H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Shinobu Asagoe vs Linda Wild H2H: 2-0
Shinobu Asagoe holds a 2–0 lead over Linda Wild in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Shinobu Asagoe leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Shinobu Asagoe won the 1999 Quebec City third round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 50
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 55
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4, 1999* | Quebec City | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Shinobu Asagoe | 6-4 6-2 | Linda Wild | Match data |
| Apr 15, 1999* | Tokyo | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Shinobu Asagoe | 6-3 6-1 | Linda Wild | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shinobu Asagoe | #215 | #21 | 1,254 | 1,769 | 95 | 119 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Linda Wild | #252 | #23 | 823 | 1,823 | 135 | 146 | 48.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Shinobu Asagoe | Linda Wild | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #155 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #86 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #41 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1997 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #158 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #49 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1998 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #157 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #45 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1999 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #122 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #49 | 1,741 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2000 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #72 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 17–13 | 56.7% | #58 | 1,758 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2001 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #108 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #29 | 1,817 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2002 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #96 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #223 | 1,629 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 2003 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #45 | 1,666 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2004 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #37 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,570 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | 2005 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #38 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #252 | 1,543 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | 2006 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #215 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |