H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Shahar Peer vs Maria Vento-Kabchi H2H: 0-1

Maria Vento-Kabchi holds a 1–0 lead over Shahar Peer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Maria Vento-Kabchi leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Maria Vento-Kabchi won the 2005 US Open third round 7-5 4-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Shahar Peer
ISR Age 39 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Maria Vento-Kabchi
VEN Age 52 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Maria Vento-Kabchi #72 7-5 4-6 6-3 Shahar Peer #60 Match data Sep 3, 2005* R32 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Shahar Peer #1,185 #11 3,410 1,969 269 206 56.6% 0 0 0 0 5 5
Maria Vento-Kabchi #996 #26 1,053 1,718 97 158 38.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Shahar Peer Maria Vento-Kabchi
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2004 3–3 50.0% #176 1,510 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2005 22–20 52.4% #45 1,635 0 0 1992 0–1 0.0% #551 1,496 0 0
19 2006 38–20 65.5% #20 1,828 0 3 — — — — — — —
20 2007 39–21 65.0% #17 1,833 0 3 1994 3–6 33.3% #166 1,520 0 0
21 2008 25–21 54.3% #38 1,710 0 3 1995 5–8 38.5% #86 1,551 0 0
22 2009 36–21 63.2% #30 1,788 0 5 1996 1–6 14.3% #139 1,504 0 0
23 2010 47–21 69.1% #13 1,888 0 5 1997 11–7 61.1% #51 1,630 0 0
24 2011 23–21 52.3% #37 1,708 0 5 1998 11–18 37.9% #43 1,652 0 0
25 2012 15–23 39.5% #74 1,585 0 5 1999 3–16 15.8% #110 1,534 0 0
26 2013 10–14 41.7% #77 1,559 0 5 2000 8–15 34.8% #104 1,546 0 0
27 2014 10–18 35.7% #117 1,539 0 5 2001 4–7 36.4% #155 1,540 0 0
28 2015 1–3 25.0% #177 1,527 0 5 2002 2–4 33.3% #172 1,517 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 2003 15–8 65.2% #44 1,717 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2004 19–27 41.3% #48 1,637 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2005 13–23 36.1% #62 1,574 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 2006 2–12 14.3% #324 1,462 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Shahar Peer Maria Vento-Kabchi
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2004 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2005 16 13 29 55.2% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1992 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2006 22 14 36 61.1% 14 3 17 82.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2007 29 14 43 67.4% 6 4 10 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1994 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 1 3 4 25.0%
21 2008 20 15 35 57.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 1995 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
22 2009 28 14 42 66.7% 7 6 13 53.8% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1996 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
23 2010 32 14 46 69.6% 12 4 16 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 1997 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
24 2011 20 14 34 58.8% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1998 5 7 12 41.7% 2 6 8 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
25 2012 8 11 19 42.1% 6 8 14 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1999 1 7 8 12.5% 0 6 6 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 2013 6 9 15 40.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — 2000 7 6 13 53.8% 0 6 6 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
27 2014 7 13 20 35.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2001 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
28 2015 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2002 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 8 5 13 61.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 13 18 31 41.9% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 6 14 20 30.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1 8 9 11.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
Career — 191 136 327 58.4% 62 48 110 56.4% 13 18 31 41.9% 3 4 7 42.9% — 57 87 144 39.6% 9 33 42 21.4% 16 20 36 44.4% 15 18 33 45.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Shahar Peer Maria Vento-Kabchi
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2004 1510 102.5 — — — — +18 — — 53.8% -0.08 0–1 — — +0.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2005 1636 124.9 -1.60 +0.29 0.910 48.0% -10 -58 -78 51.0% -0.03 10–8 (56%) 3–4 (43%) 102.4 -0.40 1992 1497 102.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.16
19 2006 1829 146.6 -0.62 +1.81 1.042 50.8% -41 -7 -266 61.9% +1.04 11–7 (61%) 9–9 (50%) 104.4 +0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2007 1833 153.0 +2.29 +3.68 1.138 52.8% +7 +25 -154 63.6% +0.84 6–8 (43%) 9–4 (69%) 101.8 +0.52 1994 1520 126.6 — — — — +36 — — 39.1% -0.17 2–3 (40%) 0–3 (0%) — -0.12
21 2008 1710 132.5 +0.71 +1.58 1.054 51.1% +42 +32 0 52.0% +0.17 7–5 (58%) 4–5 (44%) 98.3 0.00 1995 1551 125.8 — — — — +28 — — 47.1% -0.09 2–6 (25%) 1–2 (33%) 96.2 -0.02
22 2009 1789 138.4 +1.20 +2.73 1.084 52.0% +30 -85 — 60.5% +0.76 9–4 (69%) 8–2 (80%) 108.3 -0.03 1996 1504 101.6 — — — — +49 — — 20.0% -2.40 0–1 1–0 — -0.04
23 2010 1888 152.7 +2.81 +2.91 1.104 52.2% -10 -19 -200 62.7% +0.97 14–4 (78%) 5–6 (45%) 106.9 -0.29 1997 1630 124.6 — — — — +10 — +13 55.6% +0.22 2–0 1–0 — +1.99
24 2011 1708 130.0 -0.93 -0.58 0.936 48.7% +54 +67 — 49.5% -0.07 9–4 (69%) 4–4 (50%) 101.2 +1.40 1998 1652 129.3 — — — — -18 -132 +32 41.8% -0.54 3–6 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 98.4 -0.76
25 2012 1586 125.7 -1.37 +0.83 0.959 49.0% +71 +119 +14 41.3% -0.51 1–9 (10%) 2–5 (29%) 86.0 -0.53 1999 1535 107.0 — — — — +27 -89 — 22.7% -2.05 2–4 (33%) 1–1 — -0.38
26 2013 1559 108.2 -2.36 -0.25 0.955 49.0% +34 +89 — 41.8% -0.56 4–3 (57%) 3–0 (100%) — +1.54 2000 1547 118.9 — — — — +90 -168 +71 34.0% -1.09 1–2 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 98.1 -0.49
27 2014 1539 108.9 -3.44 +0.83 0.938 48.5% +5 +83 +40 40.3% -0.91 4–7 (36%) 4–0 (100%) 99.7 -0.24 2001 1540 115.9 — — — — +107 — — 33.3% -1.33 2–0 2–2 (50%) — -0.46
28 2015 1527 104.5 -1.91 -2.82 0.718 42.6% — — — 22.2% -2.22 1–0 0–2 — -0.28 2002 1518 110.8 — — — — +115 — — 30.8% -0.92 1–0 1–0 — +0.10
29 2016 1478 88.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1717 136.1 -0.61 +1.41 0.957 49.2% +34 — -78 62.0% +0.86 3–3 (50%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.33
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1638 126.5 -2.36 +1.05 0.849 46.3% +7 -231 -55 42.9% -0.59 6–7 (46%) 4–5 (44%) 97.6 -0.18
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1575 117.2 -1.22 -0.89 0.872 47.0% -9 -131 +34 34.6% -1.30 7–4 (64%) 4–3 (57%) 106.1 +0.18
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1462 91.7 -2.62 -2.46 0.809 45.0% +1 -51 — 25.0% -1.94 0–4 (0%) — — +0.53
Career — 1969 140.8 +0.35 +1.76 1.032 50.7% +14 +16 -88 54.5% +0.32 76–60 (56%) 51–41 (55%) 103.9 +0.51 — 1718 127.6 -1.90 -0.81 0.852 46.4% +24 -143 +3 39.4% -0.79 31–40 (44%) 21–22 (49%) 99.6 +0.20

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.