H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Shahar Peer vs Yoon Jeong Cho H2H: 0-1
Yoon Jeong Cho holds a 1–0 lead over Shahar Peer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Yoon Jeong Cho leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Yoon Jeong Cho won the 2006 Auckland third round 7-6(0) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ISR
Age 39
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
KOR
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 5, 2006* | Auckland | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Yoon Jeong Cho | 7-6(0) 6-4 | Shahar Peer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shahar Peer | #1,185 | #11 | 3,410 | 1,966 | 268 | 204 | 56.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Yoon Jeong Cho | #1,416 | #45 | 740 | 1,704 | 45 | 58 | 43.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Shahar Peer | Yoon Jeong Cho | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2004 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #176 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #252 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #45 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #207 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #20 | 1,826 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #221 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #17 | 1,830 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #173 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 24–20 | 54.5% | #38 | 1,707 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #115 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 36–21 | 63.2% | #30 | 1,787 | 0 | 5 | 2002 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #83 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 47–21 | 69.1% | #13 | 1,885 | 0 | 5 | 2003 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #83 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #37 | 1,706 | 0 | 5 | 2004 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #173 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #74 | 1,584 | 0 | 5 | 2005 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #75 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #77 | 1,558 | 0 | 5 | 2006 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #265 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #117 | 1,539 | 0 | 5 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1416 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #177 | 1,526 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |