H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Sloane Stephens vs Coco Vandeweghe H2H: 1-2

Coco Vandeweghe holds a 2–1 lead over Sloane Stephens in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Coco Vandeweghe leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Coco Vandeweghe won the 2018 Porsche Tennis Grand Prix first round 6-1 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sloane Stephens
United States Age 33 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main-draw meetings
Coco Vandeweghe
USA Age 34 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Coco Vandeweghe #16 6-1 6-0 Sloane Stephens #9 Match data Apr 26, 2018* R32 Porsche Tennis Grand Prix Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Clay
Coco Vandeweghe #45 6-4 6-3 Sloane Stephens #29 Match data Sep 2, 2015* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Sloane Stephens #41 6-3 6-4 Coco Vandeweghe #33 Match data May 21, 2015* R16 Strasbourg Open International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Sloane Stephens #209 #3 5,727 1,952 303 249 54.9% 1 1 0 1 5 8
Coco Vandeweghe #815 #9 3,258 1,880 138 152 47.6% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sloane Stephens Coco Vandeweghe
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 2006 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 2007 0–1 0.0% #549 1,479 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 2008 0–3 0.0% #476 1,453 0 0
17 2010 2–3 40.0% #204 1,519 0 0 2009 1–2 33.3% #322 1,465 0 0
18 2011 7–9 43.8% #96 1,580 0 0 2010 6–6 50.0% #116 1,567 0 0
19 2012 21–17 55.3% #38 1,709 0 0 2011 8–13 38.1% #122 1,543 0 0
20 2013 40–22 64.5% #12 1,827 0 0 2012 6–7 46.2% #97 1,605 0 0
21 2014 20–19 51.3% #36 1,732 0 0 2013 5–11 31.2% #113 1,563 0 0
22 2015 34–20 63.0% #30 1,787 0 1 2014 22–14 61.1% #39 1,731 0 1
23 2016 21–10 67.7% #35 1,755 0 4 2015 20–21 48.8% #37 1,726 0 1
24 2017 15–8 65.2% #13 1,863 1 5 2016 22–18 55.0% #36 1,732 0 2
25 2018 34–19 64.2% #6 1,920 1 6 2017 29–18 61.7% #10 1,858 0 2
26 2019 22–19 53.7% #25 1,786 1 6 2018 9–16 36.0% #100 1,690 0 2
27 2020 4–11 26.7% #39 1,641 1 6 2019 1–3 25.0% #241 1,689 0 2
28 2021 18–17 51.4% #65 1,759 1 6 2020 0–2 0.0% #214 1,624 0 2
29 2022 18–17 51.4% #37 1,785 1 7 2021 4–9 30.8% #174 1,591 0 2
30 2023 21–20 51.2% #47 1,789 1 7 2022 4–5 44.4% #128 1,666 0 2
31 2024 19–21 47.5% #74 1,688 1 8 2023 1–2 33.3% #420 1,533 0 2
32 2025 0–5 0.0% #479 1,603 1 8 — — — — — — —
33 2026 7–12 36.8% #209 1,699 1 8 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Sloane Stephens Coco Vandeweghe
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 2010 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2009 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
18 2011 6 6 12 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2010 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — — — — —
