H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Shahar Peer vs Patty Schnyder H2H: 2-2
Shahar Peer and Patty Schnyder are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts. Most recently, Shahar Peer won the 2010 Beijing third round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ISR
Age 39
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 47
Left-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 7, 2010* | Beijing | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Shahar Peer | 6-4 6-2 | Patty Schnyder | Match data |
| Jan 12, 2007* | Sydney | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Shahar Peer | 7-6(3) 6-2 | Patty Schnyder | Match data |
| Oct 6, 2006* | Stuttgart | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Patty Schnyder | 7-6(3) 2-6 6-4 | Shahar Peer | Match data |
| Jul 23, 2005* | Cincinnati | WTA 500 | QF | Hard | Patty Schnyder | 7-6(1) 6-2 | Shahar Peer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shahar Peer | #1,185 | #11 | 3,410 | 1,966 | 268 | 204 | 56.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Patty Schnyder | #278 | #7 | 3,050 | 1,987 | 492 | 346 | 58.7% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 11 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Shahar Peer | Patty Schnyder | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #143 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2004 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #176 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #64 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2005 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #45 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #26 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2006 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #20 | 1,826 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 51–19 | 72.9% | #11 | 1,910 | 0 | 5 |
| 20 | 2007 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #17 | 1,830 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #21 | 1,793 | 0 | 6 |
| 21 | 2008 | 24–20 | 54.5% | #38 | 1,707 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #25 | 1,751 | 0 | 6 |
| 22 | 2009 | 36–21 | 63.2% | #30 | 1,787 | 0 | 5 | 2001 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #37 | 1,734 | 0 | 7 |
| 23 | 2010 | 47–21 | 69.1% | #13 | 1,885 | 0 | 5 | 2002 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #15 | 1,848 | 0 | 8 |
| 24 | 2011 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #37 | 1,706 | 0 | 5 | 2003 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #23 | 1,818 | 0 | 8 |
| 25 | 2012 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #74 | 1,584 | 0 | 5 | 2004 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #14 | 1,793 | 0 | 8 |
| 26 | 2013 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #77 | 1,558 | 0 | 5 | 2005 | 58–25 | 69.9% | #7 | 1,928 | 0 | 10 |
| 27 | 2014 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #117 | 1,539 | 0 | 5 | 2006 | 47–25 | 65.3% | #9 | 1,898 | 0 | 10 |
| 28 | 2015 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #177 | 1,526 | 0 | 5 | 2007 | 45–26 | 63.4% | #16 | 1,879 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #14 | 1,827 | 0 | 11 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #42 | 1,755 | 0 | 11 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #44 | 1,799 | 0 | 11 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #55 | 1,667 | 0 | 11 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #324 | 1,631 | 0 | 11 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #148 | 1,627 | 0 | 11 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #278 | 1,597 | 0 | 11 |