H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Silvia Farina Elia vs Emilie Loit H2H: 1-0
Silvia Farina Elia holds a 1–0 lead over Emilie Loit in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Silvia Farina Elia leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Silvia Farina Elia won the 2002 Gold Coast third round 6-2 4-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 54
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 47
Left-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 2, 2002* | Gold Coast | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Silvia Farina Elia | 6-2 4-6 6-3 | Emilie Loit | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Silvia Farina Elia | #32 | #11 | 1,838 | 1,943 | 365 | 309 | 54.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Emilie Loit | #161 | #27 | 1,016 | 1,780 | 162 | 180 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Silvia Farina Elia | Emilie Loit | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1989 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #172 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1990 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #194 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #243 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1991 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #69 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #96 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1992 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #172 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 3–15 | 16.7% | #101 | 1,424 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1993 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #85 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #101 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1994 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #52 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #95 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1995 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #52 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #58 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1996 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #34 | 1,711 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #41 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1997 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #43 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #45 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1998 | 38–26 | 59.4% | #19 | 1,901 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #82 | 1,546 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1999 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #26 | 1,782 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #56 | 1,621 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2000 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #63 | 1,695 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #43 | 1,609 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2001 | 45–26 | 63.4% | #14 | 1,768 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #137 | 1,513 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2002 | 42–28 | 60.0% | #17 | 1,745 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #161 | 1,531 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2003 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #24 | 1,719 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2004 | 41–23 | 64.1% | #20 | 1,770 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2005 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #32 | 1,648 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |