H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Shahar Peer vs Tathiana Garbin H2H: 2-0

Shahar Peer holds a 2–0 lead over Tathiana Garbin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Shahar Peer leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Shahar Peer won the 2007 Canadian Open round of 32 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Shahar Peer
ISR Age 39 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Tathiana Garbin
ITA Age 49 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Shahar Peer #18 6-3 6-2 Tathiana Garbin #25 Match data Aug 16, 2007* R32 Canadian Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Shahar Peer #16 6-0 6-3 Tathiana Garbin #25 Match data Mar 24, 2007* QF Miami Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Shahar Peer #1,185 #11 3,410 1,969 269 206 56.6% 0 0 0 0 5 5
Tathiana Garbin #86 #22 1,255 1,726 168 209 44.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Shahar Peer Tathiana Garbin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2004 3–3 50.0% #176 1,510 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2005 22–20 52.4% #45 1,635 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2006 38–20 65.5% #20 1,828 0 3 — — — — — — —
20 2007 39–21 65.0% #17 1,833 0 3 — — — — — — —
21 2008 25–21 54.3% #38 1,710 0 3 1998 1–4 20.0% #121 1,476 0 0
22 2009 36–21 63.2% #30 1,788 0 5 1999 5–9 35.7% #126 1,467 0 0
23 2010 47–21 69.1% #13 1,888 0 5 2000 23–20 53.5% #42 1,619 0 1
24 2011 23–21 52.3% #37 1,708 0 5 2001 13–19 40.6% #91 1,575 0 1
25 2012 15–23 39.5% #74 1,585 0 5 2002 18–17 51.4% #71 1,600 0 1
26 2013 10–14 41.7% #77 1,559 0 5 2003 12–17 41.4% #82 1,556 0 1
27 2014 10–18 35.7% #117 1,539 0 5 2004 12–19 38.7% #58 1,547 0 1
28 2015 1–3 25.0% #177 1,527 0 5 2005 13–19 40.6% #85 1,559 0 1
29 — — — — — — — 2006 15–15 50.0% #38 1,627 0 1
30 — — — — — — — 2007 20–16 55.6% #36 1,658 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 2008 14–20 41.2% #55 1,564 0 1
32 — — — — — — — 2009 13–16 44.8% #59 1,607 0 1
33 — — — — — — — 2010 9–17 34.6% #87 1,579 0 1
34 — — — — — — — 2011 0–1 0.0% #86 1,573 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Shahar Peer Tathiana Garbin
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2004 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2005 16 13 29 55.2% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2006 22 14 36 61.1% 14 3 17 82.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2007 29 14 43 67.4% 6 4 10 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2008 20 15 35 57.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 1998 — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — —
22 2009 28 14 42 66.7% 7 6 13 53.8% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1999 2 3 5 40.0% 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — — — — —
23 2010 32 14 46 69.6% 12 4 16 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 2000 4 9 13 30.8% 19 9 28 67.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2011 20 14 34 58.8% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2001 6 7 13 46.2% 7 10 17 41.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2012 8 11 19 42.1% 6 8 14 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2002 7 8 15 46.7% 11 8 19 57.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 2013 6 9 15 40.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — 2003 7 9 16 43.8% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 2014 7 13 20 35.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2004 8 13 21 38.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 2015 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2005 6 12 18 33.3% 7 6 13 53.8% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 7 8 15 46.7% 7 5 12 58.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 7 6 13 53.8% 12 7 19 63.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 8 9 17 47.1% 5 8 13 38.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 5 8 13 38.5% 7 7 14 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 3 7 10 30.0% 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 191 136 327 58.4% 62 48 110 56.4% 13 18 31 41.9% 3 4 7 42.9% — 70 100 170 41.2% 92 90 182 50.5% 3 13 16 18.8% 3 6 9 33.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 370/469 of Shahar Peer's and 128/248 of Tathiana Garbin's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Shahar Peer Tathiana Garbin
