H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Shuai Peng vs Sofia Arvidsson H2H: 3-1

Shuai Peng holds a 3–1 lead over Sofia Arvidsson in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Shuai Peng leads 2–1 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Shuai Peng won the 2013 Brussels third round 6-3 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Shuai Peng
CHN Age 40 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Sofia Arvidsson
SWE Age 42 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 23, 2013* Brussels WTA 500 R32 Clay Shuai Peng #34 6-3 6-0 Sofia Arvidsson #57 Match data
Mar 19, 2013* Miami WTA 1000 R128 Hard Shuai Peng #34 6-3 6-2 Sofia Arvidsson #51 Match data
May 24, 2012* Brussels WTA 500 R32 Clay Sofia Arvidsson #62 7-5 6-3 Shuai Peng #30 Match data
May 21, 2011* Brussels WTA 500 QF Clay Shuai Peng #31 6-2 6-4 Sofia Arvidsson #76 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Shuai Peng #820 #14 2,825 1,890 300 258 53.8% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Sofia Arvidsson #320 #29 1,380 1,775 113 154 42.3% 0 0 0 1 1 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Shuai Peng Sofia Arvidsson
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2001 0–1 0.0% #518 1,493 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 2002 0–1 0.0% #366 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2003 0–2 0.0% #221 1,455 0 0 2001 0–1 0.0% #437 1,489 0 0
18 2004 5–4 55.6% #80 1,516 0 0 2002 0–1 0.0% #144 1,475 0 0
19 2005 20–16 55.6% #36 1,678 0 0 2003 2–3 40.0% #104 1,482 0 0
20 2006 18–17 51.4% #55 1,727 0 0 2004 1–6 14.3% #213 1,434 0 0
21 2007 19–17 52.8% #45 1,737 0 0 2005 13–8 61.9% #67 1,598 0 0
22 2008 24–22 52.2% #40 1,706 0 0 2006 16–19 45.7% #62 1,537 0 1
23 2009 23–22 51.1% #46 1,770 0 0 2007 6–11 35.3% #98 1,508 0 1
24 2010 15–13 53.6% #72 1,742 0 0 2008 12–18 40.0% #56 1,519 0 1
25 2011 48–23 67.6% #17 1,817 0 0 2009 0–8 0.0% #139 1,443 0 1
26 2012 21–22 48.8% #40 1,699 0 0 2010 14–16 46.7% #53 1,545 0 1
27 2013 18–18 50.0% #42 1,657 0 0 2011 16–23 41.0% #78 1,627 0 1
28 2014 28–22 56.0% #21 1,743 0 0 2012 27–20 57.4% #41 1,753 0 2
29 2015 6–7 46.2% #137 1,698 0 0 2013 6–18 25.0% #120 1,597 0 2
30 2016 8–10 44.4% #84 1,711 0 1 2014 0–1 0.0% #263 1,581 0 2
31 2017 37–21 63.8% #27 1,815 0 2 2015 0–1 0.0% #320 1,568 0 2
32 2018 1–8 11.1% #125 1,741 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 2019 7–9 43.8% #109 1,679 0 2 — — — — — — —
34 2020 2–3 40.0% #117 1,636 0 2 — — — — — — —