.85 1.231 54.0% +67 +87 +280 63.8% +0.94 5–4 (56%) 3–2 (60%) 97.6 -0.08
27 2009 2120 165.8 +9.20 +3.92 1.332 55.3% +59 -117 +157 75.6% +1.76 11–6 (65%) 8–8 (50%) 98.1 -2.33 2007 2059 153.9 +5.55 +3.98 1.286 55.2% +31 +23 +331 79.0% +2.10 6–6 (50%) 6–5 (55%) 95.6 -1.59
28 2010 2159 157.0 +8.78 +3.86 1.393 56.1% +37 -163 +212 79.1% +2.01 6–3 (67%) 10–2 (83%) 106.5 -1.14 2008 2138 163.5 +7.00 +3.95 1.260 54.6% -5 -109 +293 74.6% +1.81 7–5 (58%) 5–6 (45%) 99.1 -1.46
29 2011 2182 160.3 +9.93 +4.56 1.499 57.5% +57 — +125 78.9% +2.33 6–1 (86%) 3–2 (60%) 101.2 -0.27 2009 1989 162.7 +7.24 +2.88 1.255 54.5% +47 -3 +361 65.1% +1.53 13–10 (57%) 3–12 (20%) 88.0 -2.55
30 2012 2302 168.5 +11.57 +6.33 1.597 58.7% -26 -157 +62 88.2% +2.98 6–1 (86%) 3–2 (60%) 103.3 -2.18 2010 2062 156.7 +5.33 +3.88 1.244 54.7% +31 -11 +294 79.6% +1.80 6–2 (75%) 5–2 (71%) 104.0 +0.82
31 2013 2383 177.8 +12.05 +8.21 1.643 59.9% -2 -40 +41 89.7% +3.22 10–4 (71%) 3–3 (50%) 101.0 -0.69 2011 2018 120.4 +4.82 +1.85 1.287 54.7% +52 — +278 70.8% +1.58 3–1 (75%) 0–2 — +0.19
32 2014 2273 171.7 +9.98 +6.05 1.454 57.3% +55 +1 +33 83.6% +2.37 7–3 (70%) 8–0 (100%) 102.4 -0.53 2012 2016 150.4 +3.65 +3.04 1.127 52.6% +82 +19 +154 65.4% +1.15 9–3 (75%) 5–5 (50%) 99.5 -1.94
33 2015 2293 165.1 +9.57 +5.97 1.514 57.9% +37 -12 +16 81.3% +2.24 17–2 (89%) 7–2 (78%) 105.8 -0.61 2013 1911 141.0 +0.75 +3.14 1.071 51.5% +85 +50 — 58.1% +0.65 6–6 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 92.5 -0.63
34 2016 2208 161.7 +10.55 +5.23 1.529 57.9% +31 +121 +136 83.0% +2.39 4–2 (67%) 8–2 (80%) 100.3 -0.68 2014 1888 149.7 +4.15 +2.82 1.178 53.5% +57 +2 +268 66.4% +1.21 10–11 (48%) 5–6 (45%) 93.1 +0.59
35 2017 2201 137.8 +4.47 +1.79 1.354 56.0% +39 — — 89.5% +2.32 0–1 1–0 — -0.09 2015 1971 157.4 +3.80 +3.44 1.187 53.2% +43 -131 +141 67.2% +1.27 13–4 (76%) 10–5 (67%) 105.5 -0.59
36 2018 2112 148.0 +5.23 +2.07 1.220 53.7% +22 +268 +229 71.2% +1.29 3–1 (75%) 3–0 (100%) 102.0 -0.74 2016 1818 133.2 +2.07 +3.27 1.126 52.8% +13 +15 +295 62.0% +0.67 5–9 (36%) 11–4 (73%) 95.7 +1.30
37 2019 2094 156.8 +7.34 +3.63 1.352 55.6% +42 +282 +271 77.3% +2.05 7–1 (88%) — — -0.12 2017 1941 149.8 +3.49 +3.26 1.155 53.0% -13 -79 +233 67.8% +1.01 11–6 (65%) 11–3 (79%) 106.7 -0.36
38 2020 2046 143.2 +4.70 +1.29 1.259 54.8% +19 — — 70.6% +1.55 7–4 (64%) 4–3 (57%) 97.0 +0.57 2018 1873 141.1 +0.84 +1.05 1.013 50.4% +44 -80 +237 54.0% +0.33 7–4 (64%) 3–3 (50%) 98.9 +0.67
39 2021 1994 145.6 +4.15 +2.90 1.229 53.9% +132 +333 — 68.6% +1.54 3–0 (100%) 2–2 (50%) 101.9 -0.19 2019 1820 145.6 +0.36 +1.07 0.992 50.0% +35 -40 +249 51.9% +0.05 9–4 (69%) 6–3 (67%) 103.1 -1.42
40 2022 1926 119.5 +0.06 -0.90 0.934 48.7% +144 — — 47.1% -0.35 1–2 (33%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.04 2020 1714 126.0 +0.01 -0.68 0.905 48.2% +47 — — 27.3% -1.14 0–4 (0%) 0–3 (0%) 90.8 -1.11
41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1647 111.7 -2.68 -2.16 0.811 45.9% +79 -9 — 29.6% -1.59 1–2 (33%) 0–2 — -0.85
42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1602 107.5 -2.82 -1.21 0.703 43.0% +66 — — 11.1% -2.78 0–1 0–1 — 0.00
43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1593 114.1 -1.10 -0.46 0.880 47.2% +55 — +447 40.0% -1.00 1–4 (20%) 3–1 (75%) 95.5 -0.01
Career — 2399 174.5 +8.45 +4.77 1.403 56.6% +43 -85 +34 79.6% +2.21 168–65 (72%) 113–57 (66%) 110.8 -2.44 — 2369 167.3 +3.54 +2.76 1.146 52.9% +33 -76 +111 68.9% +1.40 185–126 (59%) 137–101 (58%) 99.2 -2.45

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.