H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Shelley Solomon vs Pam Casale H2H: 1-0

Shelley Solomon holds a 1–0 lead over Pam Casale in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Shelley Solomon leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Shelley Solomon won the 1983 US Open round of 128 3-6 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Shelley Solomon
USA
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Pam Casale
USA Age 62 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Shelley Solomon 3-6 6-3 6-3 Pam Casale Match data Sep 1, 1983* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Shelley Solomon — — — 1,681 40 49 44.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pam Casale #671 #14 22 1,944 168 147 53.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Shelley Solomon Pam Casale
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1980 15–10 60.0% — 1,597 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1981 30–17 63.8% — 1,810 0 0
18 1981 7–4 63.6% — 1,564 0 0 1982 20–23 46.5% — 1,745 0 0
19 1982 14–10 58.3% — 1,634 0 0 1983 23–20 53.5% — 1,770 0 0
20 1983 13–17 43.3% — 1,612 0 0 1984 31–17 64.6% #15 1,914 0 0
21 1984 6–15 28.6% — 1,502 0 0 1985 24–20 54.5% #14 1,814 0 0
22 1985 0–3 0.0% — 1,486 0 0 1986 16–17 48.5% #41 1,787 0 0
23 — — — — — — — 1987 5–11 31.2% #111 1,673 0 0
24 — — — — — — — 1988 4–10 28.6% #169 1,552 0 0
25 — — — — — — — 1989 0–1 0.0% #225 1,547 0 0
26 — — — — — — — 1990 0–1 0.0% #554 1,525 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Shelley Solomon Pam Casale
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 8 7 15 53.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 17 6 23 73.9% 7 5 12 58.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 3 5 40.0%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 2 4 6 33.3% 10 7 17 58.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 10 16 37.5%
19 1982 11 6 17 64.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1983 5 5 10 50.0% 13 8 21 61.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
20 1983 5 6 11 45.5% 4 6 10 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1984 8 3 11 72.7% 8 5 13 61.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 11 6 17 64.7%
21 1984 0 6 6 0.0% 6 8 14 42.9% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1985 17 7 24 70.8% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5%
22 1985 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1986 3 6 9 33.3% 11 5 16 68.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 3 5 8 37.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 3 6 9 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 16 19 35 45.7% 11 17 28 39.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — 66 49 115 57.4% 55 41 96 57.3% 15 19 34 44.1% 25 35 60 41.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Shelley Solomon Pam Casale
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1598 118.7 — — — — +29 — — 57.4% +0.72 3–3 (50%) 1–1 — +2.02
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1811 140.3 — — — — -1 -153 -196 64.1% +1.03 3–6 (33%) 6–0 (100%) 101.9 +1.97
18 1981 1565 116.5 — — — — — — — 68.2% +1.36 1–1 0–2 — +0.09 1982 1745 140.3 — — — — -54 -4 -106 50.5% +0.01 1–8 (11%) 9–5 (64%) 95.5 -3.37
19 1982 1634 112.8 — — — — +21 — — 56.1% +0.35 5–4 (56%) 1–2 (33%) — +1.73 1983 1770 144.1 — — — — -55 +93 -103 52.1% +0.47 5–3 (63%) 3–3 (50%) 102.6 -1.57
20 1983 1612 110.4 — — — — +9 -19 — 44.3% -0.46 5–5 (50%) 0–4 (0%) 97.6 +1.59 1984 1914 155.3 — — — — +6 -60 -210 64.8% +1.01 3–6 (33%) 7–3 (70%) 100.3 -2.46
21 1984 1503 98.6 — — — — -27 +85 — 31.1% -1.51 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +1.69 1985 1814 137.6 — — — — +80 -54 -188 53.1% +0.34 6–4 (60%) 3–3 (50%) 98.8 -1.08
22 1985 1486 104.8 — — — — — — — 25.0% -1.87 0–2 — — -0.33 1986 1788 137.1 — — — — -56 +52 — 46.8% -0.18 7–4 (64%) 6–3 (67%) 103.7 -3.63
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1673 114.3 — — — — -20 — -77 41.7% -0.56 3–5 (38%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.50
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1552 100.5 — — — — +25 +207 — 36.4% -0.79 1–4 (20%) 1–2 (33%) 92.4 +1.01
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1547 93.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.50 — — — -0.21
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1526 90.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — +0.21
Career — 1682 111.1 — — — — +8 +42 — 46.5% -0.32 12–14 (46%) 2–9 (18%) 94.5 +5.42 — 1944 143.5 — — — — +1 +5 -153 53.9% +0.36 32–43 (43%) 38–21 (64%) 100.1 -2.42

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.