H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Shuai Peng vs Amélie Mauresmo H2H: 1-1

Shuai Peng and Amélie Mauresmo are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Amélie Mauresmo won the 2008 Miami Open round of 64 4-6 6-2 7-6(2).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Shuai Peng
CHN Age 40 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Amélie Mauresmo
FRA Age 47 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Amélie Mauresmo #24 4-6 6-2 7-6(2) Shuai Peng #56 Match data Mar 26, 2008* R64 Miami Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Shuai Peng #49 4-6 6-4 6-2 Amélie Mauresmo #10 Match data Sep 22, 2007* QF China Open Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Shuai Peng #820 #14 2,825 1,907 301 263 53.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Amélie Mauresmo #21 #1 4,992 2,225 463 185 71.5% 2 6 1 15 1 25

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Shuai Peng Amélie Mauresmo
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2001 0–1 0.0% #518 1,493 0 0 1995 0–1 0.0% #250 1,488 0 0
16 2002 0–1 0.0% #366 1,484 0 0 1996 2–2 50.0% #180 1,522 0 0
17 2003 0–2 0.0% #221 1,455 0 0 1997 4–6 40.0% #100 1,556 0 0
18 2004 5–4 55.6% #80 1,516 0 0 1998 20–18 52.6% #29 1,728 0 0
19 2005 20–16 55.6% #36 1,680 0 0 1999 32–14 69.6% #10 1,911 0 1
20 2006 18–17 51.4% #55 1,729 0 0 2000 26–13 66.7% #16 1,906 0 2
21 2007 19–17 52.8% #45 1,738 0 0 2001 43–12 78.2% #9 2,022 0 6
22 2008 25–23 52.1% #40 1,707 0 0 2002 45–15 75.0% #6 2,061 0 8
23 2009 23–22 51.1% #46 1,773 0 0 2003 45–17 72.6% #4 2,065 0 10
24 2010 15–13 53.6% #72 1,760 0 0 2004 61–12 83.6% #2 2,178 0 15
25 2011 48–23 67.6% #17 1,840 0 0 2005 53–16 76.8% #3 2,133 0 19
26 2012 22–23 48.9% #40 1,707 0 0 2006 50–14 78.1% #3 2,165 2 23
27 2013 18–18 50.0% #42 1,656 0 0 2007 27–14 65.9% #18 1,972 2 24
28 2014 28–22 56.0% #21 1,746 0 0 2008 30–19 61.2% #24 1,820 2 24
29 2015 6–7 46.2% #137 1,701 0 0 2009 25–12 67.6% #21 1,873 2 25
30 2016 8–11 42.1% #84 1,660 0 1 — — — — — — —
31 2017 36–22 62.1% #27 1,794 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 2018 1–9 10.0% #125 1,723 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 2019 7–9 43.8% #109 1,670 0 2 — — — — — — —
34 2020 2–3 40.0% #117 1,627 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Shuai Peng Amélie Mauresmo
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 2001 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
16 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
17 2003 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0%
18 2004 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1998 9 7 16 56.3% 8 6 14 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0%
19 2005 13 9 22 59.1% 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1999 19 7 26 73.1% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — — 6 3 9 66.7%
20 2006 6 9 15 40.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2000 8 5 13 61.5% 13 4 17 76.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
21 2007 14 13 27 51.9% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2001 15 7 22 68.2% 16 3 19 84.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 10 1 11 90.9%
22 2008 19 16 35 54.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2002 25 5 30 83.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 7 2 9 77.8% 6 3 9 66.7%
23 2009 17 14 31 54.8% 5 7 12 41.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2003 23 11 34 67.6% 15 3 18 83.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 2 8 75.0%
24 2010 6 8 14 42.9% 9 5 14 64.3% — — — — — — — — 2004 35 7 42 83.3% 19 3 22 86.4% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — —
25 2011 32 15 47 68.1% 10 5 15 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 2005 36 10 46 78.3% 9 2 11 81.8% 5 2 7 71.4% 3 2 5 60.0%
26 2012 16 16 32 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2006 32 10 42 76.2% 6 2 8 75.0% 7 1 8 87.5% 5 1 6 83.3%
27 2013 10 12 22 45.5% 7 5 12 58.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2007 13 7 20 65.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
28 2014 19 13 32 59.4% 6 7 13 46.2% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2008 21 14 35 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
29 2015 6 5 11 54.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2009 12 7 19 63.2% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 0 5 100.0%
30 2016 8 7 15 53.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2017 29 16 45 64.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 0 4 4 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 7 9 16 43.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 209 176 385 54.3% 68 64 132 51.5% 24 21 45 53.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — 248 97 345 71.9% 118 46 164 72.0% 44 19 63 69.8% 53 23 76 69.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 451/553 of Shuai Peng's and 222/395 of Amélie Mauresmo's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Shuai Peng Amélie Mauresmo
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 2005 5/36 2.6 2.6 61.4% 60.8% 37.6% 50.9% 53.6% 53.2% 54.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2006 19/35 2.0 2.5 64.1% 56.9% 41.5% 48.6% 49.0% 51.0% 42.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2007 30/36 2.7 1.5 65.5% 61.9% 52.3% 56.6% 43.5% 58.3% 45.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2008 34/48 2.1 2.1 68.0% 60.8% 48.5% 49.1% 48.0% 56.8% 47.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2009 42/45 1.6 1.9 67.7% 60.9% 47.4% 48.7% 47.7% 56.5% 44.5% 2003 10/62 2.3 2.9 63.3% 73.3% 50.3% 41.3% 41.8% 65.2% 48.3%
24 2010 24/28 1.0 1.7 70.1% 61.3% 50.6% 44.9% 43.8% 58.0% 44.3% 2004 18/73 4.5 4.4 58.2% 74.6% 52.0% 54.6% 50.2% 65.2% 51.1%
25 2011 65/71 2.3 1.8 68.3% 66.5% 48.1% 53.5% 47.4% 60.5% 45.7% 2005 24/69 3.2 4.3 58.0% 72.7% 50.1% 57.2% 55.5% 63.0% 47.6%
26 2012 40/45 2.8 2.3 66.8% 64.1% 47.3% 44.4% 52.1% 58.4% 42.4% 2006 55/64 2.6 2.9 64.8% 68.0% 49.1% 60.4% 53.9% 61.2% 47.1%
27 2013 35/36 2.1 2.6 65.1% 62.3% 44.6% 52.6% 47.6% 55.9% 44.7% 2007 36/41 4.4 4.8 61.2% 69.9% 45.6% 56.1% 53.4% 60.6% 45.7%
28 2014 43/50 2.7 2.4 63.3% 64.2% 46.5% 53.4% 53.6% 57.5% 42.3% 2008 45/49 3.3 6.3 61.4% 67.4% 43.0% 56.0% 51.2% 57.9% 47.5%
29 2015 13/13 3.0 3.2 63.2% 59.9% 44.5% 44.8% 38.1% 54.2% 41.2% 2009 34/37 4.0 5.5 60.2% 67.0% 45.7% 55.9% 48.6% 58.9% 45.1%
30 2016 14/21 2.0 1.8 61.4% 60.2% 45.4% 54.0% 45.8% 54.7% 36.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2017 57/58 1.7 2.2 63.7% 63.7% 47.7% 55.3% 49.4% 57.8% 47.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 9/10 1.8 2.9 63.8% 60.8% 46.5% 57.7% 47.4% 56.2% 33.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 16/16 1.6 2.1 67.6% 62.3% 44.1% 51.6% 41.3% 56.1% 43.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 5/5 1.2 1.4 71.8% 63.2% 52.9% 53.4% 56.9% 60.0% 43.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 451/566 2.1 2.1 66.0% 62.7% 47.2% 51.4% 48.0% 57.3% 44.3% — 222/648 3.5 4.6 61.5% 69.3% 47.2% 56.4% 51.8% 60.8% 47.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Shuai Peng Amélie Mauresmo
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 2001 1494 102.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.19 1995 1488 98.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.12
16 2002 1485 102.4 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 — — -0.02 1996 1523 102.5 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.20 1–1 — — +0.03
17 2003 1455 96.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.25 — — — +0.22 1997 1556 126.4 — — — — -24 +36 — 48.0% -0.08 1–4 (20%) 1–2 (33%) 97.2 -0.06
18 2004 1516 114.6 — — — — +25 — — 50.0% +0.60 2–0 — — +0.25 1998 1729 146.0 — — — — -83 0 -114 51.2% +0.12 5–3 (63%) 5–4 (56%) 107.0 -0.59
19 2005 1680 142.9 -0.36 +4.21 1.154 53.6% -27 -58 — 56.8% +0.53 2–6 (25%) 3–5 (38%) 95.0 +0.12 1999 1912 159.1 — — — — -27 -138 — 61.2% +0.73 12–5 (71%) 5–5 (50%) 109.0 +1.67
20 2006 1729 119.5 -2.95 -1.68 0.858 46.7% -74 -31 -96 53.5% -0.15 5–4 (56%) 2–1 (67%) 103.6 -0.81 2000 1907 163.5 — — — — -30 +17 — 64.6% +1.38 5–7 (42%) 4–7 (36%) 93.9 -1.71
21 2007 1738 140.7 +2.26 +2.00 1.092 51.8% -34 +14 — 53.2% +0.52 5–6 (45%) 2–3 (40%) 98.4 -0.16 2001 2023 167.1 — — — — -34 +99 -402 70.7% +1.41 14–3 (82%) 10–3 (77%) 113.0 -2.74
22 2008 1707 128.9 +0.94 +2.05 1.097 52.0% -3 -20 -79 53.3% +0.38 4–11 (27%) 7–3 (70%) 97.0 +1.57 2002 2062 162.6 — — — — +32 -20 -255 74.0% +1.75 6–7 (46%) 10–5 (67%) 98.8 -0.13
23 2009 1773 142.5 +1.21 +1.78 1.022 50.6% +16 -138 — 52.0% +0.22 7–9 (44%) 6–3 (67%) 101.4 -1.70 2003 2065 163.0 +5.99 +3.35 1.388 56.1% +3 +92 — 69.4% +1.11 13–5 (72%) 13–2 (87%) 108.6 -2.28
24 2010 1760 128.8 +1.83 +0.38 1.056 51.1% +2 -76 — 51.6% +0.14 7–7 (50%) 2–3 (40%) 97.6 -1.67 2004 2178 168.3 +7.28 +5.47 1.468 57.6% +1 +37 -262 78.5% +2.20 14–6 (70%) 8–5 (62%) 104.3 -0.48
25 2011 1840 146.6 +4.59 +2.04 1.157 53.1% +11 -74 -116 64.2% +1.13 18–8 (69%) 7–9 (44%) 105.6 +1.38 2005 2133 167.1 +5.80 +3.65 1.286 55.4% +23 +95 -185 72.0% +1.48 10–6 (63%) 7–2 (78%) 102.5 -0.83
26 2012 1708 129.2 +1.71 -0.73 1.018 50.2% +13 +6 +50 52.0% +0.11 8–8 (50%) 5–5 (50%) 96.7 +1.22 2006 2166 170.3 +5.44 +4.78 1.215 54.1% +18 +5 -62 70.5% +1.49 15–4 (79%) 8–3 (73%) 108.7 -3.85
27 2013 1656 128.2 +0.33 +0.95 1.015 50.5% -3 +77 — 50.6% +0.07 7–5 (58%) 3–3 (50%) 99.6 -0.24 2007 1973 149.7 +4.23 +2.32 1.159 53.0% +81 +133 +141 63.4% +1.04 6–9 (40%) 6–8 (43%) 89.6 -1.04
28 2014 1747 135.0 +1.13 -0.79 0.996 50.1% -12 -53 +25 57.1% +0.46 7–6 (54%) 5–6 (45%) 99.7 +0.27 2008 1820 135.6 +2.15 +2.79 1.128 52.5% +25 +198 +234 56.9% +0.66 14–8 (64%) 8–9 (47%) 94.5 +0.52
29 2015 1701 126.5 -2.49 +0.54 0.900 47.6% +36 — — 53.6% -0.04 1–3 (25%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.02 2009 1873 146.4 +3.25 +2.00 1.095 52.0% +15 +92 +120 61.4% +0.83 12–4 (75%) 5–5 (50%) 103.7 -1.60
30 2016 1660 114.8 +0.32 -3.37 0.812 46.4% +54 — +28 41.5% -0.78 2–5 (29%) 3–4 (43%) 95.6 +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2017 1794 144.9 +1.43 +3.25 1.114 52.3% +9 -153 -47 59.8% +0.67 9–7 (56%) 9–6 (60%) 102.1 -1.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 1724 109.2 -0.92 -4.14 0.764 45.6% +31 -67 — 21.7% -1.91 0–3 (0%) — — -0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 1670 122.1 -0.89 +0.34 0.993 49.8% +20 — — 51.4% -0.34 1–4 (20%) 4–1 (80%) 97.5 +0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 1627 111.9 +1.00 -0.04 1.097 52.2% +20 — — 41.7% 0.00 1–1 0–2 — +0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1908 141.0 +1.33 +0.93 1.037 50.8% +2 -48 -41 53.9% +0.30 86–94 (48%) 60–55 (52%) 98.4 -0.11 — 2226 166.5 +4.45 +3.42 1.200 53.8% +5 +46 -86 66.9% +1.23 128–73 (64%) 90–60 (60%) 108.0 -2.04

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.