Shinobu Asagoe
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ai Sugiyama | 1 | 5 | 6 | Oct 21, 2004 | H2H |
| Maria Sharapova | 1 | 4 | 5 | Sep 24, 2005 | H2H |
| Lisa Raymond | 1 | 4 | 5 | Jun 16, 2005 | H2H |
| Patty Schnyder | 2 | 2 | 4 | Jan 19, 2006 | H2H |
| Alina Jidkova | 3 | 1 | 4 | Aug 18, 2005 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC
Monica Seles holds a 2–0 lead over Shinobu Asagoe in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Monica Seles leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Monica Seles won the 2001 Oklahoma City semifinal 6-7(5) 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Monica Seles | 6-7(5) 6-2 6-2 | Shinobu Asagoe | Match data | Feb 24, 2001* | SF | Oklahoma City | Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Carpet |
| Monica Seles | 6-3 6-4 | Shinobu Asagoe | Match data | Oct 7, 2000* | QF | Toyota Princess Cup | Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shinobu Asagoe | #215 | #21 | 1,254 | 1,761 | 95 | 121 | 44.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Monica Seles | #223 | #1 | 4,056 | 2,540 | 586 | 123 | 82.7% | 9 | 9 | 3 | 21 | 11 | 53 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Shinobu Asagoe | Monica Seles | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #86 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 33–9 | 78.6% | #6 | 2,005 | 0 | 1 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 55–6 | 90.2% | #2 | 2,296 | 1 | 10 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 74–6 | 92.5% | #1 | 2,444 | 4 | 20 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 70–5 | 93.3% | #1 | 2,500 | 7 | 30 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 17–2 | 89.5% | #8 | 2,486 | 8 | 32 |
| 21 | 1997 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #158 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 11–1 | 91.7% | #1 | 2,488 | 8 | 33 |
| 22 | 1998 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #157 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 46–9 | 83.6% | #2 | 2,344 | 9 | 38 |
| 23 | 1999 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #122 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 45–14 | 76.3% | #5 | 2,180 | 9 | 41 |
| 24 | 2000 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #72 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 42–13 | 76.4% | #6 | 2,180 | 9 | 43 |
| 25 | 2001 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #108 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 36–12 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,120 | 9 | 44 |
| 26 | 2002 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #96 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 56–13 | 81.2% | #4 | 2,153 | 9 | 47 |
| 27 | 2003 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #45 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 40–10 | 80.0% | #10 | 2,132 | 9 | 51 |
| 28 | 2004 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #37 | 1,633 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 46–13 | 78.0% | #7 | 2,091 | 9 | 53 |
| 29 | 2005 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #38 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #60 | 1,994 | 9 | 53 |
| 30 | 2006 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #215 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Shinobu Asagoe | Monica Seles | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | 10 | 1 | 11 | 90.9% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 14 | 5 | 19 | 73.7% |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 18 | 2 | 20 | 90.0% | 22 | 0 | 22 | 100.0% | 4 | 1 | 5 | 80.0% | 11 | 3 | 14 | 78.6% |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 40 | 3 | 43 | 93.0% | 19 | 2 | 21 | 90.5% | — | — | — | — | 15 | 1 | 16 | 93.8% |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 33 | 3 | 36 | 91.7% | 19 | 1 | 20 | 95.0% | 6 | 1 | 7 | 85.7% | 12 | 0 | 12 | 100.0% |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 11 | 1 | 12 | 91.7% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | 4 | 0 | 4 | 100.0% |
| 21 | 1997 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 11 | 1 | 12 | 91.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1998 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 29 | 2 | 31 | 93.5% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | 5 | 1 | 6 | 83.3% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% |
| 23 | 1999 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 27 | 5 | 32 | 84.4% | 13 | 4 | 17 | 76.5% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% |
| 24 | 2000 | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | — | — | — | — | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1998 | 20 | 5 | 25 | 80.0% | 11 | 4 | 15 | 73.3% | 4 | 1 | 5 | 80.0% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% |
| 25 | 2001 | 5 | 13 | 18 | 27.8% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 1999 | 21 | 7 | 28 | 75.0% | 11 | 2 | 13 | 84.6% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% |
| 26 | 2002 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 28 | 9 | 37 | 75.7% | 17 | 2 | 19 | 89.5% | 4 | 1 | 5 | 80.0% | 7 | 1 | 8 | 87.5% |
| 27 | 2003 | 8 | 11 | 19 | 42.1% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 8 | 2 | 10 | 80.0% | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 36 | 9 | 45 | 80.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 4 | 0 | 4 | 100.0% |
| 28 | 2004 | 13 | 15 | 28 | 46.4% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2002 | 27 | 8 | 35 | 77.1% | 9 | 2 | 11 | 81.8% | 4 | 1 | 5 | 80.0% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% |
| 29 | 2005 | 15 | 16 | 31 | 48.4% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 2003 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% |
| 30 | 2006 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 57 | 80 | 137 | 41.6% | 14 | 20 | 34 | 41.2% | 16 | 14 | 30 | 53.3% | 8 | 7 | 15 | 53.3% | — | 316 | 63 | 379 | 83.4% | 142 | 25 | 167 | 85.0% | 35 | 11 | 46 | 76.1% | 93 | 24 | 117 | 79.5% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 39/143 of Shinobu Asagoe's and 1/17 of Monica Seles's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Shinobu Asagoe | Monica Seles | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 27 | 2003 | 8/34 | 0.8 | 2.0 | 71.8% | 61.9% | 43.1% | 49.0% | 39.1% | 56.6% | 41.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2004 | 10/41 | 1.2 | 2.2 | 70.5% | 55.1% | 48.0% | 45.9% | 52.2% | 53.2% | 42.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2005 | 8/50 | 1.1 | 2.1 | 69.5% | 62.7% | 45.8% | 46.7% | 49.0% | 57.9% | 44.9% | 2003 | 1/17 | 1.0 | 12.0 | 54.2% | 50.0% | 25.9% | 40.0% | 28.6% | 39.0% | 42.9% |
| 30 | 2006 | 13/18 | 0.9 | 4.2 | 61.9% | 57.1% | 37.4% | 48.7% | 55.5% | 49.9% | 42.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 39/216 | 1.0 | 2.8 | 67.7% | 58.7% | 43.0% | 47.6% | 50.0% | 53.8% | 42.5% | — | 1/709 | 1.0 | 12.0 | 54.2% | 50.0% | 25.9% | 40.0% | 28.6% | 39.0% | 42.9% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Shinobu Asagoe | Monica Seles | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 1600 | 134.7 | — | — | — | — | +49 | — | — | 58.8% | +0.29 | 1–0 | 2–1 (67%) | — | -0.41 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 2005 | 170.5 | — | — | — | — | -46 | -209 | -385 | 75.8% | +2.03 | 6–3 (67%) | 3–4 (43%) | 107.2 | -0.76 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 2297 | 179.4 | — | — | — | — | -85 | -99 | -561 | 84.8% | +2.78 | 7–3 (70%) | 7–1 (88%) | 110.0 | -3.90 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 2445 | 183.7 | — | — | — | — | 0 | -66 | — | 86.9% | +3.17 | 10–3 (77%) | 4–3 (57%) | 105.2 | -3.24 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 2501 | 182.5 | — | — | — | — | +9 | -35 | -586 | 88.2% | +3.24 | 10–1 (91%) | 2–2 (50%) | 107.7 | -2.26 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 2486 | 173.2 | — | — | — | — | +21 | -78 | — | 85.4% | +3.27 | 4–1 (80%) | 1–2 (33%) | — | -0.84 |
| 21 | 1997 | 1526 | 110.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 50.0% | -1.75 | — | — | — | -0.11 | 1995 | 2488 | 169.9 | — | — | — | — | +5 | — | — | 92.0% | +3.80 | 0–1 | 1–1 | — | -0.63 |
| 22 | 1998 | 1486 | 97.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 14.3% | -2.43 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.03 | 1996 | 2344 | 176.3 | — | — | — | — | +27 | +5 | -308 | 83.5% | +2.58 | 4–3 (57%) | 8–3 (73%) | 96.5 | -0.42 |
| 23 | 1999 | 1508 | 112.7 | — | — | — | — | +48 | — | — | 53.8% | +0.38 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.71 | 1997 | 2181 | 174.0 | — | — | — | — | +75 | +103 | -181 | 72.3% | +1.95 | 10–6 (63%) | 6–9 (40%) | 90.3 | -0.17 |
| 24 | 2000 | 1581 | 117.7 | — | — | — | — | +9 | — | +37 | 47.8% | -0.28 | 6–4 (60%) | — | — | +1.09 | 1998 | 2180 | 173.5 | — | — | — | — | +55 | +77 | -125 | 70.2% | +1.77 | 10–5 (67%) | 4–7 (36%) | 95.0 | -1.32 |
| 25 | 2001 | 1536 | 116.8 | — | — | — | — | +31 | -47 | — | 37.0% | -1.04 | 6–7 (46%) | 4–5 (44%) | 97.8 | -0.76 | 1999 | 2120 | 173.1 | — | — | — | — | +56 | +123 | -164 | 73.3% | +2.05 | 3–2 (60%) | 5–5 (50%) | 97.5 | -0.29 |
| 26 | 2002 | 1521 | 114.2 | — | — | — | — | +9 | — | — | 41.2% | -0.09 | 2–4 (33%) | 0–4 (0%) | 94.9 | +0.18 | 2000 | 2153 | 175.3 | — | — | — | — | +19 | +110 | -86 | 78.0% | +2.03 | 9–5 (64%) | 12–1 (92%) | 106.4 | -2.96 |
| 27 | 2003 | 1666 | 120.4 | +0.37 | -0.93 | 0.956 | 48.9% | -107 | -121 | +142 | 51.9% | -0.18 | 8–3 (73%) | 8–2 (80%) | 109.8 | +0.32 | 2001 | 2132 | 162.9 | — | — | — | — | +27 | — | — | 73.5% | +1.72 | 10–5 (67%) | 5–5 (50%) | 95.6 | +1.21 |
| 28 | 2004 | 1634 | 121.9 | -0.67 | -0.92 | 0.898 | 47.5% | -54 | -33 | +147 | 45.2% | -0.45 | 7–6 (54%) | 2–5 (29%) | 100.7 | +0.66 | 2002 | 2091 | 167.1 | — | — | — | — | +54 | +166 | +47 | 70.1% | +1.67 | 14–4 (78%) | 6–7 (46%) | 102.1 | -1.76 |
| 29 | 2005 | 1630 | 136.0 | +0.96 | +0.30 | 1.068 | 51.2% | +17 | -25 | +68 | 48.1% | +0.09 | 4–6 (40%) | 5–10 (33%) | 93.3 | +1.21 | 2003 | 1995 | 139.5 | +0.40 | +1.10 | 0.702 | 40.9% | +112 | +183 | — | 56.8% | +0.57 | 4–3 (57%) | 3–1 (75%) | 98.7 | -0.67 |
| 30 | 2006 | 1530 | 106.1 | -3.53 | -1.20 | 0.839 | 46.4% | +60 | -24 | — | 26.8% | -1.73 | 2–5 (29%) | 1–2 (33%) | 95.4 | -0.69 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1761 | 126.0 | -1.08 | -0.77 | 0.919 | 48.2% | -7 | -44 | +107 | 43.9% | -0.46 | 35–37 (49%) | 20–28 (42%) | 95.6 | +1.23 | — | 2541 | 181.1 | +0.40 | +1.10 | 0.702 | 40.9% | +21 | +17 | -276 | 78.2% | +2.32 | 102–45 (69%) | 69–52 (57%) | 102.4 | -2.62 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ai Sugiyama | 1 | 5 | 6 | Oct 21, 2004 | H2H |
| Maria Sharapova | 1 | 4 | 5 | Sep 24, 2005 | H2H |
| Lisa Raymond | 1 | 4 | 5 | Jun 16, 2005 | H2H |
| Patty Schnyder | 2 | 2 | 4 | Jan 19, 2006 | H2H |
| Alina Jidkova | 3 | 1 | 4 | Aug 18, 2005 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario | 18 | 3 | 21 | Mar 6, 2002 | H2H |
| Martina Hingis | 5 | 15 | 20 | Sep 3, 2002 | H2H |
| Conchita Martínez | 17 | 1 | 18 | Mar 20, 2002 | H2H |
| Martina Navratilova | 10 | 7 | 17 | Feb 21, 1993 | H2H |
| Mary Joe Fernandez | 15 | 1 | 16 | Jun 5, 1997 | H2H |