H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Sloane Stephens vs Andrea Petkovic H2H: 3-1
Sloane Stephens holds a 3–1 lead over Andrea Petkovic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Sloane Stephens leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Sloane Stephens won the 2014 Cincinnati second round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 33
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
GER
Age 38
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 13, 2014* | Cincinnati | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Sloane Stephens | 6-3 6-3 | Andrea Petkovic | Match data |
| Oct 11, 2013* | Linz | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Sloane Stephens | 7-6(1) 4-6 6-3 | Andrea Petkovic | Match data |
| Jun 28, 2013* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Sloane Stephens | 7-6(2) 2-6 8-6 | Andrea Petkovic | Match data |
| Aug 6, 2011* | San Diego | WTA 500 | QF | Hard | Andrea Petkovic | 6-2 6-1 | Sloane Stephens | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sloane Stephens | #315 | #3 | 5,727 | 1,970 | 298 | 240 | 55.4% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 8 |
| Andrea Petkovic | #139 | #9 | 4,640 | 1,990 | 273 | 225 | 54.8% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sloane Stephens | Andrea Petkovic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2010 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #204 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2011 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #96 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #242 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2012 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #38 | 1,709 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #93 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2013 | 40–22 | 64.5% | #12 | 1,831 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #378 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2014 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #36 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #55 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2015 | 34–20 | 63.0% | #30 | 1,798 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #32 | 1,796 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2016 | 21–8 | 72.4% | #35 | 1,800 | 0 | 4 | 2011 | 50–17 | 74.6% | #10 | 1,975 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2017 | 15–7 | 68.2% | #13 | 1,879 | 1 | 5 | 2012 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #125 | 1,857 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2018 | 35–18 | 66.0% | #6 | 1,931 | 1 | 6 | 2013 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #43 | 1,798 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2019 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #25 | 1,789 | 1 | 6 | 2014 | 39–22 | 63.9% | #13 | 1,826 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 2020 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #39 | 1,642 | 1 | 6 | 2015 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #24 | 1,685 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 2021 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #65 | 1,762 | 1 | 6 | 2016 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #55 | 1,702 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | 2022 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #37 | 1,784 | 1 | 7 | 2017 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #99 | 1,631 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | 2023 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #47 | 1,799 | 1 | 7 | 2018 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #64 | 1,700 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | 2024 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #74 | 1,691 | 1 | 8 | 2019 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #78 | 1,712 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | 2025 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #479 | 1,607 | 1 | 8 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #102 | 1,697 | 0 | 6 |
| 33 | 2026 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #315 | 1,616 | 1 | 8 | 2021 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #75 | 1,730 | 0 | 7 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #139 | 1,707 | 0 | 7 |