H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Shuai Peng vs Shahar Peer H2H: 4-3

Shuai Peng holds a 4–3 lead over Shahar Peer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Shuai Peng leads 3–2 on hard courts, while Shahar Peer leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Shuai Peng won the 2014 Tianjin third round 7-5 4-6 6-2.

CHN Age 40 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
4 3
7 main draw meetings
ISR Age 39 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 9, 2014* Tianjin WTA 250 R32 Hard Shuai Peng #22 7-5 4-6 6-2 Shahar Peer #130 Match data
Sep 19, 2013* Guangzhou WTA 250 R32 Hard Shuai Peng #38 6-3 6-4 Shahar Peer #85 Match data
May 16, 2012* Rome WTA 1000 R64 Clay Shahar Peer #54 7-6(4) 4-6 3-1 (ret.) Shuai Peng #23 Match data
Aug 19, 2011* Cincinnati WTA 1000 R16 Hard Shuai Peng #15 6-3 6-2 Shahar Peer #24 Match data
Sep 19, 2009* Guangzhou WTA 250 SF Hard Shahar Peer #57 6-4 1-0 (ret.) Shuai Peng #48 Match data
Aug 9, 2006* Los Angeles WTA 500 R64 Hard Shahar Peer #25 6-1 6-0 Shuai Peng #54 Match data
Jun 29, 2006* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Shuai Peng #46 6-4 7-6(5) Shahar Peer #24 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Shuai Peng #820 #14 2,825 1,890 300 258 53.8% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Shahar Peer #1,185 #11 3,410 1,966 268 204 56.8% 0 0 0 1 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Shuai Peng Shahar Peer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2001 0–1 0.0% #518 1,493 0 0
16 2002 0–1 0.0% #366 1,484 0 0
17 2003 0–2 0.0% #221 1,455 0 0 2004 3–3 50.0% #176 1,509 0 0
18 2004 5–4 55.6% #80 1,516 0 0 2005 22–20 52.4% #45 1,636 0 0
19 2005 20–16 55.6% #36 1,678 0 0 2006 38–20 65.5% #20 1,826 0 3
20 2006 18–17 51.4% #55 1,727 0 0 2007 39–21 65.0% #17 1,830 0 3
21 2007 19–17 52.8% #45 1,737 0 0 2008 24–20 54.5% #38 1,707 0 3
22 2008 24–22 52.2% #40 1,706 0 0 2009 36–21 63.2% #30 1,787 0 5
23 2009 23–22 51.1% #46 1,770 0 0 2010 47–21 69.1% #13 1,885 0 5
24 2010 15–13 53.6% #72 1,742 0 0 2011 23–21 52.3% #37 1,706 0 5
25 2011 48–23 67.6% #17 1,817 0 0 2012 15–22 40.5% #74 1,584 0 5
26 2012 21–22 48.8% #40 1,699 0 0 2013 10–14 41.7% #77 1,558 0 5
27 2013 18–18 50.0% #42 1,657 0 0 2014 10–18 35.7% #117 1,539 0 5
28 2014 28–22 56.0% #21 1,743 0 0 2015 1–3 25.0% #177 1,526 0 5
29 2015 6–7 46.2% #137 1,698 0 0
30 2016 8–10 44.4% #84 1,711 0 1
31 2017 37–21 63.8% #27 1,815 0 2
32 2018 1–8 11.1% #125 1,741 0 2
33 2019 7–9 43.8% #109 1,679 0 2
34 2020 2–3 40.0% #117 1,636 0 2