H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Shuai Peng vs Monica Niculescu H2H: 3-3

Shuai Peng and Monica Niculescu are tied 3–3 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Monica Niculescu leads 3–2 on hard courts, while Shuai Peng leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Shuai Peng won the 2017 Beijing third round 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Shuai Peng
CHN Age 40 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
3 – 3
6 main draw meetings
Monica Niculescu
ROU Age 38 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 4, 2017 Beijing WTA 1000 R32 Hard Shuai Peng #25 6-3 6-2 Monica Niculescu #65 Match data
Mar 23, 2016* Miami WTA 1000 R64 Hard Monica Niculescu #33 6-1 3-6 6-0 Shuai Peng #664 Match data
May 15, 2013* Rome WTA 1000 R64 Clay Shuai Peng #38 4-6 6-3 6-2 Monica Niculescu #46 Match data
Jan 11, 2013* Hobart WTA 250 R16 Hard Monica Niculescu #54 3-6 6-4 6-4 Shuai Peng #33 Match data
Feb 18, 2009* Dubai WTA 1000 R64 Hard Monica Niculescu #48 3-6 7-5 6-2 Shuai Peng #33 Match data
Oct 4, 2008* Tashkent WTA 250 QF Hard Shuai Peng #40 6-7(6) 6-2 6-4 Monica Niculescu #70 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Shuai Peng #820 #14 2,825 1,890 300 258 53.8% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Monica Niculescu #958 #28 1,960 1,807 176 213 45.2% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Shuai Peng Monica Niculescu
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2001 0–1 0.0% #518 1,493 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 2002 0–1 0.0% #366 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2003 0–2 0.0% #221 1,455 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2004 5–4 55.6% #80 1,516 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2005 20–16 55.6% #36 1,678 0 0 2007 0–1 0.0% #152 1,490 0 0
20 2006 18–17 51.4% #55 1,727 0 0 2008 8–15 34.8% #48 1,542 0 0
21 2007 19–17 52.8% #45 1,737 0 0 2009 10–22 31.2% #103 1,522 0 0
22 2008 24–22 52.2% #40 1,706 0 0 2010 6–9 40.0% #82 1,573 0 0
23 2009 23–22 51.1% #46 1,770 0 0 2011 21–15 58.3% #30 1,755 0 0
24 2010 15–13 53.6% #72 1,742 0 0 2012 15–23 39.5% #58 1,639 0 0
25 2011 48–23 67.6% #17 1,817 0 0 2013 22–21 51.2% #59 1,637 0 1
26 2012 21–22 48.8% #40 1,699 0 0 2014 22–19 53.7% #46 1,687 0 2
27 2013 18–18 50.0% #42 1,657 0 0 2015 20–21 48.8% #39 1,677 0 2
28 2014 28–22 56.0% #21 1,743 0 0 2016 25–17 59.5% #38 1,782 0 3
29 2015 6–7 46.2% #137 1,698 0 0 2017 10–19 34.5% #77 1,618 0 3
30 2016 8–10 44.4% #84 1,711 0 1 2018 9–15 37.5% #99 1,588 0 3
31 2017 37–21 63.8% #27 1,815 0 2 2019 8–11 42.1% #118 1,627 0 3
32 2018 1–8 11.1% #125 1,741 0 2 2020 0–2 0.0% #144 1,579 0 3
33 2019 7–9 43.8% #109 1,679 0 2 2021 0–3 0.0% #274 1,514 0 3
34 2020 2–3 40.0% #117 1,636 0 2 — — — — — — —