H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Silvija Talaja vs Stephanie Foretz Gacon H2H: 1-0
Silvija Talaja holds a 1–0 lead over Stephanie Foretz Gacon in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Silvija Talaja leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Silvija Talaja won the 2004 Roland Garros second round 2-6 7-6(8) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 48
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
Age 45
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 27, 2004* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Silvija Talaja | 2-6 7-6(8) 6-2 | Stephanie Foretz Gacon | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Silvija Talaja | #1,214 | #18 | 1,376 | 1,811 | 130 | 151 | 46.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Stephanie Foretz Gacon | — | — | — | 1,647 | 61 | 115 | 34.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Silvija Talaja | Stephanie Foretz Gacon | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #288 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1994 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #251 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1995 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #280 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1996 | 9–4 | 69.2% | #106 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1997 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #199 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1998 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #85 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1999 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #29 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 11–12 | 47.8% | — | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2000 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #29 | 1,647 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 12–15 | 44.4% | — | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2001 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #109 | 1,543 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 3–10 | 23.1% | — | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2002 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #74 | 1,559 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 5–14 | 26.3% | — | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2003 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #93 | 1,547 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 5–14 | 26.3% | — | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2004 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #114 | 1,543 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 2–6 | 25.0% | — | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2005 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #190 | 1,507 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,455 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 2–7 | 22.2% | — | 1,421 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,402 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 2–6 | 25.0% | — | 1,406 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 10–10 | 50.0% | — | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |