H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Serena Williams vs Yung Jan Chan H2H: 1-1
Serena Williams and Yung Jan Chan are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Yung Jan Chan leads 1–0 on clay, while Serena Williams leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Yung Jan Chan won the 2007 Charleston third round 5-3 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 12, 2007* | Charleston | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Yung Jan Chan | 5-3 (ret.) | Serena Williams | Match data |
| Aug 31, 2005* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Serena Williams | 6-1 6-3 | Yung Jan Chan | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Serena Williams | #320 | #1 | 13,615 | 2,405 | 825 | 170 | 82.9% | 23 | 23 | 5 | 17 | 3 | 71 |
| Yung Jan Chan | — | — | — | 1,640 | 49 | 83 | 37.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Serena Williams | Yung Jan Chan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1997 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #101 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 26–11 | 70.3% | #20 | 1,895 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 37–7 | 84.1% | #4 | 2,170 | 1 | 4 | 2007 | 10–16 | 38.5% | — | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 37–8 | 82.2% | #6 | 2,174 | 1 | 7 | 2008 | 15–19 | 44.1% | — | 1,610 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 40–7 | 85.1% | #6 | 2,259 | 1 | 10 | 2009 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 57–5 | 91.9% | #1 | 2,348 | 4 | 18 | 2010 | 5–13 | 27.8% | — | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 36–3 | 92.3% | #3 | 2,369 | 6 | 22 | 2011 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 39–11 | 78.0% | #7 | 2,192 | 6 | 24 | 2012 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 21–9 | 70.0% | #11 | 2,028 | 7 | 25 | 2013 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,582 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 12–4 | 75.0% | #95 | 2,016 | 7 | 25 | 2014 | 1–6 | 14.3% | — | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 34–10 | 77.3% | #7 | 2,058 | 8 | 27 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 41–8 | 83.7% | #2 | 2,109 | 9 | 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 50–13 | 79.4% | #1 | 2,106 | 11 | 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 25–4 | 86.2% | #4 | 2,149 | 13 | 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 22–4 | 84.6% | #12 | 2,155 | 13 | 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 48–6 | 88.9% | #3 | 2,239 | 15 | 44 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 77–5 | 93.9% | #1 | 2,345 | 17 | 55 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 52–10 | 83.9% | #1 | 2,209 | 18 | 62 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 50–6 | 89.3% | #1 | 2,197 | 21 | 67 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 36–5 | 87.8% | #2 | 2,177 | 22 | 69 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 8–1 | 88.9% | #22 | 2,172 | 23 | 70 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 18–7 | 72.0% | #16 | 2,078 | 23 | 70 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 25–8 | 75.8% | #10 | 2,052 | 23 | 70 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 16–5 | 76.2% | #11 | 1,991 | 23 | 71 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 12–6 | 66.7% | #41 | 1,950 | 23 | 71 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #320 | 1,891 | 23 | 71 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #320 | — | 23 | 71 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |