H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Shahar Peer vs Aleksandra Wozniak H2H: 1-2
Aleksandra Wozniak holds a 2–1 lead over Shahar Peer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Aleksandra Wozniak leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Shahar Peer won the 2012 Strasbourg third round 7-5 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ISR
Age 39
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 38
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2012* | Strasbourg | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Shahar Peer | 7-5 6-0 | Aleksandra Wozniak | Match data |
| May 3, 2012* | Budapest | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Aleksandra Wozniak | 6-4 6-3 | Shahar Peer | Match data |
| Aug 8, 2011 | Toronto | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Aleksandra Wozniak | 6-1 6-0 | Shahar Peer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shahar Peer | #1,185 | #11 | 3,410 | 1,966 | 268 | 204 | 56.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Aleksandra Wozniak | #1,042 | #21 | 2,114 | 1,791 | 102 | 127 | 44.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Shahar Peer | Aleksandra Wozniak | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #492 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2004 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #176 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #168 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2005 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #45 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #93 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2006 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #20 | 1,826 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2007 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #17 | 1,830 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #34 | 1,676 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2008 | 24–20 | 54.5% | #38 | 1,707 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #34 | 1,765 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2009 | 36–21 | 63.2% | #30 | 1,787 | 0 | 5 | 2010 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #125 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2010 | 47–21 | 69.1% | #13 | 1,885 | 0 | 5 | 2011 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #107 | 1,582 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2011 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #37 | 1,706 | 0 | 5 | 2012 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #43 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2012 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #74 | 1,584 | 0 | 5 | 2013 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #288 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2013 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #77 | 1,558 | 0 | 5 | 2014 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #130 | 1,607 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2014 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #117 | 1,539 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2015 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #177 | 1,526 | 0 | 5 | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #301 | 1,541 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #300 | 1,514 | 0 | 1 |