H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Shinobu Asagoe vs Conchita Martínez H2H: 0-1

Conchita Martínez holds a 1–0 lead over Shinobu Asagoe in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Conchita Martínez leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Conchita Martínez won the 2005 Dubai Tennis Championships round of 32 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Shinobu Asagoe
JPN Age 50 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Conchita Martínez
ESP Age 54 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Conchita Martínez #35 6-3 6-4 Shinobu Asagoe #26 Match data Mar 3, 2005* R32 Dubai Tennis Championships Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Shinobu Asagoe #215 #21 1,254 1,761 95 121 44.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Conchita Martínez #1,498 #2 3,180 2,263 676 279 70.8% 1 9 0 7 16 33

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Shinobu Asagoe Conchita Martínez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1988 14–6 70.0% #41 1,729 0 1
17 — — — — — — — 1989 35–9 79.5% #7 1,927 0 4
18 — — — — — — — 1990 38–10 79.2% #11 2,061 0 7
19 — — — — — — — 1991 36–12 75.0% #9 2,076 0 10
20 — — — — — — — 1992 47–17 73.4% #8 2,057 0 11
21 1997 1–1 50.0% #158 1,526 0 0 1993 66–13 83.5% #4 2,159 0 16
22 1998 0–3 0.0% #157 1,486 0 0 1994 51–14 78.5% #3 2,064 1 20
23 1999 3–3 50.0% #122 1,507 0 0 1995 57–10 85.1% #2 2,182 1 26
24 2000 9–9 50.0% #72 1,580 0 0 1996 47–17 73.4% #5 2,066 1 28
25 2001 10–20 33.3% #108 1,536 0 0 1997 37–19 66.1% #12 2,010 1 28
26 2002 5–9 35.7% #96 1,521 0 0 1998 38–16 70.4% #8 1,967 1 30
27 2003 19–15 55.9% #45 1,665 0 0 1999 38–22 63.3% #15 1,898 1 31
28 2004 19–22 46.3% #37 1,633 0 0 2000 49–20 71.0% #5 1,922 1 32
29 2005 25–25 50.0% #38 1,629 0 0 2001 19–13 59.4% #35 1,843 1 32
30 2006 4–14 22.2% #215 1,529 0 0 2002 26–24 52.0% #34 1,755 1 32
31 — — — — — — — 2003 29–21 58.0% #18 1,755 1 32
32 — — — — — — — 2004 20–17 54.1% #42 1,752 1 32
33 — — — — — — — 2005 29–19 60.4% #31 1,799 1 33

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Shinobu Asagoe Conchita Martínez
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 5 1 6 83.3% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 20 4 24 83.3% 13 3 16 81.3% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 17 3 20 85.0% 18 5 23 78.3% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 8 6 14 57.1% 24 3 27 88.9% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 13 5 18 72.2% 21 5 26 80.8% 3 2 5 60.0% 10 5 15 66.7%
21 1997 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 28 6 34 82.4% 20 3 23 87.0% 5 1 6 83.3% 13 3 16 81.3%
22 1998 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1994 20 7 27 74.1% 21 4 25 84.0% 7 0 7 100.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
23 1999 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 25 5 30 83.3% 24 1 25 96.0% 5 1 6 83.3% 3 3 6 50.0%
24 2000 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1996 19 7 26 73.1% 17 5 22 77.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 7 3 10 70.0%
25 2001 5 13 18 27.8% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 1997 17 8 25 68.0% 14 6 20 70.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 4 8 50.0%
26 2002 3 7 10 30.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1998 18 9 27 66.7% 17 4 21 81.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3%
27 2003 8 11 19 42.1% 3 2 5 60.0% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — — 1999 14 11 25 56.0% 20 6 26 76.9% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 4 6 33.3%
28 2004 13 15 28 46.4% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2000 25 12 37 67.6% 20 5 25 80.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
29 2005 15 16 31 48.4% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 2001 4 4 8 50.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 2006 3 7 10 30.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2002 16 14 30 53.3% 8 9 17 47.1% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 13 13 26 50.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 9 10 19 47.4% 10 5 15 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 20 12 32 62.5% 6 5 11 54.5% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
Career — 57 80 137 41.6% 14 20 34 41.2% 16 14 30 53.3% 8 7 15 53.3% — 291 137 428 68.0% 279 85 364 76.6% 48 19 67 71.6% 58 38 96 60.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Shinobu Asagoe Conchita Martínez
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1730 145.2 — — — — -22 -81 — 65.2% +1.39 4–2 (67%) 4–1 (80%) 106.6 +0.57
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1928 154.3 — — — — -62 -75 — 77.2% +2.01 3–3 (50%) 3–0 (100%) 102.5 +1.51
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 2062 158.8 — — — — -43 -68 — 75.7% +1.82 5–2 (71%) 6–3 (67%) 105.9 -1.28
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 2076 163.5 — — — — -95 +132 — 72.1% +1.48 5–3 (63%) 2–1 (67%) 99.7 -3.74
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 2058 170.3 — — — — -34 +215 -444 70.6% +1.60 8–7 (53%) 5–0 (100%) 103.4 -3.06
21 1997 1526 110.2 — — — — — — — 50.0% -1.75 — — — -0.11 1993 2160 168.9 — — — — -45 +158 -369 79.8% +2.22 10–4 (71%) 5–2 (71%) 102.8 +1.51
22 1998 1486 97.8 — — — — — — — 14.3% -2.43 0–1 — — +0.03 1994 2065 167.5 — — — — -60 +202 -125 72.3% +1.80 13–5 (72%) 5–6 (45%) 103.9 -0.84
23 1999 1508 112.7 — — — — +48 — — 53.8% +0.38 0–1 — — +0.71 1995 2182 174.1 — — — — -103 +200 -185 77.9% +2.36 13–4 (76%) 8–3 (73%) 106.8 -1.30
24 2000 1581 117.7 — — — — +9 — +37 47.8% -0.28 6–4 (60%) — — +1.09 1996 2067 172.1 — — — — -13 +243 +14 70.6% +1.81 8–7 (53%) 3–8 (27%) 93.2 -0.86
25 2001 1536 116.8 — — — — +31 -47 — 37.0% -1.04 6–7 (46%) 4–5 (44%) 97.8 -0.76 1997 2010 168.8 — — — — +12 +183 +59 61.9% +1.14 10–4 (71%) 4–3 (57%) 100.5 -0.78
26 2002 1521 114.2 — — — — +9 — — 41.2% -0.09 2–4 (33%) 0–4 (0%) 94.9 +0.18 1998 1968 163.0 — — — — -9 +240 +102 66.7% +1.41 9–6 (60%) 5–6 (45%) 97.0 +0.15
27 2003 1666 120.4 +0.37 -0.93 0.956 48.9% -107 -121 +142 51.9% -0.18 8–3 (73%) 8–2 (80%) 109.8 +0.32 1999 1898 159.2 — — — — -48 +259 +117 60.1% +0.91 11–7 (61%) 4–4 (50%) 101.6 -1.25
28 2004 1634 121.9 -0.67 -0.92 0.898 47.5% -54 -33 +147 45.2% -0.45 7–6 (54%) 2–5 (29%) 100.7 +0.66 2000 1923 160.0 — — — — -33 +232 — 65.1% +0.97 13–5 (72%) 7–1 (88%) 106.8 +0.60
29 2005 1630 136.0 +0.96 +0.30 1.068 51.2% +17 -25 +68 48.1% +0.09 4–6 (40%) 5–10 (33%) 93.3 +1.21 2001 1844 131.6 — — — — -41 +234 +229 58.9% +0.57 4–5 (44%) 4–1 (80%) 94.7 +2.93
30 2006 1530 106.1 -3.53 -1.20 0.839 46.4% +60 -24 — 26.8% -1.73 2–5 (29%) 1–2 (33%) 95.4 -0.69 2002 1756 136.7 — — — — +1 +131 +317 52.6% +0.14 7–13 (35%) 7–6 (54%) 91.8 +0.17
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1756 135.1 +0.69 +3.18 1.111 52.4% -58 +154 +313 57.1% +0.35 5–6 (45%) 4–2 (67%) 99.0 -0.01
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1752 150.1 +1.60 +0.47 1.017 49.5% -42 +159 +267 54.9% +0.76 3–7 (30%) 0–3 (0%) 91.9 -0.78
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1799 146.1 -0.23 +0.73 0.939 49.0% +2 +89 +156 57.0% +0.49 7–5 (58%) 3–3 (50%) 101.4 -1.48
50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1772 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
52 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1745 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1761 126.0 -1.08 -0.77 0.919 48.2% -7 -44 +107 43.9% -0.46 35–37 (49%) 20–28 (42%) 95.6 +1.23 — 2263 167.3 +0.69 +2.03 1.051 51.0% -38 +158 +18 67.3% +1.36 138–95 (59%) 79–53 (60%) 103.6 -0.83

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.