H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Sílvia Soler-Espinosa vs Alisa Kleybanova H2H: 0-1
Alisa Kleybanova holds a 1–0 lead over Sílvia Soler-Espinosa in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Alisa Kleybanova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Alisa Kleybanova won the 2009 Madrid second round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 38
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 37
Right-Handed
181 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 13, 2009* | Madrid | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Alisa Kleybanova | 6-3 6-4 | Sílvia Soler-Espinosa | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sílvia Soler-Espinosa | #858 | #54 | 1,157 | 1,643 | 56 | 102 | 35.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Alisa Kleybanova | #784 | #20 | 2,485 | 1,875 | 108 | 92 | 54.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sílvia Soler-Espinosa | Alisa Kleybanova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #368 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #237 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #240 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #32 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 31–24 | 56.4% | #29 | 1,776 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #25 | 1,825 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2009 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #68 | 1,778 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2010 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #167 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #545 | 1,774 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2011 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #81 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #188 | 1,769 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2012 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #83 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #139 | 1,766 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2013 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #82 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2014 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #66 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2015 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #145 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2016 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #128 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2017 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #225 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2018 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #190 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #681 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |