H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Sharon Walsh Pete vs Pam Shriver H2H: 0-4

Pam Shriver holds a 4–0 lead over Sharon Walsh Pete in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Pam Shriver leads 3–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Pam Shriver won the 1984 Manhattan Beach third round 6-2 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sharon Walsh Pete
Age 74 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 4
4 main draw meetings
Pam Shriver
USA Age 64 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 4, 1984* Manhattan Beach WTA 250 R32 Hard Pam Shriver #3 6-2 6-1 Sharon Walsh Pete Match data
Aug 13, 1981* Richmond WTA 250 R32 Hard Pam Shriver 6-1 7-6 Sharon Walsh Pete Match data
Jul 24, 1980* Richmond WTA 250 R32 Carpet Pam Shriver 6-3 6-2 Sharon Walsh Pete Match data
Sep 1, 1978* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Pam Shriver 6-3 7-6 Sharon Walsh Pete Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Sharon Walsh Pete — — — 1,894 300 340 46.9% 0 0 0 1 7 8
Pam Shriver #234 #3 163 2,302 624 277 69.3% 0 0 0 4 20 24

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sharon Walsh Pete Pam Shriver
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1978 23–8 74.2% — 1,849 0 1
16 1968 1–2 33.3% — 1,484 0 0 1979 16–16 50.0% — 1,798 0 1
17 1969 4–6 40.0% — 1,524 0 0 1980 47–21 69.1% — 2,027 0 2
18 1970 32–16 66.7% — 1,833 0 2 1981 58–25 69.9% — 2,122 0 4
19 1971 10–10 50.0% — 1,707 0 2 1982 47–19 71.2% — 2,087 0 5
20 1972 32–27 54.2% — 1,729 0 3 1983 52–15 77.6% — 2,161 0 8
21 1973 37–33 52.9% — 1,653 0 4 1984 44–13 77.2% #4 2,060 0 10
22 1974 27–19 58.7% — 1,774 0 7 1985 54–13 80.6% #4 2,117 0 14
23 1975 9–25 26.5% — 1,661 0 7 1986 47–15 75.8% #5 2,194 0 16
24 1976 7–10 41.2% — 1,620 0 7 1987 60–13 82.2% #4 2,254 0 20
25 1977 17–21 44.7% — 1,722 0 7 1988 58–14 80.6% #5 2,188 0 24
26 1978 15–27 35.7% — 1,677 0 7 1989 24–14 63.2% #18 1,955 0 24
27 1979 14–22 38.9% — 1,620 0 7 1990 8–5 61.5% #66 1,911 0 24
28 1980 16–19 45.7% — 1,712 0 7 1991 21–18 53.8% #37 1,822 0 24
29 1981 25–17 59.5% — 1,841 0 8 1992 25–18 58.1% #30 1,858 0 24
30 1982 10–19 34.5% — 1,758 0 8 1993 14–13 51.9% #38 1,819 0 24
31 1983 15–13 53.6% — 1,810 0 8 1994 13–16 44.8% #63 1,699 0 24
32 1984 8–12 40.0% — 1,808 0 8 1995 7–11 38.9% #110 1,649 0 24
33 1985 8–17 32.0% — 1,627 0 8 1996 4–9 30.8% #189 1,611 0 24
34 1986 2–4 33.3% — 1,602 0 8 1997 2–1 66.7% #234 1,635 0 24
35 1987 11–15 42.3% — 1,598 0 8 — — — — — — —
36 1988 0–6 0.0% — 1,507 0 8 — — — — — — —