H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Shinobu Asagoe vs Meilen Tu H2H: 1-1
Shinobu Asagoe and Meilen Tu are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Shinobu Asagoe leads 1–0 on grass, while Meilen Tu leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Shinobu Asagoe won the 2005 Birmingham third round 6-1 4-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 50
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 48
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 9, 2005* | Birmingham | WTA 500 | R32 | Grass | Shinobu Asagoe | 6-1 4-6 6-1 | Meilen Tu | Match data |
| Apr 16, 1999* | Tokyo | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Meilen Tu | 2-6 6-3 6-3 | Shinobu Asagoe | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shinobu Asagoe | #215 | #21 | 1,254 | 1,769 | 95 | 119 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Meilen Tu | #1,136 | #35 | 769 | 1,692 | 103 | 163 | 38.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Shinobu Asagoe | Meilen Tu | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #160 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #161 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #157 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #81 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #209 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1997 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #158 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #103 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1998 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #157 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #67 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1999 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #122 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #45 | 1,615 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2000 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #72 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 16–24 | 40.0% | #73 | 1,561 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2001 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #108 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #143 | 1,478 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2002 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #96 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #162 | 1,464 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2003 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #45 | 1,666 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #120 | 1,474 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2004 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #37 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #90 | 1,532 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2005 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #38 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #47 | 1,625 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2006 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #215 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #630 | 1,546 | 0 | 1 |