H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Silvia Farina Elia vs Pam Shriver H2H: 0-1

Pam Shriver holds a 1–0 lead over Silvia Farina Elia in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Pam Shriver leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Pam Shriver won the 1995 Eastbourne third round 7-5 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Silvia Farina Elia
ITA Age 54 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Pam Shriver
USA Age 64 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 22, 1995* Eastbourne WTA 250 R32 Grass Pam Shriver #87 7-5 6-1 Silvia Farina Elia #51 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Silvia Farina Elia #32 #11 1,838 1,943 365 309 54.2% 0 0 0 3 0 3
Pam Shriver #234 #3 163 2,302 624 277 69.3% 0 0 0 4 20 24

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Silvia Farina Elia Pam Shriver
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1978 23–8 74.2% — 1,849 0 1
16 — — — — — — — 1979 16–16 50.0% — 1,798 0 1
17 1989 3–3 50.0% #172 1,522 0 0 1980 47–21 69.1% — 2,027 0 2
18 1990 2–3 40.0% #194 1,527 0 0 1981 58–25 69.9% — 2,122 0 4
19 1991 9–9 50.0% #69 1,590 0 0 1982 47–19 71.2% — 2,087 0 5
20 1992 5–10 33.3% #172 1,578 0 0 1983 52–15 77.6% — 2,161 0 8
21 1993 9–12 42.9% #85 1,587 0 0 1984 44–13 77.2% #4 2,060 0 10
22 1994 20–19 51.3% #52 1,678 0 0 1985 54–13 80.6% #4 2,117 0 14
23 1995 18–16 52.9% #52 1,650 0 0 1986 47–15 75.8% #5 2,194 0 16
24 1996 22–21 51.2% #34 1,711 0 0 1987 60–13 82.2% #4 2,254 0 20
25 1997 16–22 42.1% #43 1,720 0 0 1988 58–14 80.6% #5 2,188 0 24
26 1998 38–26 59.4% #19 1,901 0 0 1989 24–14 63.2% #18 1,955 0 24
27 1999 30–26 53.6% #26 1,782 0 0 1990 8–5 61.5% #66 1,911 0 24
28 2000 15–17 46.9% #63 1,695 0 0 1991 21–18 53.8% #37 1,822 0 24
29 2001 45–26 63.4% #14 1,768 0 1 1992 25–18 58.1% #30 1,858 0 24
30 2002 42–28 60.0% #17 1,745 0 2 1993 14–13 51.9% #38 1,819 0 24
31 2003 25–25 50.0% #24 1,719 0 3 1994 13–16 44.8% #63 1,699 0 24
32 2004 41–23 64.1% #20 1,770 0 3 1995 7–11 38.9% #110 1,649 0 24
33 2005 25–23 52.1% #32 1,648 0 3 1996 4–9 30.8% #189 1,611 0 24
34 — — — — — — — 1997 2–1 66.7% #234 1,635 0 24