19 2012 12 10 22 54.5% 7 6 13 53.8% 2 1 3 66.7% 2011 7 9 16 43.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
20 2013 29 16 45 64.4% 7 5 12 58.3% 4 1 5 80.0% 2012 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 2014 11 10 21 52.4% 6 6 12 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2013 5 7 12 41.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
22 2015 20 13 33 60.6% 8 5 13 61.5% 6 2 8 75.0% 2014 13 11 24 54.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0%
23 2016 10 6 16 62.5% 9 3 12 75.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2015 10 13 23 43.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 8 4 12 66.7%
24 2017 15 7 22 68.2% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2016 10 13 23 43.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 11 2 13 84.6%
25 2018 24 13 37 64.9% 10 5 15 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2017 19 12 31 61.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 3 9 66.7%
26 2019 10 13 23 43.5% 10 4 14 71.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 2018 1 9 10 10.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 3 6 50.0%
27 2020 3 8 11 27.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2019 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2021 6 11 17 35.3% 10 5 15 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 2020 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
29 2022 13 9 22 59.1% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 2021 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
30 2023 12 14 26 46.2% 8 5 13 61.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 2022 1 2 3 33.3% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
31 2024 8 13 21 38.1% 9 5 14 64.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 2023 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
32 2025 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2026 6 8 14 42.9% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 186 163 349 53.3% 93 67 160 58.1% 24 19 43 55.8% — 81 107 188 43.1% 16 21 37 43.2% 41 24 65 63.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 520/552 of Sloane Stephens's and 279/290 of Coco Vandeweghe's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Sloane Stephens Coco Vandeweghe
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
14 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 1/1 2.0 2.0 40.4% 69.6% 38.2% 50.0% 100.0% 50.9% 26.1%
15 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 1/1 7.0 7.0 53.2% 75.8% 41.4% 62.5% 16.7% 59.7% 30.9%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 3/3 1.3 2.3 58.0% 53.2% 40.3% 36.1% 50.7% 47.4% 37.5%
17 2010 5/5 0.6 3.6 64.1% 58.7% 39.2% 42.2% 62.2% 52.1% 42.9% 2009 3/3 3.7 0.0 64.6% 54.3% 58.5% 52.3% 36.7% 55.8% 36.4%
18 2011 16/16 1.4 3.0 59.3% 59.3% 47.2% 41.8% 52.7% 54.1% 43.8% 2010 11/12 4.5 5.5 58.9% 63.3% 38.8% 49.9% 47.6% 53.0% 42.0%
19 2012 36/38 1.7 3.6 62.4% 61.6% 46.4% 48.6% 43.2% 55.6% 45.1% 2011 21/21 3.9 5.3 52.3% 64.7% 44.8% 49.5% 41.2% 55.2% 39.7%
20 2013 58/62 2.1 2.7 64.9% 63.2% 45.5% 49.3% 49.5% 56.8% 44.8% 2012 12/13 5.7 5.1 48.8% 74.1% 45.6% 66.1% 63.0% 59.6% 40.2%
21 2014 37/39 1.7 2.4 68.3% 62.0% 46.2% 53.8% 38.4% 57.0% 41.9% 2013 16/16 5.8 4.9 49.7% 68.0% 46.7% 50.2% 43.9% 56.9% 41.9%
22 2015 44/54 2.4 2.3 61.6% 65.6% 54.6% 58.0% 54.1% 61.5% 42.6% 2014 36/36 8.5 4.6 53.3% 76.0% 47.8% 52.7% 45.7% 62.8% 40.3%
23 2016 29/31 2.0 1.8 65.8% 64.5% 49.5% 52.7% 47.8% 59.4% 44.8% 2015 34/41 6.8 3.6 54.9% 70.6% 56.0% 60.3% 42.3% 63.9% 37.0%
24 2017 22/23 1.1 1.5 67.7% 61.0% 47.2% 59.8% 54.5% 56.6% 41.8% 2016 38/40 5.9 3.7 54.7% 72.8% 49.4% 54.0% 45.2% 62.3% 41.9%
25 2018 47/53 0.8 1.5 69.8% 62.1% 49.9% 51.8% 51.5% 58.5% 47.2% 2017 47/47 5.3 4.3 54.7% 74.4% 50.5% 61.6% 43.8% 63.6% 41.3%
26 2019 39/41 1.0 1.7 69.4% 59.9% 47.7% 47.6% 43.1% 56.2% 44.2% 2018 25/25 5.9 5.2 54.5% 69.3% 46.5% 55.0% 43.6% 59.1% 38.2%
27 2020 15/15 2.2 2.0 69.5% 61.1% 47.1% 50.2% 44.4% 56.6% 40.0% 2019 4/4 3.5 5.0 45.4% 65.4% 40.8% 48.8% 24.6% 52.3% 35.4%
28 2021 35/35 1.5 2.1 69.1% 59.7% 46.9% 57.7% 45.3% 55.7% 42.8% 2020 2/2 6.0 7.0 55.9% 70.7% 37.8% 64.6% 22.2% 56.1% 36.7%
29 2022 35/35 1.2 2.1 71.3% 60.8% 45.5% 51.6% 51.8% 56.4% 44.7% 2021 13/13 5.8 4.9 55.2% 66.9% 45.9% 39.1% 44.7% 57.6% 37.4%
30 2023 40/41 1.1 2.2 69.4% 60.6% 45.7% 51.1% 51.2% 56.1% 43.8% 2022 9/9 6.0 4.4 50.7% 69.4% 45.3% 48.0% 40.8% 57.5% 35.7%
31 2024 40/40 0.8 1.6 72.9% 58.8% 49.8% 46.9% 39.1% 55.9% 42.6% 2023 3/3 7.3 6.3 49.4% 66.2% 41.4% 41.5% 20.1% 53.6% 32.8%
32 2025 3/5 1.0 2.7 64.5% 54.1% 31.3% 50.1% 42.1% 46.2% 40.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2026 19/19 0.9 2.0 66.5% 57.5% 47.5% 54.6% 45.5% 54.2% 39.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 520/552 1.5 2.2 67.3% 61.4% 47.7% 51.6% 47.6% 56.9% 43.7% — 279/290 5.9 4.5 53.8% 70.7% 48.2% 54.6% 44.2% 60.2% 39.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Sloane Stephens Coco Vandeweghe
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1485 98.4 -1.31 -2.15 0.531 39.8% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.21
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1480 104.6 -2.63 -2.18 0.766 44.6% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.09
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1453 104.3 +0.09 -1.10 0.713 42.8% +20 — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.14
17 2010 1519 108.2 -1.34 +0.26 0.895 47.8% — +19 — 40.0% -1.10 — 2–0 — -0.36 2009 1466 104.1 +1.17 -2.23 0.824 46.3% +13 — — 33.3% -1.83 — — — -0.10
18 2011 1581 116.3 -0.64 -0.35 0.955 48.8% +19 -78 — 40.6% -0.69 1–1 2–0 — +0.03 2010 1567 119.9 -0.34 -0.02 0.895 47.8% +7 — — 45.8% -0.83 1–1 1–1 — +0.28
19 2012 1709 130.0 +0.14 +1.30 1.016 50.3% -38 -86 -53 52.7% +0.20 9–8 (53%) 5–5 (50%) 102.2 +0.59 2011 1543 108.2 -1.37 -3.03 0.887 47.8% +26 — +40 34.8% -0.78 4–0 (100%) 1–5 (17%) 102.6 +1.49
20 2013 1827 148.1 +1.68 +1.63 1.037 50.8% -16 -126 -97 58.2% +0.39 17–7 (71%) 8–6 (57%) 109.7 +0.29 2012 1605 131.1 +3.23 -0.27 0.996 49.9% +24 — — 48.3% -0.10 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — -0.31
21 2014 1733 132.5 +1.10 -0.90 0.974 49.4% +23 -27 -2 51.7% -0.02 5–6 (45%) 5–3 (63%) 100.3 +0.75 2013 1563 120.9 +0.40 -1.77 0.973 49.4% +55 — — 37.8% -0.43 1–4 (20%) 2–4 (33%) 95.2 +0.12
22 2015 1787 143.0 +3.00 +2.02 1.106 52.3% -23 -18 -9 60.9% +0.54 5–8 (38%) 10–1 (91%) 104.6 -2.66 2014 1731 138.8 +5.61 -2.20 1.082 51.2% -19 — -18 55.7% +0.23 7–4 (64%) 7–6 (54%) 106.7 -0.26
23 2016 1756 122.0 +2.14 +0.81 1.106 52.0% -20 +53 +23 60.9% +0.56 7–2 (78%) 8–2 (80%) 107.2 +0.83 2015 1726 124.1 +4.83 -2.53 1.026 50.3% -38 -235 +47 51.1% -0.08 8–6 (57%) 10–3 (77%) 107.1 -1.43
24 2017 1864 153.6 +0.98 +1.17 0.964 49.2% +11 — — 57.7% +0.35 8–0 (100%) 4–2 (67%) 111.8 -1.70 2016 1733 136.0 +5.07 -0.74 1.111 51.7% -68 -242 +155 56.2% +0.31 5–6 (45%) 5–4 (56%) 100.7 -0.72
25 2018 1921 157.9 +2.48 +3.98 1.139 52.7% +6 -17 — 61.0% +0.94 10–9 (53%) 3–7 (30%) 96.1 -0.56 2017 1859 148.2 +6.32 -0.55 1.133 51.9% -29 -280 +61 60.0% +0.45 6–6 (50%) 11–2 (85%) 108.7 -1.00
26 2019 1786 136.3 -0.49 +1.33 1.009 50.2% -24 +182 -21 52.6% -0.19 7–6 (54%) 11–2 (85%) 104.6 +1.76 2018 1691 124.0 +2.04 -2.71 0.932 48.6% -31 -30 +160 43.4% -0.55 2–5 (29%) 6–5 (55%) 95.6 -0.76
27 2020 1641 114.3 +0.15 -1.60 0.922 48.1% +16 +243 — 37.8% -0.68 1–6 (14%) 1–1 — +1.57 2019 1690 112.5 -0.39 -0.74 0.742 44.1% -7 — — 25.0% -1.63 — 0–1 — -0.01
28 2021 1760 134.1 -0.59 +0.37 0.967 49.3% -115 +157 +83 52.4% -0.19 6–8 (43%) 3–5 (38%) 97.2 -0.75 2020 1624 102.4 -0.35 -1.49 0.835 46.5% — — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 — — -0.12
29 2022 1785 140.6 -0.05 +2.25 1.024 50.4% +9 +46 — 50.6% +0.06 7–8 (47%) 2–2 (50%) 98.7 +0.24 2021 1591 99.2 -0.08 -3.74 0.881 47.2% -64 — +332 34.5% -1.10 1–2 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 96.4 +0.17
30 2023 1790 135.6 -0.42 +1.25 0.998 49.9% -56 +122 — 50.5% +0.02 6–7 (46%) 3–6 (33%) 94.4 -0.37 2022 1667 108.1 +0.32 -2.42 0.840 46.3% -63 +2 — 36.4% -0.96 4–0 (100%) 0–1 — +0.03
31 2024 1689 137.0 -0.42 -0.12 0.965 49.0% -19 +171 +35 47.3% -0.11 6–5 (55%) 1–2 (33%) — -1.59 2023 1534 102.7 -1.75 -2.65 0.707 43.4% -15 — — 28.6% -1.72 1–0 1–1 — -0.10
32 2025 1604 109.9 -1.23 +0.23 0.757 43.6% -34 — — 16.7% -2.34 0–2 — — -0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2026 1699 132.4 -1.61 -2.12 0.859 47.0% -20 +56 — 36.6% -1.20 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — -0.66 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1952 145.6 +0.68 +1.07 1.013 50.2% -17 +47 -9 53.0% +0.11 97–84 (54%) 69–45 (61%) 107.5 -0.49 — 1880 132.9 +3.27 -1.72 0.995 49.7% -17 -153 +106 47.8% -0.23 41–37 (53%) 46–37 (55%) 106.9 -0.94

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.