H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Sherry Acker vs Anna Maria Fernandez H2H: 1-1
Sherry Acker and Anna Maria Fernandez are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Anna Maria Fernandez leads 1–0 on carpet, while Sherry Acker leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anna Maria Fernandez won the 1983 Tokyo Queen's third round 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 67
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
Age 65
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 15, 1983* | Tokyo Queen's | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Anna Maria Fernandez | 6-1 6-4 | Sherry Acker | Match data |
| Aug 24, 1983* | Mahwah | WTA 250 | R64 | Hard | Sherry Acker | 6-3 6-4 | Anna Maria Fernandez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sherry Acker | — | — | — | 1,840 | 63 | 100 | 38.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Anna Maria Fernandez | — | — | — | 1,717 | 54 | 97 | 35.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sherry Acker | Anna Maria Fernandez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 10–4 | 71.4% | — | 1,715 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 0–6 | 0.0% | — | 1,635 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 4–9 | 30.8% | — | 1,568 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1979 | 13–21 | 38.2% | — | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 6–5 | 54.5% | — | 1,615 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1980 | 29–31 | 48.3% | — | 1,829 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 9–10 | 47.4% | — | 1,595 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1981 | 8–19 | 29.6% | — | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 9–21 | 30.0% | — | 1,547 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1982 | 1–5 | 16.7% | — | 1,629 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 2–9 | 18.2% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1983 | 11–15 | 42.3% | — | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,475 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1984 | 1–9 | 10.0% | — | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 2–7 | 22.2% | — | 1,430 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 8–16 | 33.3% | — | 1,426 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,436 | 0 | 1 |