H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 08:10 UTC

Shuai Peng vs Nadia Petrova H2H: 4-4

Shuai Peng and Nadia Petrova are tied 4–4 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Nadia Petrova leads 4–3 on hard courts, while Shuai Peng leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Shuai Peng won the 2014 Doha second round 7-6(5) 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Shuai Peng
CHN Age 40 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
4 – 4
8 main draw meetings
Nadia Petrova
RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 12, 2014* Doha WTA 1000 R64 Hard Shuai Peng #44 7-6(5) 7-5 Nadia Petrova #100 Match data
Sep 26, 2012* Tokyo WTA 1000 R64 Hard Nadia Petrova #18 6-1 6-4 Shuai Peng #46 Match data
Nov 6, 2011* Tournament of Champions WTA Finals QF Hard Nadia Petrova #31 6-4 6-3 Shuai Peng #16 Match data
Apr 8, 2011* Charleston WTA 500 R16 Clay Shuai Peng #30 6-3 5-7 6-2 Nadia Petrova #22 Match data
Mar 11, 2011* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R16 Hard Shuai Peng #36 6-4 5-7 6-3 Nadia Petrova #20 Match data
Mar 11, 2010* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R32 Hard Nadia Petrova #19 6-1 7-5 Shuai Peng #56 Match data
Oct 10, 2009* Beijing WTA 1000 QF Hard Nadia Petrova #17 6-7(5) 6-3 6-2 Shuai Peng #53 Match data
Jan 15, 2005* Sydney WTA 500 QF Hard Shuai Peng #80 6-3 4-2 (ret.) Nadia Petrova #13 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Shuai Peng #820 #14 2,825 1,890 300 258 53.8% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Nadia Petrova #578 #3 3,882 2,077 441 276 61.5% 0 3 1 7 2 13

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Shuai Peng Nadia Petrova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2001 0–1 0.0% #518 1,493 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 2002 0–1 0.0% #366 1,484 0 0 1998 2–2 50.0% #145 1,536 0 0
17 2003 0–2 0.0% #221 1,455 0 0 1999 3–5 37.5% #93 1,568 0 0
18 2004 5–4 55.6% #80 1,516 0 0 2000 12–15 44.4% #60 1,624 0 0
19 2005 20–16 55.6% #36 1,678 0 0 2001 20–21 48.8% #39 1,682 0 0
20 2006 18–17 51.4% #55 1,727 0 0 2002 7–5 58.3% #112 1,758 0 0
21 2007 19–17 52.8% #45 1,737 0 0 2003 36–20 64.3% #12 1,924 0 0
22 2008 24–22 52.2% #40 1,706 0 0 2004 39–24 61.9% #12 1,880 0 0
23 2009 23–22 51.1% #46 1,770 0 0 2005 56–25 69.1% #9 1,945 0 1
24 2010 15–13 53.6% #72 1,742 0 0 2006 48–19 71.6% #6 1,990 0 6
25 2011 48–23 67.6% #17 1,817 0 0 2007 37–18 67.3% #14 1,931 0 7
26 2012 21–22 48.8% #40 1,699 0 0 2008 47–24 66.2% #11 1,923 0 9
27 2013 18–18 50.0% #42 1,657 0 0 2009 30–21 58.8% #20 1,821 0 9
28 2014 28–22 56.0% #21 1,743 0 0 2010 32–20 61.5% #15 1,828 0 9
29 2015 6–7 46.2% #137 1,698 0 0 2011 25–21 54.3% #29 1,781 0 10
30 2016 8–10 44.4% #84 1,711 0 1 2012 37–18 67.3% #12 1,917 0 13
31 2017 37–21 63.8% #27 1,815 0 2 2013 9–13 40.9% #104 1,718 0 13
32 2018 1–8 11.1% #125 1,741 0 2 2014 1–5 16.7% #362 1,648 0 13
33 2019 7–9 43.8% #109 1,679 0 2 — — — — — — —
34 2020 2–3 40.0% #117 1,636 0 2 — — — — — — —