H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Shinobu Asagoe vs Mashona Washington H2H: 1-1
Shinobu Asagoe and Mashona Washington are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Shinobu Asagoe leads 1–0 on clay, while Mashona Washington leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Shinobu Asagoe won the 2005 Amelia Island second round 7-5 4-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 50
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 50
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 6, 2005* | Amelia Island | WTA 500 | R64 | Clay | Shinobu Asagoe | 7-5 4-6 6-4 | Mashona Washington | Match data |
| Nov 5, 1999* | Quebec City | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Mashona Washington | 6-3 6-1 | Shinobu Asagoe | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shinobu Asagoe | #215 | #21 | 1,254 | 1,769 | 95 | 119 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mashona Washington | #990 | #50 | 676 | 1,647 | 42 | 76 | 35.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Shinobu Asagoe | Mashona Washington | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #407 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1997 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #158 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1998 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #157 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #165 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1999 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #122 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #130 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2000 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #72 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #142 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2001 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #108 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #134 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2002 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #96 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #109 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2003 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #45 | 1,666 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #199 | 1,441 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2004 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #37 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #53 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2005 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #38 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #73 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2006 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #215 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #230 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #309 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #364 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |