H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Sílvia Soler-Espinosa vs Chanelle Scheepers H2H: 1-1
Sílvia Soler-Espinosa and Chanelle Scheepers are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Sílvia Soler-Espinosa leads 1–0 on clay, while Chanelle Scheepers leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sílvia Soler-Espinosa won the 2014 Roland Garros first round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 38
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
RSA
Age 42
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 28, 2014* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Sílvia Soler-Espinosa | 6-2 6-3 | Chanelle Scheepers | Match data |
| Mar 18, 2014* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Chanelle Scheepers | 6-3 6-0 | Sílvia Soler-Espinosa | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sílvia Soler-Espinosa | #858 | #54 | 1,157 | 1,643 | 56 | 102 | 35.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Chanelle Scheepers | #429 | #37 | 1,505 | 1,725 | 87 | 108 | 44.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sílvia Soler-Espinosa | Chanelle Scheepers | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #299 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2009 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2010 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #167 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2011 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #81 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2012 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #83 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #187 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2013 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #82 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #127 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2014 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #66 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #103 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2015 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #145 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #38 | 1,658 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2016 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #128 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #60 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2017 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #225 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #80 | 1,572 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2018 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #190 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #77 | 1,620 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #681 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #424 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 |