H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Shinobu Asagoe vs Meghann Shaughnessy H2H: 2-1
Shinobu Asagoe holds a 2–1 lead over Meghann Shaughnessy in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Shinobu Asagoe leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Shinobu Asagoe won the 2005 Charleston third round W/O.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 50
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 47
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 14, 2005* | Charleston | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Shinobu Asagoe | (w/o) | Meghann Shaughnessy | Match data |
| Jul 28, 2004* | San Diego | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Shinobu Asagoe | 6-2 (ret.) | Meghann Shaughnessy | Match data |
| Aug 13, 2001 | Toronto | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Meghann Shaughnessy | 6-0 6-4 | Shinobu Asagoe | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shinobu Asagoe | #215 | #21 | 1,254 | 1,769 | 95 | 119 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Meghann Shaughnessy | #1,104 | #11 | 1,949 | 1,888 | 233 | 233 | 50.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Shinobu Asagoe | Meghann Shaughnessy | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #165 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #198 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #69 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 10–22 | 31.2% | #99 | 1,439 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1997 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #158 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #38 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1998 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #157 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 45–25 | 64.3% | #12 | 1,825 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1999 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #122 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 29–27 | 51.8% | #30 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2000 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #72 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #17 | 1,725 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2001 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #108 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #40 | 1,663 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2002 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #96 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #66 | 1,563 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2003 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #45 | 1,666 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #37 | 1,709 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 2004 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #37 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #52 | 1,666 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | 2005 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #38 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #836 | 1,579 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | 2006 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #215 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #590 | 1,533 | 0 | 6 |