H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Shahar Peer vs Akgul Amanmuradova H2H: 5-0

Shahar Peer holds a 5–0 lead over Akgul Amanmuradova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Shahar Peer leads 4–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Shahar Peer won the 2012 's Hertogenbosch third round 6-2 6-4.

ISR Age 39 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
5 0
5 main draw meetings
UZB Age 42 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 21, 2012* 's Hertogenbosch WTA 250 R32 Grass Shahar Peer #47 6-2 6-4 Akgul Amanmuradova #96 Match data
Sep 27, 2009* Tashkent WTA 250 F Hard Shahar Peer #46 6-3 6-4 Akgul Amanmuradova #113 Match data
Sep 18, 2009* Guangzhou WTA 250 R16 Hard Shahar Peer #57 6-3 6-3 Akgul Amanmuradova #122 Match data
Mar 12, 2008* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R64 Hard Shahar Peer #18 6-1 6-4 Akgul Amanmuradova #69 Match data
Feb 4, 2005* Pattaya WTA 250 R16 Hard Shahar Peer #132 6-4 6-2 Akgul Amanmuradova #381 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Shahar Peer #1,185 #11 3,410 1,966 268 204 56.8% 0 0 0 1 4 5
Akgul Amanmuradova #1,097 #50 1,031 1,631 61 101 37.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Shahar Peer Akgul Amanmuradova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2004 3–3 50.0% #176 1,509 0 0 2001 0–1 0.0% 1,481 0 0
18 2005 22–20 52.4% #45 1,636 0 0 2002 0–1 0.0% #607 1,471 0 0
19 2006 38–20 65.5% #20 1,826 0 3 2003 0–1 0.0% #307 1,464 0 0
20 2007 39–21 65.0% #17 1,830 0 3 2004 0–1 0.0% #380 1,450 0 0
21 2008 24–20 54.5% #38 1,707 0 3 2005 5–3 62.5% #197 1,507 0 0
22 2009 36–21 63.2% #30 1,787 0 5 2006 1–3 25.0% #204 1,491 0 0
23 2010 47–21 69.1% #13 1,885 0 5 2007 8–8 50.0% #96 1,529 0 0
24 2011 23–21 52.3% #37 1,706 0 5 2008 15–21 41.7% #82 1,530 0 0
25 2012 15–22 40.5% #74 1,584 0 5 2009 8–11 42.1% #85 1,542 0 0
26 2013 10–14 41.7% #77 1,558 0 5 2010 11–15 42.3% #70 1,580 0 0
27 2014 10–18 35.7% #117 1,539 0 5 2011 6–17 26.1% #114 1,494 0 0
28 2015 1–3 25.0% #177 1,526 0 5 2012 3–12 20.0% #198 1,457 0 0
29 2013 2–3 40.0% #227 1,484 0 0
30 2014 2–2 50.0% #211 1,483 0 0
33 2017 0–1 0.0% #375 1,490 0 0
35 2019 0–1 0.0% #459 1,465 0 0