H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Serena Williams vs Vera Dushevina H2H: 3-0

Serena Williams holds a 3–0 lead over Vera Dushevina in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Serena Williams leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Serena Williams won the 2010 Madrid third round 6-7(2) 7-6(5) 7-6(5).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Serena Williams
USA Age 44 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main draw meetings
Vera Dushevina
RUS Age 39 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 13, 2010* Madrid WTA 1000 R32 Clay Serena Williams #1 6-7(2) 7-6(5) 7-6(5) Vera Dushevina #43 Match data
Jan 16, 2010* Sydney WTA 500 QF Hard Serena Williams #1 6-2 6-2 Vera Dushevina #43 Match data
Mar 25, 2005* Miami WTA 1000 R64 Hard Serena Williams #4 6-3 6-0 Vera Dushevina #42 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Serena Williams #320 #1 13,615 2,405 825 170 82.9% 23 23 5 17 3 71
Vera Dushevina #741 #31 1,490 1,786 143 172 45.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Serena Williams Vera Dushevina
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1997 3–2 60.0% #101 1,582 0 0 2002 0–1 0.0% #473 1,485 0 0
16 1998 26–11 70.3% #20 1,895 0 0 2003 5–4 55.6% #113 1,552 0 0
17 1999 37–7 84.1% #4 2,170 1 4 2004 12–16 42.9% #63 1,590 0 0
18 2000 37–8 82.2% #6 2,174 1 7 2005 19–19 50.0% #40 1,657 0 0
19 2001 40–7 85.1% #6 2,259 1 10 2006 12–22 35.3% #97 1,609 0 0
20 2002 57–5 91.9% #1 2,348 4 18 2007 19–15 55.9% #40 1,747 0 0
21 2003 36–3 92.3% #3 2,369 6 22 2008 12–17 41.4% #89 1,681 0 0
22 2004 39–11 78.0% #7 2,192 6 24 2009 24–18 57.1% #43 1,762 0 1
23 2005 21–9 70.0% #11 2,028 7 25 2010 19–19 50.0% #54 1,757 0 1
24 2006 12–4 75.0% #95 2,016 7 25 2011 12–17 41.4% #86 1,724 0 1
25 2007 34–10 77.3% #7 2,058 8 27 2012 5–15 25.0% #146 1,534 0 1
26 2008 41–8 83.7% #2 2,109 9 31 2013 4–8 33.3% #124 1,554 0 1
27 2009 50–13 79.4% #1 2,106 11 34 2014 0–1 0.0% #463 1,541 0 1
28 2010 25–4 86.2% #4 2,149 13 36 — — — — — — —
29 2011 22–4 84.6% #12 2,155 13 38 — — — — — — —
30 2012 48–6 88.9% #3 2,239 15 44 — — — — — — —
31 2013 77–5 93.9% #1 2,345 17 55 — — — — — — —
32 2014 52–10 83.9% #1 2,209 18 62 — — — — — — —
33 2015 50–6 89.3% #1 2,197 21 67 — — — — — — —
34 2016 36–5 87.8% #2 2,177 22 69 — — — — — — —
35 2017 8–1 88.9% #22 2,172 23 70 — — — — — — —
36 2018 18–7 72.0% #16 2,078 23 70 — — — — — — —
37 2019 25–8 75.8% #10 2,052 23 70 — — — — — — —
38 2020 16–5 76.2% #11 1,991 23 71 — — — — — — —
39 2021 12–6 66.7% #41 1,950 23 71 — — — — — — —
40 2022 3–4 42.9% #320 1,891 23 71 — — — — — — —
44 2026 0–1 0.0% #320 — 23 71 — — — — — — —