H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Shinobu Asagoe vs Janet Lee H2H: 1-0
Shinobu Asagoe holds a 1–0 lead over Janet Lee in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Shinobu Asagoe leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Shinobu Asagoe won the 2003 Wimbledon first round 6-3 7-6(2).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 50
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
TPE
Age 49
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 25, 2003* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Shinobu Asagoe | 6-3 7-6(2) | Janet Lee | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shinobu Asagoe | #215 | #21 | 1,254 | 1,769 | 95 | 119 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Janet Lee | #863 | #79 | 390 | 1,560 | 31 | 67 | 31.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Shinobu Asagoe | Janet Lee | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #547 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #270 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #169 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #175 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #114 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1997 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #158 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #86 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1998 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #157 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #95 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1999 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #122 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #117 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2000 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #72 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #111 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2001 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #108 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #217 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2002 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #96 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #162 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2003 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #45 | 1,666 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2004 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #37 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #694 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2005 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #38 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2006 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #215 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |