H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 07:17 UTC
Sloane Stephens vs Anhelina Kalinina H2H: 2-1
Sloane Stephens holds a 2–1 lead over Anhelina Kalinina in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Sloane Stephens leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Anhelina Kalinina leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Sloane Stephens won the 2023 Montreal second round 6-4 7-6(2).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 33
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
UKR
Age 29
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 21, 2026 | Madrid | WTA 1000 | Q1 | Clay | Anhelina Kalinina | 2-6 7-6(5) 6-2 | Sloane Stephens | Match data |
| Aug 9, 2023* | Montreal | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Sloane Stephens | 6-4 7-6(2) | Anhelina Kalinina | Match data |
| Apr 30, 2022* | Madrid | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Anhelina Kalinina | 7-5 6-4 | Sloane Stephens | Match data |
| Aug 30, 2018* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Sloane Stephens | 4-6 7-5 6-2 | Anhelina Kalinina | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sloane Stephens | #315 | #3 | 5,727 | 1,970 | 298 | 240 | 55.4% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 8 |
| Anhelina Kalinina | #59 | #25 | 1,677 | 1,901 | 96 | 106 | 47.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sloane Stephens | Anhelina Kalinina | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2010 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #204 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2011 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #96 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #165 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2012 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #38 | 1,709 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2013 | 40–22 | 64.5% | #12 | 1,831 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2014 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #36 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #107 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2015 | 34–20 | 63.0% | #30 | 1,798 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #161 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2016 | 21–8 | 72.4% | #35 | 1,800 | 0 | 4 | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #163 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2017 | 15–7 | 68.2% | #13 | 1,879 | 1 | 5 | 2021 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #52 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2018 | 35–18 | 66.0% | #6 | 1,931 | 1 | 6 | 2022 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #39 | 1,827 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2019 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #25 | 1,789 | 1 | 6 | 2023 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #28 | 1,772 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2020 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #39 | 1,642 | 1 | 6 | 2024 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #55 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2021 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #65 | 1,762 | 1 | 6 | 2025 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #127 | 1,758 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2022 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #37 | 1,784 | 1 | 7 | 2026 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,794 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2023 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #47 | 1,799 | 1 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2024 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #74 | 1,691 | 1 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2025 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #479 | 1,607 | 1 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2026 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #315 | 1,616 | 1 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |