H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Shuai Peng vs Serena Williams H2H: 0-3

Serena Williams holds a 3–0 lead over Shuai Peng in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Serena Williams leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Serena Williams won the 2014 Madrid third round 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Shuai Peng
CHN Age 40 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0 – 3
3 main draw meetings
Serena Williams
USA Age 44 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 8, 2014* Madrid WTA 1000 R32 Clay Serena Williams #1 6-2 6-3 Shuai Peng #42 Match data
Mar 26, 2009* Miami WTA 1000 R32 Hard Serena Williams #1 7-5 6-2 Shuai Peng #34 Match data
Jan 24, 2009* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Serena Williams #2 6-1 6-4 Shuai Peng #41 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Shuai Peng #820 #14 2,825 1,890 300 258 53.8% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Serena Williams #320 #1 13,615 2,405 825 170 82.9% 23 23 5 17 3 71

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Shuai Peng Serena Williams
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2001 0–1 0.0% #518 1,493 0 0 1997 3–2 60.0% #101 1,582 0 0
16 2002 0–1 0.0% #366 1,484 0 0 1998 26–11 70.3% #20 1,895 0 0
17 2003 0–2 0.0% #221 1,455 0 0 1999 37–7 84.1% #4 2,170 1 4
18 2004 5–4 55.6% #80 1,516 0 0 2000 37–8 82.2% #6 2,174 1 7
19 2005 20–16 55.6% #36 1,678 0 0 2001 40–7 85.1% #6 2,259 1 10
20 2006 18–17 51.4% #55 1,727 0 0 2002 57–5 91.9% #1 2,348 4 18
21 2007 19–17 52.8% #45 1,737 0 0 2003 36–3 92.3% #3 2,369 6 22
22 2008 24–22 52.2% #40 1,706 0 0 2004 39–11 78.0% #7 2,192 6 24
23 2009 23–22 51.1% #46 1,770 0 0 2005 21–9 70.0% #11 2,028 7 25
24 2010 15–13 53.6% #72 1,742 0 0 2006 12–4 75.0% #95 2,016 7 25
25 2011 48–23 67.6% #17 1,817 0 0 2007 34–10 77.3% #7 2,058 8 27
26 2012 21–22 48.8% #40 1,699 0 0 2008 41–8 83.7% #2 2,109 9 31
27 2013 18–18 50.0% #42 1,657 0 0 2009 50–13 79.4% #1 2,106 11 34
28 2014 28–22 56.0% #21 1,743 0 0 2010 25–4 86.2% #4 2,149 13 36
29 2015 6–7 46.2% #137 1,698 0 0 2011 22–4 84.6% #12 2,155 13 38
30 2016 8–10 44.4% #84 1,711 0 1 2012 48–6 88.9% #3 2,239 15 44
31 2017 37–21 63.8% #27 1,815 0 2 2013 77–5 93.9% #1 2,345 17 55
32 2018 1–8 11.1% #125 1,741 0 2 2014 52–10 83.9% #1 2,209 18 62
33 2019 7–9 43.8% #109 1,679 0 2 2015 50–6 89.3% #1 2,197 21 67
34 2020 2–3 40.0% #117 1,636 0 2 2016 36–5 87.8% #2 2,177 22 69
35 — — — — — — — 2017 8–1 88.9% #22 2,172 23 70
36 — — — — — — — 2018 18–7 72.0% #16 2,078 23 70
37 — — — — — — — 2019 25–8 75.8% #10 2,052 23 70
38 — — — — — — — 2020 16–5 76.2% #11 1,991 23 71
39 — — — — — — — 2021 12–6 66.7% #41 1,950 23 71
40 — — — — — — — 2022 3–4 42.9% #320 1,891 23 71
44 — — — — — — — 2026 0–1 0.0% #320 — 23 71