H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Shahar Peer vs Aiko Nakamura H2H: 2-0

Shahar Peer holds a 2–0 lead over Aiko Nakamura in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Shahar Peer leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Shahar Peer won the 2007 Eastbourne Open round of 16 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Shahar Peer
ISR Age 39 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Aiko Nakamura
JPN Age 42 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Shahar Peer #16 6-3 6-2 Aiko Nakamura #85 Match data Jun 22, 2007* R16 Eastbourne Open Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Grass
Shahar Peer #46 2-6 6-3 6-0 Aiko Nakamura #62 Match data Jan 14, 2006* QF Canberra Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Shahar Peer #1,185 #11 3,410 1,969 269 206 56.6% 0 0 0 0 5 5
Aiko Nakamura #730 #47 569 1,644 50 76 39.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Shahar Peer Aiko Nakamura
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2004 3–3 50.0% #176 1,510 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2005 22–20 52.4% #45 1,635 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2006 38–20 65.5% #20 1,828 0 3 — — — — — — —
20 2007 39–21 65.0% #17 1,833 0 3 2004 1–2 33.3% #135 1,505 0 0
21 2008 25–21 54.3% #38 1,710 0 3 2005 11–13 45.8% #71 1,568 0 0
22 2009 36–21 63.2% #30 1,788 0 5 2006 19–18 51.4% #57 1,620 0 0
23 2010 47–21 69.1% #13 1,888 0 5 2007 13–21 38.2% #66 1,548 0 0
24 2011 23–21 52.3% #37 1,708 0 5 2008 5–18 21.7% #146 1,489 0 0
25 2012 15–23 39.5% #74 1,585 0 5 2009 0–2 0.0% #224 1,461 0 0
26 2013 10–14 41.7% #77 1,559 0 5 2010 1–1 50.0% #677 1,475 0 0
27 2014 10–18 35.7% #117 1,539 0 5 2011 0–1 0.0% #231 1,468 0 0
28 2015 1–3 25.0% #177 1,527 0 5 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Shahar Peer Aiko Nakamura
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2004 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2005 16 13 29 55.2% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2006 22 14 36 61.1% 14 3 17 82.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2007 29 14 43 67.4% 6 4 10 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2004 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2008 20 15 35 57.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2005 9 10 19 47.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
22 2009 28 14 42 66.7% 7 6 13 53.8% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2006 17 12 29 58.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2010 32 14 46 69.6% 12 4 16 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 2007 10 15 25 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2011 20 14 34 58.8% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2008 2 14 16 12.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
25 2012 8 11 19 42.1% 6 8 14 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 2013 6 9 15 40.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — 2010 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2014 7 13 20 35.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2011 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2015 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 191 136 327 58.4% 62 48 110 56.4% 13 18 31 41.9% 3 4 7 42.9% — 40 56 96 41.7% 4 9 13 30.8% 5 8 13 38.5% 1 3 4 25.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 370/469 of Shahar Peer's and 66/122 of Aiko Nakamura's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Shahar Peer Aiko Nakamura
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2005 5/42 1.4 4.4 55.4% 58.1% 41.3% 58.7% 48.3% 50.7% 44.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2006 30/58 1.1 3.6 64.3% 60.8% 44.2% 51.0% 52.2% 54.9% 47.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2007 58/60 1.3 2.8 66.3% 63.0% 48.5% 53.0% 52.1% 58.4% 47.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2008 37/46 1.1 2.6 68.0% 61.7% 44.5% 47.6% 45.8% 56.2% 46.1% 2005 6/24 1.3 6.0 58.0% 59.3% 34.3% 50.4% 43.0% 48.8% 39.4%
22 2009 48/57 1.5 2.1 65.2% 61.3% 47.9% 52.4% 48.8% 56.5% 47.1% 2006 14/37 1.1 3.3 61.3% 60.8% 45.2% 44.1% 46.6% 54.5% 41.9%
23 2010 63/68 1.5 3.1 64.4% 64.7% 46.9% 55.5% 49.4% 58.4% 45.9% 2007 26/34 1.4 3.3 60.5% 58.9% 40.4% 46.5% 44.7% 51.7% 43.0%
24 2011 41/44 1.2 3.0 63.5% 60.5% 43.0% 50.2% 46.0% 54.1% 42.9% 2008 16/23 0.9 3.3 63.7% 55.8% 37.9% 44.0% 43.5% 49.4% 36.9%
25 2012 35/38 1.2 3.5 63.2% 59.5% 42.5% 41.1% 48.8% 53.4% 44.7% 2009 2/2 2.0 4.5 64.9% 51.5% 22.8% 39.7% 91.7% 41.0% 39.8%
26 2013 23/24 0.6 3.2 64.9% 57.9% 42.9% 54.5% 48.3% 52.4% 45.5% 2010 2/2 0.5 6.0 66.4% 47.6% 29.2% 33.8% 85.0% 41.3% 40.0%
27 2014 26/28 0.8 4.7 62.5% 59.2% 39.5% 44.3% 48.8% 51.9% 45.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2015 4/4 0.8 3.3 63.6% 52.0% 42.6% 26.5% 60.4% 48.4% 37.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 370/475 1.2 3.1 64.7% 61.4% 45.1% 50.5% 49.2% 55.7% 45.8% — 66/126 1.2 3.6 61.5% 58.0% 39.4% 45.1% 47.3% 50.8% 40.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Shahar Peer Aiko Nakamura
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2004 1510 102.5 — — — — +18 — — 53.8% -0.08 0–1 — — +0.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2005 1636 124.9 -1.60 +0.29 0.910 48.0% -10 -58 -78 51.0% -0.03 10–8 (56%) 3–4 (43%) 102.4 -0.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2006 1829 146.6 -0.62 +1.81 1.042 50.8% -41 -7 -266 61.9% +1.04 11–7 (61%) 9–9 (50%) 104.4 +0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2007 1833 153.0 +2.29 +3.68 1.138 52.8% +7 +25 -154 63.6% +0.84 6–8 (43%) 9–4 (69%) 101.8 +0.52 2004 1505 108.0 — — — — +23 — — 33.3% -1.17 — 1–0 — -0.35
21 2008 1710 132.5 +0.71 +1.58 1.054 51.1% +42 +32 0 52.0% +0.17 7–5 (58%) 4–5 (44%) 98.3 0.00 2005 1568 117.9 -3.08 -1.83 0.770 44.8% +2 — — 45.8% -0.30 6–5 (55%) 1–5 (17%) 99.1 +0.24
22 2009 1789 138.4 +1.20 +2.73 1.084 52.0% +30 -85 — 60.5% +0.76 9–4 (69%) 8–2 (80%) 108.3 -0.03 2006 1621 117.5 -1.07 -2.00 0.920 47.9% +24 -78 — 50.6% -0.13 5–6 (45%) 5–1 (83%) 101.1 +1.14
23 2010 1888 152.7 +2.81 +2.91 1.104 52.2% -10 -19 -200 62.7% +0.97 14–4 (78%) 5–6 (45%) 106.9 -0.29 2007 1548 108.1 -3.29 -1.84 0.891 47.2% -11 -43 +34 37.3% -0.84 5–4 (56%) 1–6 (14%) 97.1 +0.20
24 2011 1708 130.0 -0.93 -0.58 0.936 48.7% +54 +67 — 49.5% -0.07 9–4 (69%) 4–4 (50%) 101.2 +1.40 2008 1489 112.6 -3.75 -4.17 0.729 43.7% -29 +17 +95 22.0% -2.16 3–3 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 102.7 -1.31
25 2012 1586 125.7 -1.37 +0.83 0.959 49.0% +71 +119 +14 41.3% -0.51 1–9 (10%) 2–5 (29%) 86.0 -0.53 2009 1461 93.4 -2.15 -0.86 0.675 40.3% — — — 20.0% -2.60 0–1 — — +0.24
26 2013 1559 108.2 -2.36 -0.25 0.955 49.0% +34 +89 — 41.8% -0.56 4–3 (57%) 3–0 (100%) — +1.54 2010 1475 101.1 -2.97 -1.43 0.680 40.8% — — — 40.0% -2.00 1–0 1–0 — -0.01
27 2014 1539 108.9 -3.44 +0.83 0.938 48.5% +5 +83 +40 40.3% -0.91 4–7 (36%) 4–0 (100%) 99.7 -0.24 2011 1469 95.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.50 — — — -0.13
28 2015 1527 104.5 -1.91 -2.82 0.718 42.6% — — — 22.2% -2.22 1–0 0–2 — -0.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2016 1478 88.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1969 140.8 +0.35 +1.76 1.032 50.7% +14 +16 -88 54.5% +0.32 76–60 (56%) 51–41 (55%) 103.9 +0.51 — 1644 115.0 -2.87 -2.40 0.829 45.9% +1 -43 +65 39.6% -0.84 20–19 (51%) 11–13 (46%) 101.2 +0.02

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.