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2005 5/42 1.4 4.4 55.4% 58.1% 41.3% 58.7% 48.3% 50.7% 44.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2006 30/58 1.1 3.6 64.3% 60.8% 44.2% 51.0% 52.2% 54.9% 47.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2007 58/60 1.3 2.8 66.3% 63.0% 48.5% 53.0% 52.1% 58.4% 47.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2008 37/46 1.1 2.6 68.0% 61.7% 44.5% 47.6% 45.8% 56.2% 46.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2009 48/57 1.5 2.1 65.2% 61.3% 47.9% 52.4% 48.8% 56.5% 47.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2010 63/68 1.5 3.1 64.4% 64.7% 46.9% 55.5% 49.4% 58.4% 45.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2011 41/44 1.2 3.0 63.5% 60.5% 43.0% 50.2% 46.0% 54.1% 42.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2012 35/38 1.2 3.5 63.2% 59.5% 42.5% 41.1% 48.8% 53.4% 44.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2013 23/24 0.6 3.2 64.9% 57.9% 42.9% 54.5% 48.3% 52.4% 45.5% 2003 5/29 3.4 4.4 53.6% 65.0% 41.0% 38.8% 27.4% 54.0% 42.0%
27 2014 26/28 0.8 4.7 62.5% 59.2% 39.5% 44.3% 48.8% 51.9% 45.1% 2004 6/31 2.5 4.3 55.7% 66.8% 48.1% 48.7% 54.3% 58.8% 47.4%
28 2015 4/4 0.8 3.3 63.6% 52.0% 42.6% 26.5% 60.4% 48.4% 37.1% 2005 4/32 2.5 4.5 61.4% 59.3% 46.1% 56.8% 43.1% 54.3% 41.9%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 13/30 2.4 1.8 59.3% 57.9% 42.6% 47.5% 50.7% 51.9% 42.5%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 25/36 1.7 2.2 63.8% 59.2% 45.7% 47.8% 43.4% 54.4% 44.5%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 29/34 1.8 3.2 60.8% 59.0% 43.8% 47.8% 44.7% 52.8% 42.5%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 23/29 1.8 2.4 62.1% 59.4% 43.7% 56.0% 51.1% 53.5% 45.1%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 22/26 2.2 2.0 62.9% 56.2% 42.1% 50.0% 38.2% 51.0% 39.3%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 1/1 3.0 0.0 54.3% 31.6% 18.8% 14.3% 0.0% 25.7% 23.5%
Career — 370/475 1.2 3.1 64.7% 61.4% 45.1% 50.5% 49.2% 55.7% 45.8% — 128/377 2.0 2.6 61.3% 58.9% 43.7% 49.3% 44.5% 53.0% 42.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Shahar Peer Tathiana Garbin
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2004 1510 102.5 — — — — +18 — — 53.8% -0.08 0–1 — — +0.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2005 1636 124.9 -1.60 +0.29 0.910 48.0% -10 -58 -78 51.0% -0.03 10–8 (56%) 3–4 (43%) 102.4 -0.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2006 1829 146.6 -0.62 +1.81 1.042 50.8% -41 -7 -266 61.9% +1.04 11–7 (61%) 9–9 (50%) 104.4 +0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2007 1833 153.0 +2.29 +3.68 1.138 52.8% +7 +25 -154 63.6% +0.84 6–8 (43%) 9–4 (69%) 101.8 +0.52 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2008 1710 132.5 +0.71 +1.58 1.054 51.1% +42 +32 0 52.0% +0.17 7–5 (58%) 4–5 (44%) 98.3 0.00 1998 1476 99.1 — — — — — +30 — 33.3% -1.50 0–2 1–0 — +0.11
22 2009 1789 138.4 +1.20 +2.73 1.084 52.0% +30 -85 — 60.5% +0.76 9–4 (69%) 8–2 (80%) 108.3 -0.03 1999 1468 104.0 — — — — +69 +4 — 40.0% -0.57 2–2 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 101.8 +1.10
23 2010 1888 152.7 +2.81 +2.91 1.104 52.2% -10 -19 -200 62.7% +0.97 14–4 (78%) 5–6 (45%) 106.9 -0.29 2000 1619 130.4 — — — — -93 +74 — 50.5% +0.20 9–4 (69%) 6–6 (50%) 106.4 -0.40
24 2011 1708 130.0 -0.93 -0.58 0.936 48.7% +54 +67 — 49.5% -0.07 9–4 (69%) 4–4 (50%) 101.2 +1.40 2001 1575 127.1 — — — — -22 +73 — 46.3% -0.06 2–5 (29%) 2–2 (50%) 97.7 +0.37
25 2012 1586 125.7 -1.37 +0.83 0.959 49.0% +71 +119 +14 41.3% -0.51 1–9 (10%) 2–5 (29%) 86.0 -0.53 2002 1600 121.8 — — — — -44 +115 — 51.3% -0.01 5–5 (50%) 2–3 (40%) 101.1 +0.83
26 2013 1559 108.2 -2.36 -0.25 0.955 49.0% +34 +89 — 41.8% -0.56 4–3 (57%) 3–0 (100%) — +1.54 2003 1557 111.2 -0.57 -0.84 0.912 47.5% -9 +64 — 45.5% -0.44 6–6 (50%) 5–3 (63%) 101.4 +0.92
27 2014 1539 108.9 -3.44 +0.83 0.938 48.5% +5 +83 +40 40.3% -0.91 4–7 (36%) 4–0 (100%) 99.7 -0.24 2004 1547 122.1 +1.14 +0.66 1.149 53.5% +2 +76 — 42.9% -0.27 2–10 (17%) 3–7 (30%) 88.3 -0.03
28 2015 1527 104.5 -1.91 -2.82 0.718 42.6% — — — 22.2% -2.22 1–0 0–2 — -0.28 2005 1559 119.9 -0.38 -1.30 0.916 48.0% -30 +111 — 43.5% -0.46 3–4 (43%) 5–5 (50%) 98.7 +0.08
29 2016 1478 88.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1628 120.2 -2.20 -1.76 0.884 47.4% -84 +99 — 51.4% -0.03 4–6 (40%) 4–2 (67%) 100.7 +0.63
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1659 123.9 -0.97 -0.08 0.977 49.1% -68 +117 -189 54.8% +0.26 5–2 (71%) 3–1 (75%) 105.3 +2.93
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1564 113.6 -2.43 -1.04 0.900 47.7% +44 +64 — 44.9% -0.54 5–7 (42%) 3–1 (75%) 98.8 -0.12
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1607 121.1 -1.22 +0.36 0.971 49.5% -29 +75 — 50.0% -0.10 3–5 (38%) 2–2 (50%) 98.0 -0.47
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1580 121.0 -2.83 -2.13 0.801 45.3% +22 +32 — 33.3% -1.42 6–2 (75%) 3–2 (60%) 106.1 -1.97
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1573 96.6 +1.82 +1.60 0.317 24.6% — — — 0.0% -6.00 — — — -0.20
Career — 1969 140.8 +0.35 +1.76 1.032 50.7% +14 +16 -88 54.5% +0.32 76–60 (56%) 51–41 (55%) 103.9 +0.51 — 1726 125.4 -1.64 -0.76 0.912 48.0% -23 +78 -189 46.5% -0.27 52–60 (46%) 41–35 (54%) 102.2 +1.01

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.