H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Shinobu Asagoe vs Maria Vento-Kabchi H2H: 2-0
Shinobu Asagoe holds a 2–0 lead over Maria Vento-Kabchi in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Shinobu Asagoe leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Shinobu Asagoe won the 2005 Japan Open third round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 50
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
VEN
Age 52
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 6, 2005* | Japan Open | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Shinobu Asagoe | 6-3 6-3 | Maria Vento-Kabchi | Match data |
| Jun 14, 2003* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | QF | Grass | Shinobu Asagoe | 4-6 6-2 7-6(3) | Maria Vento-Kabchi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shinobu Asagoe | #215 | #21 | 1,254 | 1,769 | 95 | 119 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Maria Vento-Kabchi | #996 | #26 | 1,053 | 1,716 | 95 | 156 | 37.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Shinobu Asagoe | Maria Vento-Kabchi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #551 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #166 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1997 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #158 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #86 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1998 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #157 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #139 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1999 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #122 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 11–7 | 61.1% | #51 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2000 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #72 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #43 | 1,653 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2001 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #108 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 3–16 | 15.8% | #110 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2002 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #96 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #104 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2003 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #45 | 1,666 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #155 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2004 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #37 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #172 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2005 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #38 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 15–8 | 65.2% | #44 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2006 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #215 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 18–26 | 40.9% | #48 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 13–23 | 36.1% | #62 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 2–12 | 14.3% | #324 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |