H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Shinobu Asagoe vs Virginia Ruano Pascual H2H: 0-2

Virginia Ruano Pascual holds a 2–0 lead over Shinobu Asagoe in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Virginia Ruano Pascual leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Virginia Ruano Pascual won the 2003 Australian Open round of 128 6-2 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Shinobu Asagoe
JPN Age 50 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Virginia Ruano Pascual
ESP Age 52 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Virginia Ruano Pascual #63 6-2 6-1 Shinobu Asagoe #88 Match data Jan 15, 2003* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Virginia Ruano Pascual #78 6-3 6-0 Shinobu Asagoe #53 Match data Mar 22, 2001* R128 Miami Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Shinobu Asagoe #215 #21 1,254 1,761 95 121 44.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Virginia Ruano Pascual #998 #28 893 1,818 200 236 45.9% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Shinobu Asagoe Virginia Ruano Pascual
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1990 0–1 0.0% #307 1,481 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1991 2–2 50.0% #194 1,500 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1992 1–4 20.0% #137 1,493 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1993 6–10 37.5% #126 1,515 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1994 0–4 0.0% #171 1,476 0 0
21 1997 1–1 50.0% #158 1,526 0 0 1995 11–13 45.8% #61 1,562 0 0
22 1998 0–3 0.0% #157 1,486 0 0 1996 9–16 36.0% #87 1,578 0 0
23 1999 3–3 50.0% #122 1,507 0 0 1997 18–10 64.3% #52 1,732 0 1
24 2000 9–9 50.0% #72 1,580 0 0 1998 22–16 57.9% #32 1,776 0 2
25 2001 10–20 33.3% #108 1,536 0 0 1999 12–16 42.9% #85 1,660 0 2
26 2002 5–9 35.7% #96 1,521 0 0 2000 8–8 50.0% #89 1,645 0 2
27 2003 19–15 55.9% #45 1,665 0 0 2001 13–18 41.9% #56 1,607 0 2
28 2004 19–22 46.3% #37 1,633 0 0 2002 19–21 47.5% #65 1,634 0 2
29 2005 25–25 50.0% #38 1,629 0 0 2003 19–17 52.8% #55 1,694 0 3
30 2006 4–14 22.2% #215 1,529 0 0 2004 12–16 42.9% #64 1,645 0 3
31 — — — — — — — 2005 10–18 35.7% #107 1,557 0 3
32 — — — — — — — 2006 15–13 53.6% #66 1,659 0 3
33 — — — — — — — 2007 11–14 44.0% #81 1,629 0 3
34 — — — — — — — 2008 9–12 42.9% #107 1,621 0 3
35 — — — — — — — 2009 3–5 37.5% #200 1,621 0 3
36 — — — — — — — 2010 0–2 0.0% #998 1,592 0 3

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Shinobu Asagoe Virginia Ruano Pascual
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 0 1 1 0.0% 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1997 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 0 2 2 0.0% 10 9 19 52.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
22 1998 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1996 4 6 10 40.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 1999 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1 2 3 33.3% 16 7 23 69.6% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
24 2000 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1998 6 6 12 50.0% 13 8 21 61.9% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2001 5 13 18 27.8% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 1999 6 4 10 60.0% 4 9 13 30.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
26 2002 3 7 10 30.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2000 3 4 7 42.9% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — —
27 2003 8 11 19 42.1% 3 2 5 60.0% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — — 2001 5 7 12 41.7% 7 10 17 41.2% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
28 2004 13 15 28 46.4% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2002 4 8 12 33.3% 14 12 26 53.8% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
29 2005 15 16 31 48.4% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 2003 15 9 24 62.5% 4 6 10 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
30 2006 3 7 10 30.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2004 5 11 16 31.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 7 10 17 41.2% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 10 8 18 55.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 6 7 13 46.2% 3 6 9 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 5 6 11 45.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 57 80 137 41.6% 14 20 34 41.2% 16 14 30 53.3% 8 7 15 53.3% — 78 95 173 45.1% 103 113 216 47.7% 15 18 33 45.5% 4 10 14 28.6%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 39/143 of Shinobu Asagoe's and 79/176 of Virginia Ruano Pascual's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Shinobu Asagoe Virginia Ruano Pascual
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
27 2003 8/34 0.8 2.0 71.8% 61.9% 43.1% 49.0% 39.1% 56.6% 41.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2004 10/41 1.2 2.2 70.5% 55.1% 48.0% 45.9% 52.2% 53.2% 42.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2005 8/50 1.1 2.1 69.5% 62.7% 45.8% 46.7% 49.0% 57.9% 44.9% 2003 3/36 0.3 2.3 72.9% 53.4% 41.5% 68.2% 37.0% 50.4% 38.7%
30 2006 13/18 0.9 4.2 61.9% 57.1% 37.4% 48.7% 55.5% 49.9% 42.1% 2004 8/28 1.3 3.4 70.2% 57.8% 52.2% 52.1% 47.3% 56.2% 48.0%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 3/28 0.3 4.0 62.4% 50.3% 35.5% 47.1% 46.7% 45.6% 48.7%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 16/28 0.6 1.5 71.4% 54.8% 47.0% 44.4% 44.7% 52.4% 43.4%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 20/25 0.7 2.3 70.3% 56.4% 42.0% 44.3% 49.5% 52.0% 41.7%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 19/21 0.4 1.9 71.2% 54.2% 42.7% 44.4% 41.5% 51.2% 43.7%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 8/8 0.5 2.0 71.2% 53.0% 46.4% 49.2% 50.5% 51.5% 41.2%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 2/2 0.0 3.5 72.4% 48.4% 22.6% 44.9% 66.7% 41.2% 33.3%
Career — 39/216 1.0 2.8 67.7% 58.7% 43.0% 47.6% 50.0% 53.8% 42.5% — 79/436 0.6 2.2 70.7% 54.8% 43.9% 46.7% 46.3% 51.7% 43.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Shinobu Asagoe Virginia Ruano Pascual
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1482 96.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -3.00 0–1 1–0 — +0.18
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1500 99.8 — — — — — +51 — 44.4% -1.00 1–0 1–0 — +0.24
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1494 108.5 — — — — — +57 — 20.0% -2.30 — — — -0.36
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1515 112.1 — — — — +6 +45 — 38.9% -0.81 2–2 (50%) 3–3 (50%) 100.6 +0.39
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1477 97.0 — — — — — — — 11.1% -2.33 0–1 — — +0.02
21 1997 1526 110.2 — — — — — — — 50.0% -1.75 — — — -0.11 1995 1563 122.2 — — — — -80 +84 — 44.9% -0.47 1–4 (20%) 4–0 (100%) 101.8 +0.72
22 1998 1486 97.8 — — — — — — — 14.3% -2.43 0–1 — — +0.03 1996 1579 126.8 — — — — -49 +24 — 41.5% -0.58 1–6 (14%) 3–0 (100%) — -0.54
23 1999 1508 112.7 — — — — +48 — — 53.8% +0.38 0–1 — — +0.71 1997 1733 134.8 — — — — -201 +46 — 59.7% +0.73 7–4 (64%) 4–4 (50%) 103.6 +0.26
24 2000 1581 117.7 — — — — +9 — +37 47.8% -0.28 6–4 (60%) — — +1.09 1998 1776 128.0 — — — — -190 +21 -133 52.5% +0.08 8–2 (80%) 3–3 (50%) 105.0 +0.47
25 2001 1536 116.8 — — — — +31 -47 — 37.0% -1.04 6–7 (46%) 4–5 (44%) 97.8 -0.76 1999 1660 125.0 — — — — +3 -16 — 46.0% -0.25 4–5 (44%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.07
26 2002 1521 114.2 — — — — +9 — — 41.2% -0.09 2–4 (33%) 0–4 (0%) 94.9 +0.18 2000 1645 110.8 — — — — -9 +3 — 50.0% -0.22 4–4 (50%) 0–2 — +0.51
27 2003 1666 120.4 +0.37 -0.93 0.956 48.9% -107 -121 +142 51.9% -0.18 8–3 (73%) 8–2 (80%) 109.8 +0.32 2001 1607 125.9 — — — — +10 -10 — 45.8% -0.06 3–7 (30%) 3–4 (43%) 92.5 -0.34
28 2004 1634 121.9 -0.67 -0.92 0.898 47.5% -54 -33 +147 45.2% -0.45 7–6 (54%) 2–5 (29%) 100.7 +0.66 2002 1634 125.4 — — — — -64 +48 — 51.6% +0.16 4–9 (31%) 5–4 (56%) 95.9 +0.57
29 2005 1630 136.0 +0.96 +0.30 1.068 51.2% +17 -25 +68 48.1% +0.09 4–6 (40%) 5–10 (33%) 93.3 +1.21 2003 1695 119.9 -0.97 -0.92 0.780 45.2% +1 -67 — 51.9% -0.21 5–6 (45%) 4–2 (67%) 100.9 +0.46
30 2006 1530 106.1 -3.53 -1.20 0.839 46.4% +60 -24 — 26.8% -1.73 2–5 (29%) 1–2 (33%) 95.4 -0.69 2004 1646 113.0 +0.06 +0.93 1.096 52.2% -62 +26 -34 46.0% -0.48 2–5 (29%) 1–2 (33%) 95.3 -0.60
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1558 111.3 -2.34 +0.61 0.895 47.0% -10 +41 +17 43.7% -0.70 4–11 (27%) 5–4 (56%) 95.2 -0.27
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1660 123.5 -1.95 +0.13 0.913 47.7% -22 -29 -79 53.3% -0.22 2–2 (50%) 4–1 (80%) 101.6 +0.27
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1630 114.4 -2.70 -1.70 0.870 47.0% +1 -49 0 47.3% -0.16 3–4 (43%) 2–5 (29%) 96.3 +0.25
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1622 110.7 -3.08 -0.59 0.894 47.2% -6 -63 +17 41.7% -0.65 4–2 (67%) 1–4 (20%) 99.8 -0.37
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1621 116.1 -1.29 -1.20 0.849 46.4% -17 -30 — 35.3% -1.00 1–0 — — -0.67
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1592 94.6 -3.08 -1.43 0.568 37.4% — — — 0.0% -4.25 — — — 0.00
Career — 1761 126.0 -1.08 -0.77 0.919 48.2% -7 -44 +107 43.9% -0.46 35–37 (49%) 20–28 (42%) 95.6 +1.23 — 1819 126.4 -2.15 -0.62 0.891 47.4% -34 +18 -37 47.2% -0.29 56–75 (43%) 46–39 (54%) 97.4 +0.29

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.