H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Serena Williams vs Virginia Ruano Pascual H2H: 1-1

Serena Williams and Virginia Ruano Pascual are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Serena Williams leads 1–0 on clay, while Virginia Ruano Pascual leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Serena Williams won the 2009 Roland Garros second round 6-2 6-0.

USA Age 44 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 1
2 main draw meetings
ESP Age 52 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 28, 2009* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Serena Williams #2 6-2 6-0 Virginia Ruano Pascual #133 Match data
Jun 28, 1998* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Virginia Ruano Pascual #47 7-5 4-1 (ret.) Serena Williams #20 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Serena Williams #320 #1 13,615 2,405 825 170 82.9% 23 23 5 17 3 71
Virginia Ruano Pascual #998 #28 893 1,819 199 235 45.9% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Serena Williams Virginia Ruano Pascual
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1997 3–2 60.0% #101 1,582 0 0
16 1998 26–11 70.3% #20 1,895 0 0 1990 0–1 0.0% #307 1,481 0 0
17 1999 37–7 84.1% #4 2,170 1 4 1991 2–2 50.0% #194 1,500 0 0
18 2000 37–8 82.2% #6 2,174 1 7 1992 1–4 20.0% #137 1,494 0 0
19 2001 40–7 85.1% #6 2,259 1 10 1993 6–10 37.5% #126 1,515 0 0
20 2002 57–5 91.9% #1 2,348 4 18 1994 0–4 0.0% #171 1,477 0 0
21 2003 36–3 92.3% #3 2,369 6 22 1995 11–13 45.8% #61 1,562 0 0
22 2004 39–11 78.0% #7 2,192 6 24 1996 8–15 34.8% #87 1,570 0 0
23 2005 21–9 70.0% #11 2,028 7 25 1997 18–10 64.3% #52 1,730 0 1
24 2006 12–4 75.0% #95 2,016 7 25 1998 22–16 57.9% #32 1,774 0 2
25 2007 34–10 77.3% #7 2,058 8 27 1999 12–16 42.9% #85 1,659 0 2
26 2008 41–8 83.7% #2 2,109 9 31 2000 8–8 50.0% #89 1,644 0 2
27 2009 50–13 79.4% #1 2,106 11 34 2001 13–18 41.9% #56 1,607 0 2
28 2010 25–4 86.2% #4 2,149 13 36 2002 19–21 47.5% #65 1,633 0 2
29 2011 22–4 84.6% #12 2,155 13 38 2003 19–17 52.8% #55 1,694 0 3
30 2012 48–6 88.9% #3 2,239 15 44 2004 12–16 42.9% #64 1,646 0 3
31 2013 77–5 93.9% #1 2,345 17 55 2005 10–18 35.7% #107 1,560 0 3
32 2014 52–10 83.9% #1 2,209 18 62 2006 15–13 53.6% #66 1,659 0 3
33 2015 50–6 89.3% #1 2,197 21 67 2007 11–14 44.0% #81 1,630 0 3
34 2016 36–5 87.8% #2 2,177 22 69 2008 9–12 42.9% #107 1,622 0 3
35 2017 8–1 88.9% #22 2,172 23 70 2009 3–5 37.5% #200 1,621 0 3
36 2018 18–7 72.0% #16 2,078 23 70 2010 0–2 0.0% #998 1,591 0 3
37 2019 25–8 75.8% #10 2,052 23 70
38 2020 16–5 76.2% #11 1,991 23 71
39 2021 12–6 66.7% #41 1,950 23 71
40 2022 3–4 42.9% #320 1,891 23 71
44 2026 0–1 0.0% #320 23 71