H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Shahar Peer vs Marta Domachowska H2H: 3-0
Shahar Peer holds a 3–0 lead over Marta Domachowska in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Shahar Peer leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Shahar Peer won the 2005 US Open first round 7-5 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ISR
Age 39
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
POL
Age 40
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 2005* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Shahar Peer | 7-5 7-5 | Marta Domachowska | Match data |
| Mar 24, 2005* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Shahar Peer | 6-2 2-6 7-5 | Marta Domachowska | Match data |
| Feb 3, 2005* | Pattaya | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Shahar Peer | 6-3 6-2 | Marta Domachowska | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shahar Peer | #1,185 | #11 | 3,410 | 1,966 | 268 | 204 | 56.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Marta Domachowska | #943 | #37 | 1,002 | 1,676 | 67 | 98 | 40.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Shahar Peer | Marta Domachowska | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #350 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2004 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #176 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #252 | 1,439 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2005 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #45 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 12–7 | 63.2% | #73 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2006 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #20 | 1,826 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #59 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2007 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #17 | 1,830 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #91 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2008 | 24–20 | 54.5% | #38 | 1,707 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #143 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2009 | 36–21 | 63.2% | #30 | 1,787 | 0 | 5 | 2008 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #65 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2010 | 47–21 | 69.1% | #13 | 1,885 | 0 | 5 | 2009 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #137 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2011 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #37 | 1,706 | 0 | 5 | 2010 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #296 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2012 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #74 | 1,584 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2013 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #77 | 1,558 | 0 | 5 | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #228 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2014 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #117 | 1,539 | 0 | 5 | 2013 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #437 | 1,438 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2015 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #177 | 1,526 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |