H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Shuai Peng vs Marina Erakovic H2H: 1-1

Shuai Peng and Marina Erakovic are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass. Most recently, Marina Erakovic won the 2013 Wimbledon round of 64 7-6(6) 6-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Shuai Peng
CHN Age 40 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Marina Erakovic
New Zealand Age 38 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Marina Erakovic #71 7-6(6) 6-6 Shuai Peng #26 Match data Jun 28, 2013* R64 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Shuai Peng #20 6-4 4-6 6-3 Marina Erakovic #151 Match data Jun 11, 2011* QF Birmingham International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Shuai Peng #820 #14 2,825 1,907 301 263 53.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Marina Erakovic #827 #39 1,392 1,695 104 133 43.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Shuai Peng Marina Erakovic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2001 0–1 0.0% #518 1,493 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 2002 0–1 0.0% #366 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2003 0–2 0.0% #221 1,455 0 0 2005 1–1 50.0% #213 1,498 0 0
18 2004 5–4 55.6% #80 1,516 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2005 20–16 55.6% #36 1,680 0 0 2007 1–5 16.7% #153 1,457 0 0
20 2006 18–17 51.4% #55 1,729 0 0 2008 16–17 48.5% #66 1,517 0 0
21 2007 19–17 52.8% #45 1,738 0 0 2009 4–7 36.4% #227 1,514 0 0
22 2008 25–23 52.1% #40 1,707 0 0 2010 2–7 22.2% #333 1,480 0 0
23 2009 23–22 51.1% #46 1,773 0 0 2011 11–8 57.9% #61 1,627 0 0
24 2010 15–13 53.6% #72 1,760 0 0 2012 19–21 47.5% #66 1,583 0 0
25 2011 48–23 67.6% #17 1,840 0 0 2013 20–16 55.6% #46 1,669 0 1
26 2012 22–23 48.9% #40 1,707 0 0 2014 12–20 37.5% #76 1,607 0 1
27 2013 18–18 50.0% #42 1,656 0 0 2015 7–14 33.3% #135 1,542 0 1
28 2014 28–22 56.0% #21 1,746 0 0 2016 10–8 55.6% #106 1,620 0 1
29 2015 6–7 46.2% #137 1,701 0 0 2017 1–9 10.0% #197 1,547 0 1
30 2016 8–11 42.1% #84 1,660 0 1 — — — — — — —
31 2017 36–22 62.1% #27 1,794 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 2018 1–9 10.0% #125 1,723 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 2019 7–9 43.8% #109 1,670 0 2 — — — — — — —
34 2020 2–3 40.0% #117 1,627 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Shuai Peng Marina Erakovic
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 2001 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2003 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2004 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 13 9 22 59.1% 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2007 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2006 6 9 15 40.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2008 8 11 19 42.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — —
21 2007 14 13 27 51.9% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2009 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2008 19 16 35 54.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2010 0 6 6 0.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
23 2009 17 14 31 54.8% 5 7 12 41.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2011 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
24 2010 6 8 14 42.9% 9 5 14 64.3% — — — — — — — — 2012 9 10 19 47.4% 7 7 14 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — —
25 2011 32 15 47 68.1% 10 5 15 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 2013 13 10 23 56.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
26 2012 16 16 32 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2014 10 13 23 43.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2013 10 12 22 45.5% 7 5 12 58.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2015 5 6 11 45.5% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
28 2014 19 13 32 59.4% 6 7 13 46.2% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2016 1 3 4 25.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
29 2015 6 5 11 54.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2017 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 2016 8 7 15 53.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2017 29 16 45 64.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 0 4 4 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 7 9 16 43.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 209 176 385 54.3% 68 64 132 51.5% 24 21 45 53.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — 60 83 143 42.0% 20 28 48 41.7% 24 21 45 53.3% 0 1 1 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 451/553 of Shuai Peng's and 219/235 of Marina Erakovic's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Shuai Peng Marina Erakovic
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 2005 5/36 2.6 2.6 61.4% 60.8% 37.6% 50.9% 53.6% 53.2% 54.0% 2007 5/6 2.4 3.6 56.9% 62.4% 42.7% 39.4% 61.3% 54.4% 41.8%
20 2006 19/35 2.0 2.5 64.1% 56.9% 41.5% 48.6% 49.0% 51.0% 42.0% 2008 29/33 5.4 3.4 58.8% 68.1% 47.4% 54.2% 45.7% 59.3% 40.8%
21 2007 30/36 2.7 1.5 65.5% 61.9% 52.3% 56.6% 43.5% 58.3% 45.5% 2009 11/11 3.8 4.9 57.0% 64.8% 38.5% 56.9% 55.6% 53.7% 40.2%
22 2008 34/48 2.1 2.1 68.0% 60.8% 48.5% 49.1% 48.0% 56.8% 47.4% 2010 9/9 4.7 4.1 61.1% 62.6% 41.2% 53.6% 51.8% 54.2% 37.6%
23 2009 42/45 1.6 1.9 67.7% 60.9% 47.4% 48.7% 47.7% 56.5% 44.5% 2011 18/19 4.4 3.1 63.9% 65.5% 44.4% 59.2% 39.3% 58.1% 42.5%
24 2010 24/28 1.0 1.7 70.1% 61.3% 50.6% 44.9% 43.8% 58.0% 44.3% 2012 38/40 3.8 3.4 54.4% 68.8% 46.5% 53.9% 42.7% 58.3% 42.6%
25 2011 65/71 2.3 1.8 68.3% 66.5% 48.1% 53.5% 47.4% 60.5% 45.7% 2013 29/36 4.2 4.9 57.0% 70.7% 45.0% 51.7% 47.3% 59.7% 44.4%
26 2012 40/45 2.8 2.3 66.8% 64.1% 47.3% 44.4% 52.1% 58.4% 42.4% 2014 31/32 2.8 3.8 60.3% 65.6% 42.5% 49.3% 46.9% 56.3% 41.9%
27 2013 35/36 2.1 2.6 65.1% 62.3% 44.6% 52.6% 47.6% 55.9% 44.7% 2015 21/21 3.8 3.6 61.0% 66.3% 50.9% 53.1% 41.0% 60.4% 38.0%
28 2014 43/50 2.7 2.4 63.3% 64.2% 46.5% 53.4% 53.6% 57.5% 42.3% 2016 18/18 2.3 4.4 64.7% 61.7% 44.5% 51.8% 50.1% 56.1% 43.0%
29 2015 13/13 3.0 3.2 63.2% 59.9% 44.5% 44.8% 38.1% 54.2% 41.2% 2017 10/10 2.0 5.6 57.0% 65.1% 39.1% 48.2% 43.8% 54.1% 36.1%
30 2016 14/21 2.0 1.8 61.4% 60.2% 45.4% 54.0% 45.8% 54.7% 36.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2017 57/58 1.7 2.2 63.7% 63.7% 47.7% 55.3% 49.4% 57.8% 47.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 9/10 1.8 2.9 63.8% 60.8% 46.5% 57.7% 47.4% 56.2% 33.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 16/16 1.6 2.1 67.6% 62.3% 44.1% 51.6% 41.3% 56.1% 43.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 5/5 1.2 1.4 71.8% 63.2% 52.9% 53.4% 56.9% 60.0% 43.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 451/566 2.1 2.1 66.0% 62.7% 47.2% 51.4% 48.0% 57.3% 44.3% — 219/237 3.8 3.9 59.0% 66.6% 44.9% 52.7% 46.0% 57.7% 41.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Shuai Peng Marina Erakovic
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 2001 1494 102.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2002 1485 102.4 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 — — -0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2003 1455 96.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.25 — — — +0.22 2005 1498 95.1 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.00 1–0 — — +0.29
18 2004 1516 114.6 — — — — +25 — — 50.0% +0.60 2–0 — — +0.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 1680 142.9 -0.36 +4.21 1.154 53.6% -27 -58 — 56.8% +0.53 2–6 (25%) 3–5 (38%) 95.0 +0.12 2007 1457 98.0 -0.61 -2.50 0.916 48.2% +5 — — 21.4% -1.36 1–1 — — +0.10
20 2006 1729 119.5 -2.95 -1.68 0.858 46.7% -74 -31 -96 53.5% -0.15 5–4 (56%) 2–1 (67%) 103.6 -0.81 2008 1518 119.1 +1.94 -2.96 1.003 49.8% -43 +12 +208 48.7% -0.08 6–6 (50%) 5–7 (42%) 99.1 +1.05
21 2007 1738 140.7 +2.26 +2.00 1.092 51.8% -34 +14 — 53.2% +0.52 5–6 (45%) 2–3 (40%) 98.4 -0.16 2009 1514 108.9 -1.10 -1.98 0.869 47.5% -38 — — 42.3% -0.92 1–3 (25%) 1–0 — -0.07
22 2008 1707 128.9 +0.94 +2.05 1.097 52.0% -3 -20 -79 53.3% +0.38 4–11 (27%) 7–3 (70%) 97.0 +1.57 2010 1480 102.7 -1.18 -3.79 0.820 45.9% -44 — +254 25.0% -1.70 1–1 0–3 (0%) — -0.06
23 2009 1773 142.5 +1.21 +1.78 1.022 50.6% +16 -138 — 52.0% +0.22 7–9 (44%) 6–3 (67%) 101.4 -1.70 2011 1627 118.5 +1.72 -1.34 1.015 50.1% -74 — +125 55.3% +0.02 5–4 (56%) 1–0 — +0.24
24 2010 1760 128.8 +1.83 +0.38 1.056 51.1% +2 -76 — 51.6% +0.14 7–7 (50%) 2–3 (40%) 97.6 -1.67 2012 1584 114.0 +1.58 -1.34 1.023 50.5% -11 -33 +124 44.0% -0.37 9–6 (60%) 5–3 (63%) 104.2 +1.89
25 2011 1840 146.6 +4.59 +2.04 1.157 53.1% +11 -74 -116 64.2% +1.13 18–8 (69%) 7–9 (44%) 105.6 +1.38 2013 1670 123.7 +2.86 -0.04 1.101 51.9% -29 -101 +64 53.0% +0.21 7–7 (50%) 10–4 (71%) 106.7 +0.26
26 2012 1708 129.2 +1.71 -0.73 1.018 50.2% +13 +6 +50 52.0% +0.11 8–8 (50%) 5–5 (50%) 96.7 +1.22 2014 1608 123.2 -0.48 -1.04 0.958 49.3% +12 -33 +39 40.8% -0.31 4–5 (44%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.33
27 2013 1656 128.2 +0.33 +0.95 1.015 50.5% -3 +77 — 50.6% +0.07 7–5 (58%) 3–3 (50%) 99.6 -0.24 2015 1542 117.9 +1.24 -2.64 0.961 48.9% +77 -39 +69 44.7% -0.23 2–7 (22%) 2–3 (40%) 95.1 -0.36
28 2014 1747 135.0 +1.13 -0.79 0.996 50.1% -12 -53 +25 57.1% +0.46 7–6 (54%) 5–6 (45%) 99.7 +0.27 2016 1620 110.9 +0.21 -1.18 0.978 49.7% -22 +11 +15 48.7% -0.26 4–3 (57%) 5–4 (56%) 102.4 +0.55
29 2015 1701 126.5 -2.49 +0.54 0.900 47.6% +36 — — 53.6% -0.04 1–3 (25%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.02 2017 1548 105.9 -0.90 -2.01 0.788 45.4% +27 — — 15.8% -1.84 0–1 0–3 (0%) — -0.44
30 2016 1660 114.8 +0.32 -3.37 0.812 46.4% +54 — +28 41.5% -0.78 2–5 (29%) 3–4 (43%) 95.6 +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2017 1794 144.9 +1.43 +3.25 1.114 52.3% +9 -153 -47 59.8% +0.67 9–7 (56%) 9–6 (60%) 102.1 -1.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 1724 109.2 -0.92 -4.14 0.764 45.6% +31 -67 — 21.7% -1.91 0–3 (0%) — — -0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 1670 122.1 -0.89 +0.34 0.993 49.8% +20 — — 51.4% -0.34 1–4 (20%) 4–1 (80%) 97.5 +0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 1627 111.9 +1.00 -0.04 1.097 52.2% +20 — — 41.7% 0.00 1–1 0–2 — +0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1908 141.0 +1.33 +0.93 1.037 50.8% +2 -48 -41 53.9% +0.30 86–94 (48%) 60–55 (52%) 98.4 -0.11 — 1696 119.6 +0.96 -1.64 0.979 49.6% -14 -29 +123 44.6% -0.34 41–44 (48%) 31–29 (52%) 102.9 +1.32

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.